# Code Style | PMD Source Code Analyzer
Keywords: Code Style, AbstractNaming, AtLeastOneConstructor, AvoidDollarSigns, AvoidFinalLocalVariable, AvoidPrefixingMethodParameters, AvoidProtectedFieldInFinalClass, AvoidProtectedMethodInFinalClassNotExtending, AvoidUsingNativeCode, BooleanGetMethodName, CallSuperInConstructor, ClassNamingConventions, CommentDefaultAccessModifier, ConfusingTernary, ControlStatementBraces, DefaultPackage, DontImportJavaLang, DuplicateImports, EmptyMethodInAbstractClassShouldBeAbstract, EmptyControlStatement, ExtendsObject, FieldDeclarationsShouldBeAtStartOfClass, FieldNamingConventions, [cut: 1664 characters, first 569 kept]

# Code Style

Rules which enforce a specific coding style.

## AbstractNaming

Deprecated

Since: PMD 1.4

Priority: Medium (3)

Abstract classes should be named ‘AbstractXXX’.

This rule is deprecated and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced by `ClassNamingConventions`.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration
     [@Abstract= true() and @Interface= false()]
     [not (starts-with(@SimpleName,'Abstract'))]
    |
    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration
     [@Abstract= false()]
     [$strict= true()]
     [starts-with(@SimpleName, 'Abstract')]

Example(s):

    public abstract class Foo { // should be AbstractFoo
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
strict | true | Also flag classes, that are named Abstract, but are not abstract. | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AbstractNaming" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AbstractNaming">
        <properties>
            <property name="strict" value="true" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## AtLeastOneConstructor

Since: PMD 1.04

Priority: Medium (3)

Each non-static class should declare at least one constructor. Classes with solely static members are ignored, refer to UseUtilityClassRule to detect those.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.AtLeastOneConstructorRule

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
       // missing constructor
      public void doSomething() { ... }
      public void doOtherThing { ... }
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
ignoredAnnotations | lombok.Data | lombok.Value | lombok.Builder | lombok.NoArgsConstructor | lombok.RequiredArgsConstructor | lombok.AllArgsConstructor | Fully qualified names of the annotation types that should be ignored by this rule | yes. Delimiter is ‘|’.

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AtLeastOneConstructor" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AtLeastOneConstructor">
        <properties>
            <property name="ignoredAnnotations" value="lombok.Data|lombok.Value|lombok.Builder|lombok.NoArgsConstructor|lombok.RequiredArgsConstructor|lombok.AllArgsConstructor" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## AvoidDollarSigns

Since: PMD 1.5

Priority: Medium (3)

Avoid using dollar signs in variable/method/class/interface names.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.AvoidDollarSignsRule

Example(s):

    public class Fo$o {  // not a recommended name
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AvoidDollarSigns" />

## AvoidFinalLocalVariable

Deprecated

Since: PMD 4.1

Priority: Medium (3)

Avoid using final local variables, turn them into fields.

Note that this is a controversial rule which is merely useful to enforce a certain code style (which is contradictory to good coding practices in most of the cases it’s applied to) and avoid local literals being declared in a scope smaller than the class.

Also note, that this rule is the opposite of `LocalVariableCouldBeFinal`. Having both rules enabled results in contradictory violations being reported.

This rule is deprecated and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. There is no replacement planned. If the goal is to avoid defining constants in a scope smaller than the class, then the rule `AvoidDuplicateLiterals` should be used instead.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //LocalVariableDeclaration[
      @Final = true()
      and not(../../ForStatement)
      and
      (
        (count(VariableDeclarator/VariableInitializer) = 0)
        or
        (VariableDeclarator/VariableInitializer/Expression/PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/Literal)
      )
    ]

Example(s):

    public class MyClass {
        public void foo() {
            final String finalLocalVariable;
        }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AvoidFinalLocalVariable" />

## AvoidPrefixingMethodParameters

Deprecated

Since: PMD 5.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

Prefixing parameters by ‘in’ or ‘out’ pollutes the name of the parameters and reduces code readability. To indicate whether or not a parameter will be modify in a method, its better to document method behavior with Javadoc.

