From 5948b700b3163fb939e50b499327018ce8ff3567 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Romain Pelisse <rpelisse@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:09:01 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Oups, last commit included test case for bug [ 1955852 ]
 false positives for UnusedPrivateMethod &amp; UnusedLocalField. Setting them
 to non regression test.

git-svn-id: https://pmd.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pmd/branches/pmd/4.2.x@6736 51baf565-9d33-0410-a72c-fc3788e3496d
---
 .../pmd/rules/unusedcode/xml/UnusedLocalVariable.xml            | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/pmd/regress/test/net/sourceforge/pmd/rules/unusedcode/xml/UnusedLocalVariable.xml b/pmd/regress/test/net/sourceforge/pmd/rules/unusedcode/xml/UnusedLocalVariable.xml
index 6b8d5d446e..1ac874fd37 100644
--- a/pmd/regress/test/net/sourceforge/pmd/rules/unusedcode/xml/UnusedLocalVariable.xml
+++ b/pmd/regress/test/net/sourceforge/pmd/rules/unusedcode/xml/UnusedLocalVariable.xml
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ public class Foo {
 }
      ]]></code>
     </test-code>
-    <test-code>
+    <test-code regressionTest="false">
 	    <description><![CDATA[
 Reproducing bug [ 1955852 ] false positives for UnusedPrivateMethod & UnusedLocalField. The following valid Java code is reported with false positives for UnusedPrivateMethod and UnusedLocalVariable. It looks like the rule does not recognise explicit type arguments to generic methods.]]></description>
 	    <expected-problems>0</expected-problems>