diff --git a/pmd/xdocs/credits.xml b/pmd/xdocs/credits.xml
index 534e7f0cc3..b967183f5b 100644
--- a/pmd/xdocs/credits.xml
+++ b/pmd/xdocs/credits.xml
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
         </subsection>
         <subsection name="Contributors">
         <ul>
+            <li>David Karr - reported stale XPath documentation</li>
             <li>Christopher Stach - several bug reports for rules that didn't handle JDK 1.5 enums</li>
             <li>Jarkko Hietaniemin - rewrote most of cpd.sh, tweaked C/CPP grammar to allow $ in identifiers, several CPD documentation suggestions, noted missing CPD scripts in binary release</li>
             <li>Dawid Weiss - Reported bug in UnusedPrivateMethod</li>
diff --git a/pmd/xdocs/xpathruletutorial.xml b/pmd/xdocs/xpathruletutorial.xml
index fe1972f482..852df06e3a 100644
--- a/pmd/xdocs/xpathruletutorial.xml
+++ b/pmd/xdocs/xpathruletutorial.xml
@@ -95,7 +95,11 @@ Writing PMD rules with XPath can be a bit easier than writing rules with Java co
 	<p>You'll quickly see that all three local variables are matched.  A possible
 	solution for this is to request that the parent of the local variable 
 	declaration is the MethodDeclaration node:</p>
-	<source><![CDATA[//LocalVariableDeclaration[name(../../..) = 'MethodDeclaration']]]></source>
+	<source>
+        <![CDATA[
+    //LocalVariableDeclaration[name(../../..) = 'MethodDeclaration']
+ ]]>
+    </source>
 	<subsection name="Matching variables by name">
 	<p>Let's consider that we are writing rules for logger. Let's assume we 
 	use the Java logging API and we want to find all classes that have more
@@ -141,7 +145,12 @@ Writing PMD rules with XPath can be a bit easier than writing rules with Java co
 }
 ]]></source>
 	<p>The following expression does the magic we need:</p>
-	<source><![CDATA[//VariableDeclarator[../Type/Name[@Image='Factory'] and ..[@Final='false'] ]]]></source>
+	<source><![CDATA[
+//VariableDeclarator
+ [../Type/ReferenceType/ClassOrInterfaceType
+  [@Image = 'Factory'] and ..[@Final='false']]
+ ]]>
+    </source>
 	<p>I must recommend at this point that you experiment with Designer putting
 	the final modifier to the Factory and verifying that the results produced
 	are those expected.</p>