This rule is deprecated and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced by the more general rule `FormalParameterNamingConventions`.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //MethodDeclaration/MethodDeclarator/FormalParameters/FormalParameter/VariableDeclaratorId[
            pmd:matches(@Name,'^in[A-Z].*','^out[A-Z].*','^in$','^out$')
    ]

Example(s):

    // Not really clear
    public class Foo {
      public void bar(
          int inLeftOperand,
          Result outRightOperand) {
          outRightOperand.setValue(inLeftOperand * outRightOperand.getValue());
      }
    }

    // Far more useful
    public class Foo {
      /**
       *
       * @param leftOperand, (purpose), not modified by method.
       * @param rightOperand (purpose), will be modified by the method: contains the result.
       */
      public void bar(
            int leftOperand,
            Result rightOperand) {
            rightOperand.setValue(leftOperand * rightOperand.getValue());
      }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AvoidPrefixingMethodParameters" />

## AvoidProtectedFieldInFinalClass

Since: PMD 2.1

Priority: Medium (3)

Do not use protected fields in final classes since they cannot be subclassed. Clarify your intent by using private or package access modifiers instead.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration[@Final= true()]
    /ClassOrInterfaceBody/ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration
    /FieldDeclaration[@Protected= true()]

Example(s):

    public final class Bar {
      private int x;
      protected int y;  // bar cannot be subclassed, so is y really private or package visible?
      Bar() {}
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AvoidProtectedFieldInFinalClass" />

## AvoidProtectedMethodInFinalClassNotExtending

Since: PMD 5.1

Priority: Medium (3)

Do not use protected methods in most final classes since they cannot be subclassed. This should only be allowed in final classes that extend other classes with protected methods (whose visibility cannot be reduced). Clarify your intent by using private or package access modifiers instead.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration[@Final= true() and not(ExtendsList)]
    /ClassOrInterfaceBody/ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration
    /MethodDeclaration[@Protected=true() and @Name != 'finalize']

Example(s):

    public final class Foo {
      private int bar() {}
      protected int baz() {} // Foo cannot be subclassed, and doesn't extend anything, so is baz() really private or package visible?
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AvoidProtectedMethodInFinalClassNotExtending" />

## AvoidUsingNativeCode

Since: PMD 4.1

Priority: Medium High (2)

Unnecessary reliance on Java Native Interface (JNI) calls directly reduces application portability and increases the maintenance burden.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //Name[starts-with(@Image,'System.loadLibrary')]

Example(s):

    public class SomeJNIClass {

         public SomeJNIClass() {
             System.loadLibrary("nativelib");
         }

         static {
             System.loadLibrary("nativelib");
         }

         public void invalidCallsInMethod() throws SecurityException, NoSuchMethodException {
             System.loadLibrary("nativelib");
         }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AvoidUsingNativeCode" />

## BooleanGetMethodName

Since: PMD 4.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

Methods that return boolean results should be named as predicate statements to denote this. I.e, ‘isReady()’, ‘hasValues()’, ‘canCommit()’, ‘willFail()’, etc. Avoid the use of the ‘get’ prefix for these methods.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //MethodDeclaration
        [starts-with(@Name, 'get')]
        [@Arity = 0 or $checkParameterizedMethods = true()]
        [
            ResultType/Type/PrimitiveType[@Image = 'boolean']
            and not(../Annotation//Name[@Image = 'Override'])
        ]

Example(s):

    public boolean getFoo();            // bad
    public boolean isFoo();             // ok
    public boolean getFoo(boolean bar); // ok, unless checkParameterizedMethods=true

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
checkParameterizedMethods | false | Check parameterized methods | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/BooleanGetMethodName" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/BooleanGetMethodName">
        <properties>
            <property name="checkParameterizedMethods" value="false" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## CallSuperInConstructor

Since: PMD 3.0

Priority: Medium (3)

It is a good practice to call super() in a constructor. If super() is not called but another constructor (such as an overloaded constructor) is called, this rule will not report it.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration[ExtendsList/*]
    /ClassOrInterfaceBody
     /ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration
     /ConstructorDeclaration[ not(.//ExplicitConstructorInvocation) ]

Example(s):

    public class Foo extends Bar{
      public Foo() {
       // call the constructor of Bar
       super();
      }
     public Foo(int code) {
      // do something with code
       this();
       // no problem with this
      }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/CallSuperInConstructor" />

## ClassNamingConventions

Since: PMD 1.2

Priority: High (1)

Configurable naming conventions for type declarations. This rule reports type declarations which do not match the regex that applies to their specific kind (e.g. enum or interface). Each regex can be configured through properties.

By default, this rule uses the standard Java naming convention (Pascal case).

The rule can detect utility classes and enforce a different naming convention on those. E.g. setting the property `utilityClassPattern` to `[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]+(Utils?|Helper|Constants)` reports any utility class, whose name does not end in "Util(s)", "Helper" or "Constants".

For this rule, a utility class is defined as: a concrete class that does not inherit from a super class or implement any interface and only has static fields or methods.

This rule detects test classes using the following convention: Test classes are top-level classes, that either inherit from JUnit 3 TestCase or have at least one method annotated with the Test annotations from JUnit4/5 or TestNG.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.ClassNamingConventionsRule

Example(s):

    // This is Pascal case, the recommended naming convention in Java
    // Note that the default values of this rule don't allow underscores
    // or accented characters in type names
    public class FooBar {}

    // You may want abstract classes to be named 'AbstractXXX',
    // in which case you can customize the regex for abstract
    // classes to 'Abstract[A-Z]\w+'
    public abstract class Thing {}

    // This class doesn't respect the convention, and will be flagged
    public class Éléphant {}

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
classPattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to concrete class names | no
abstractClassPattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to abstract class names | no
interfacePattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to interface names | no
enumPattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to enum names | no
annotationPattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to annotation names | no
utilityClassPattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to utility class names | no
testClassPattern | ^Test.*$|^[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*Test(s|Case)?$ | Regex which applies to test class names. Since PMD 6.52.0. | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ClassNamingConventions" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ClassNamingConventions">
        <properties>
            <property name="classPattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="abstractClassPattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="interfacePattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="enumPattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="annotationPattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="utilityClassPattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="testClassPattern" value="^Test.*$|^[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*Test(s|Case)?$" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## CommentDefaultAccessModifier

Since: PMD 5.4.0

Priority: Medium (3)

To avoid mistakes if we want that an Annotation, Class, Enum, Method, Constructor or Field have a default access modifier we must add a comment at the beginning of its declaration. By default, the comment must be `/* default */` or `/* package */`, if you want another, you have to provide a regular expression.

This rule ignores by default all cases that have a `@VisibleForTesting` annotation or any JUnit5 annotation. Use the property "ignoredAnnotations" to customize the recognized annotations.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.CommentDefaultAccessModifierRule

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
        final String stringValue = "some string";
        String getString() {
           return stringValue;
        }

        class NestedFoo {
        }
    }

    // should be
    public class Foo {
        /* default */ final String stringValue = "some string";
        /* default */ String getString() {
           return stringValue;
        }

        /* default */ class NestedFoo {
        }
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---

ignoredAnnotations

com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting | android.support.annotation.VisibleForTesting | org.junit.jupiter.api.Test | org.junit.jupiter.api.ParameterizedTest | org.junit.jupiter.api.RepeatedTest | org.junit.jupiter.api.TestFactory | org.junit.jupiter.api.TestTemplate | org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach | org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeAll | org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterEach | org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterAll | lombok.Value

Fully qualified names of the annotation types that should be ignored by this rule

yes. Delimiter is ‘|’.

regex | \/\*\s+(default|package)\s+\*\/ | Regular expression | no
checkTopLevelTypes | false | Check for default access modifier in top-level classes, annotations, and enums | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/CommentDefaultAccessModifier" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/CommentDefaultAccessModifier">
        <properties>
            <property name="ignoredAnnotations" value="com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting|android.support.annotation.VisibleForTesting|org.junit.jupiter.api.Test|org.junit.jupiter.api.ParameterizedTest|org.junit.jupiter.api.RepeatedTest|org.junit.jupiter.api.TestFactory|org.junit.jupiter.api.TestTemplate|org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach|org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeAll|org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterEach|org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterAll|lombok.Value" />
            <property name="regex" value="\/\*\s+(default|package)\s+\*\/" />
            <property name="checkTopLevelTypes" value="false" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## ConfusingTernary

Since: PMD 1.9

Priority: Medium (3)

Avoid negation within an "if" expression with an "else" clause. For example, rephrase: `if (x != y) diff(); else same();` as: `if (x == y) same(); else diff();`.

Most "if (x != y)" cases without an "else" are often return cases, so consistent use of this rule makes the code easier to read. Also, this resolves trivial ordering problems, such as "does the error case go first?" or "does the common case go first?".

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.ConfusingTernaryRule

Example(s):

    boolean bar(int x, int y) {
        return (x != y) ? diff : same;
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
ignoreElseIf | false | Ignore conditions with an else-if case | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ConfusingTernary" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ConfusingTernary">
        <properties>
            <property name="ignoreElseIf" value="false" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## ControlStatementBraces

Since: PMD 6.2.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Enforce a policy for braces on control statements. It is recommended to use braces on ‘if … else’ statements and loop statements, even if they are optional. This usually makes the code clearer, and helps prepare the future when you need to add another statement. That said, this rule lets you control which statements are required to have braces via properties.

From 6.2.0 on, this rule supersedes WhileLoopMustUseBraces, ForLoopMustUseBraces, IfStmtMustUseBraces, and IfElseStmtMustUseBraces.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //WhileStatement[$checkWhileStmt and not(Statement/Block) and not($allowEmptyLoop and Statement/EmptyStatement)]
                    |
                    //ForStatement[$checkForStmt and not(Statement/Block) and not($allowEmptyLoop and Statement/EmptyStatement)]
                    |
                    //DoStatement[$checkDoWhileStmt and not(Statement/Block) and not($allowEmptyLoop and Statement/EmptyStatement)]
                    |
                    (: The violation is reported on the sub statement -- not the if statement :)
                    //Statement[$checkIfElseStmt and parent::IfStatement and not(child::Block or child::IfStatement)
                                (: Whitelists single if statements :)
                                and ($checkSingleIfStmt
                                     (: Inside this not(...) is the definition of a "single if statement" :)
                                     or not(count(../Statement) = 1 (: No else stmt :)
                                            (: Not the last branch of an 'if ... else if' chain :)
                                            and not(parent::IfStatement[parent::Statement[parent::IfStatement]])))]
                    |
                    (: Reports case labels if one of their subordinate statements is not braced :)
                    //SwitchLabel[$checkCaseStmt]
                                 [count(following-sibling::BlockStatement except following-sibling::SwitchLabel[1]/following-sibling::BlockStatement) > 1
                                  or (some $stmt (: in only the block statements until the next label :)
                                      in following-sibling::BlockStatement except following-sibling::SwitchLabel[1]/following-sibling::BlockStatement
                                      satisfies not($stmt/Statement/Block))]

Example(s):

    while (true)    // not recommended
      x++;

    while (true) {  // preferred approach
      x++;
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
checkIfElseStmt | true | Require that ‘if … else’ statements use braces | no
checkSingleIfStmt | true | Require that ‘if’ statements with a single branch use braces | no
checkWhileStmt | true | Require that ‘while’ loops use braces | no
checkForStmt | true | Require that ‘for’ loops should use braces | no
checkDoWhileStmt | true | Require that ‘do … while’ loops use braces | no
checkCaseStmt | false | Require that cases of a switch have braces | no
allowEmptyLoop | false | Allow loops with an empty statement, e.g. ‘while(true);’ | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ControlStatementBraces" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ControlStatementBraces">
        <properties>
            <property name="checkIfElseStmt" value="true" />
            <property name="checkSingleIfStmt" value="true" />
            <property name="checkWhileStmt" value="true" />
            <property name="checkForStmt" value="true" />
            <property name="checkDoWhileStmt" value="true" />
            <property name="checkCaseStmt" value="false" />
            <property name="allowEmptyLoop" value="false" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## DefaultPackage

Deprecated

Since: PMD 3.4

Priority: Medium (3)

Use explicit scoping instead of accidental usage of default package private level. The rule allows methods and fields annotated with Guava’s @VisibleForTesting and JUnit 5’s annotations.

This rule is deprecated since PMD 6.35.0. It assumes that any usage of package-access is accidental, and by doing so, prohibits using a really fundamental and useful feature of the language.

To satisfy the rule, you have to make the member public even if it doesn’t need to, or make it protected, which muddies your intent even more if you don’t intend the class to be extended, and may be at odds with other rules like `AvoidProtectedFieldInFinalClass`.

The rule `CommentDefaultAccessModifier` should be used instead. This rule flags the same thing, but has an escape hatch.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration[@Interface= false()]
    /ClassOrInterfaceBody
    /ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration
    [not(Annotation//Name[
        pmd-java:typeIs('org.junit.jupiter.api.Test')
        or pmd-java:typeIs('org.junit.jupiter.api.RepeatedTest')
        or pmd-java:typeIs('org.junit.jupiter.api.ParameterizedTest')
        or pmd-java:typeIs('org.junit.jupiter.api.TestFactory')
        or pmd-java:typeIs('org.junit.jupiter.api.TestTemplate')
        or pmd-java:typeIs('org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeAll')
        or pmd-java:typeIs('org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterAll')
        or pmd-java:typeIs('org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach')
        or pmd-java:typeIs('org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterEach')
        or ends-with(@Image, 'VisibleForTesting')])]
    [
    FieldDeclaration[@PackagePrivate= true()]
    or MethodDeclaration[@PackagePrivate= true()]
    ]

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/DefaultPackage" />

## DontImportJavaLang

Deprecated

Since: PMD 0.5

Priority: Medium Low (4)

Avoid importing anything from the package ‘java.lang’. These classes are automatically imported (JLS 7.5.3).

This rule is deprecated since PMD 6.34.0. Use the rule `UnnecessaryImport` from category codestyle instead.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.DontImportJavaLangRule

Example(s):

    import java.lang.String;    // this is unnecessary

    public class Foo {}

    // --- in another source code file...

    import java.lang.*;         // this is bad

    public class Foo {}

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/DontImportJavaLang" />

## DuplicateImports

Deprecated

Since: PMD 0.5

Priority: Medium Low (4)

Duplicate or overlapping import statements should be avoided.

This rule is deprecated since PMD 6.34.0. Use the rule `UnnecessaryImport` from category codestyle instead.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.DuplicateImportsRule

Example(s):

    import java.lang.String;
    import java.lang.*;
    public class Foo {}

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/DuplicateImports" />

## EmptyControlStatement

Since: PMD 6.46.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Reports control statements whose body is empty, as well as empty initializers.

The checked code constructs are the following:

- bodies of `try` statements
- `finally` clauses of `try` statements
- `switch` statements
- `synchronized` statements
- `if` statements
- loop statements: `while`, `for`, `do .. while`
- initializers
- blocks used as statements (for scoping)

This rule replaces the rules EmptyFinallyBlock, EmptyIfStmt, EmptyInitializer, EmptyStatementBlock, EmptySwitchStatements, EmptySynchronizedBlock, EmptyTryBlock, and EmptyWhileStmt.

Notice that `EmptyCatchBlock` is still an independent rule.

EmptyStatementNotInLoop is replaced by `UnnecessarySemicolon`.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.EmptyControlStatementRule

Example(s):

    class Foo {
        {
            if (true); // empty if statement
            if (true) { // empty as well
            }
        }

        {} // empty initializer
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/EmptyControlStatement" />

## EmptyMethodInAbstractClassShouldBeAbstract

Since: PMD 4.1

Priority: High (1)

Empty or auto-generated methods in an abstract class should be tagged as abstract. This helps to remove their inapproprate usage by developers who should be implementing their own versions in the concrete subclasses.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration[@Abstract = true()]
        /ClassOrInterfaceBody
        /ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration
        /MethodDeclaration[@Abstract = false() and @Native = false()]
        [
            ( boolean(./Block[count(./BlockStatement) =  1]/BlockStatement/Statement/ReturnStatement/Expression/PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/Literal/NullLiteral) = true() )
            or
            ( boolean(./Block[count(./BlockStatement) =  1]/BlockStatement/Statement/ReturnStatement/Expression/PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/Literal[@Image = '0']) = true() )
            or
            ( boolean(./Block[count(./BlockStatement) =  1]/BlockStatement/Statement/ReturnStatement/Expression/PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/Literal[string-length(@Image) = 2]) = true() )
            or
            (./Block[count(./BlockStatement) =  1]/BlockStatement/Statement/EmptyStatement)
            or
            ( not (./Block/*) )
        ]

Example(s):

    public abstract class ShouldBeAbstract {
        public Object couldBeAbstract() {
            // Should be abstract method ?
            return null;
        }

        public void couldBeAbstract() {
        }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/EmptyMethodInAbstractClassShouldBeAbstract" />

## ExtendsObject

Since: PMD 5.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

No need to explicitly extend Object.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ExtendsList/ClassOrInterfaceType[@Image='Object' or @Image='java.lang.Object']

Example(s):

    public class Foo extends Object {     // not required
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ExtendsObject" />

## FieldDeclarationsShouldBeAtStartOfClass

Since: PMD 5.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Fields should be declared at the top of the class, before any method declarations, constructors, initializers or inner classes.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.FieldDeclarationsShouldBeAtStartOfClassRule

Example(s):

    public class HelloWorldBean {

      // Field declared before methods / inner classes - OK
      private String _thing;

      public String getMessage() {
        return "Hello World!";
      }

      // Field declared after methods / inner classes - avoid this
      private String _fieldInWrongLocation;
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
ignoreEnumDeclarations | true | Ignore Enum Declarations that precede fields. | no
ignoreAnonymousClassDeclarations | true | Ignore Field Declarations, that are initialized with anonymous class declarations | no
ignoreInterfaceDeclarations | false | Ignore Interface Declarations that precede fields. | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FieldDeclarationsShouldBeAtStartOfClass" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FieldDeclarationsShouldBeAtStartOfClass">
        <properties>
            <property name="ignoreEnumDeclarations" value="true" />
            <property name="ignoreAnonymousClassDeclarations" value="true" />
            <property name="ignoreInterfaceDeclarations" value="false" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## FieldNamingConventions

Since: PMD 6.7.0

Priority: High (1)

Configurable naming conventions for field declarations. This rule reports variable declarations which do not match the regex that applies to their specific kind —e.g. constants (static final), enum constant, final field. Each regex can be configured through properties.

By default this rule uses the standard Java naming convention (Camel case), and uses the ALL_UPPER convention for constants and enum constants.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.FieldNamingConventionsRule

Example(s):

    class Foo {
                    int myField = 1; // This is in camel case, so it's ok
                    int my_Field = 1; // This contains an underscore, it's not ok by default
                                      // but you may allow it, or even require the "my_" prefix

                    final int FinalField = 1; // you may configure a different convention for final fields,
                                              // e.g. here PascalCase: [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*

                    interface Interface {
                        double PI = 3.14; // interface "fields" use the constantPattern property
                    }

                    enum AnEnum {
                        ORG, NET, COM; // These use a separate property but are set to ALL_UPPER by default
                    }
                }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
publicConstantPattern | [A-Z][A-Z_0-9]* | Regex which applies to public constant names | no
constantPattern | [A-Z][A-Z_0-9]* | Regex which applies to non-public static final field names | no
enumConstantPattern | [A-Z][A-Z_0-9]* | Regex which applies to enum constant names | no
finalFieldPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to final field names | no
staticFieldPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to static field names | no
defaultFieldPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to field names | no
exclusions | serialVersionUID | serialPersistentFields | Names of fields to whitelist. | yes. Delimiter is ‘|’.

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FieldNamingConventions" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FieldNamingConventions">
        <properties>
            <property name="publicConstantPattern" value="[A-Z][A-Z_0-9]*" />
            <property name="constantPattern" value="[A-Z][A-Z_0-9]*" />
            <property name="enumConstantPattern" value="[A-Z][A-Z_0-9]*" />
            <property name="finalFieldPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="staticFieldPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="defaultFieldPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="exclusions" value="serialVersionUID|serialPersistentFields" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## FinalParameterInAbstractMethod

Since: PMD 6.42.0

Priority: High (1)

Declaring a method parameter as final for an interface method is useless because the implementation may choose to not respect it.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //MethodDeclaration[
        MethodDeclarator/FormalParameters/FormalParameter[@Final = true()] and
        not(Block)
    ]

Example(s):

    public interface MyInterface {
      void process(final Object arg); // Avoid using final here
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FinalParameterInAbstractMethod" />

## ForLoopShouldBeWhileLoop

Since: PMD 1.02

Priority: Medium (3)

Some for loops can be simplified to while loops, this makes them more concise.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ForStatement
      [not(LocalVariableDeclaration)]
      [not(ForInit)]
      [not(ForUpdate)]
      [Expression]

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
        void bar() {
            for (;true;) true; // No Init or Update part, may as well be: while (true)
        }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ForLoopShouldBeWhileLoop" />

## ForLoopsMustUseBraces

Deprecated

Since: PMD 0.7

Priority: Medium (3)

Avoid using ‘for’ statements without using curly braces. If the code formatting or indentation is lost then it becomes difficult to separate the code being controlled from the rest.

This rule is deprecated and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced by the rule `ControlStatementBraces`.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ForStatement[not(Statement/Block)]

Example(s):

    for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++)
       foo();

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ForLoopsMustUseBraces" />

## FormalParameterNamingConventions

Since: PMD 6.6.0

Priority: High (1)

Configurable naming conventions for formal parameters of methods and lambdas. This rule reports formal parameters which do not match the regex that applies to their specific kind (e.g. lambda parameter, or final formal parameter). Each regex can be configured through properties.

By default this rule uses the standard Java naming convention (Camel case).

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.FormalParameterNamingConventionsRule

Example(s):

    class Foo {

                    abstract void bar(int myInt); // This is Camel case, so it's ok

                    void bar(int my_i) { // this will be reported

                    }

                    void lambdas() {

                        // lambdas parameters can be configured separately
                        Consumer<String> lambda1 = s_str -> { };

                        // lambda parameters with an explicit type can be configured separately
                        Consumer<String> lambda1 = (String str) -> { };

                    }

                }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
methodParameterPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to formal parameter names | no
finalMethodParameterPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to final formal parameter names | no
lambdaParameterPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to inferred-type lambda parameter names | no
explicitLambdaParameterPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to explicitly-typed lambda parameter names | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FormalParameterNamingConventions" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FormalParameterNamingConventions">
        <properties>
            <property name="methodParameterPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="finalMethodParameterPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="lambdaParameterPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="explicitLambdaParameterPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## GenericsNaming

Since: PMD 4.2.6

Priority: Medium Low (4)

Names for references to generic values should be limited to a single uppercase letter.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //TypeDeclaration/ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration/TypeParameters/TypeParameter[
      string-length(@Image) > 1
      or
      upper-case(@Image) != @Image
    ]

Example(s):

    public interface GenericDao<E extends BaseModel, K extends Serializable> extends BaseDao {
        // This is ok...
    }

    public interface GenericDao<E extends BaseModel, K extends Serializable> {
        // Also this
    }

    public interface GenericDao<e extends BaseModel, K extends Serializable> {
        // 'e' should be an 'E'
    }

    public interface GenericDao<EF extends BaseModel, K extends Serializable> {
       // 'EF' is not ok.
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/GenericsNaming" />

## IdenticalCatchBranches

Since: PMD 6.4.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Minimum Language Version: Java 1.7

Identical `catch` branches use up vertical space and increase the complexity of code without adding functionality. It’s better style to collapse identical branches into a single multi-catch branch.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.IdenticalCatchBranchesRule

Example(s):

    try {
        // do something
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
        throw e;
    } catch (IllegalStateException e) { // Can be collapsed into the previous block
        throw e;
    }

    try {
        // do something
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException | IllegalStateException e) { // This is better
        throw e;
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/IdenticalCatchBranches" />

## IfElseStmtsMustUseBraces

Deprecated

Since: PMD 0.2

Priority: Medium (3)

Avoid using if..else statements without using surrounding braces. If the code formatting or indentation is lost then it becomes difficult to separate the code being controlled from the rest.

This rule is deprecated and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced by the rule `ControlStatementBraces`.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //Statement
     [parent::IfStatement[@Else= true()]]
     [not(child::Block)]
     [not(child::IfStatement)]

Example(s):

    // this is OK
    if (foo) x++;

       // but this is not
    if (foo)
           x = x+1;
       else
           x = x-1;

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/IfElseStmtsMustUseBraces" />

## IfStmtsMustUseBraces

Deprecated

Since: PMD 1.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Avoid using if statements without using braces to surround the code block. If the code formatting or indentation is lost then it becomes difficult to separate the code being controlled from the rest.

This rule is deprecated and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced by the rule `ControlStatementBraces`.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //IfStatement[count(*) < 3][not(Statement/Block)]

Example(s):

    if (foo)    // not recommended
        x++;

    if (foo) {  // preferred approach
        x++;
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/IfStmtsMustUseBraces" />

## LinguisticNaming

Since: PMD 6.7.0

Priority: Medium (3)

This rule finds Linguistic Naming Antipatterns. It checks for fields, that are named, as if they should be boolean but have a different type. It also checks for methods, that according to their name, should return a boolean, but don’t. Further, it checks, that getters return something and setters won’t. Finally, it checks that methods, that start with "to" - so called transform methods - actually return something, since according to their name, they should convert or transform one object into another. There is additionally an option, to check for methods that contain "To" in their name - which are also transform methods. However, this is disabled by default, since this detection is prone to false positives.

For more information, see Linguistic Antipatterns - What They Are and How Developers Perceive Them.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.LinguisticNamingRule

Example(s):

    public class LinguisticNaming {
        int isValid;    // the field name indicates a boolean, but it is an int.
        boolean isTrue; // correct type of the field

        void myMethod() {
            int hasMoneyLocal;      // the local variable name indicates a boolean, but it is an int.
            boolean hasSalaryLocal; // correct naming and type
        }

        // the name of the method indicates, it is a boolean, but the method returns an int.
        int isValid() {
            return 1;
        }
        // correct naming and return type
        boolean isSmall() {
            return true;
        }

        // the name indicates, this is a setter, but it returns something
        int setName() {
            return 1;
        }

        // the name indicates, this is a getter, but it doesn't return anything
        void getName() {
            // nothing to return?
        }

        // the name indicates, it transforms an object and should return the result
        void toDataType() {
            // nothing to return?
        }
        // the name indicates, it transforms an object and should return the result
        void grapeToWine() {
            // nothing to return?
        }
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
ignoredAnnotations | java.lang.Override | Fully qualified names of the annotation types that should be ignored by this rule | yes. Delimiter is ‘|’.
checkBooleanMethod | true | Check method names and types for inconsistent naming. | no
checkGetters | true | Check return type of getters. | no
checkSetters | true | Check return type of setters. | no
checkPrefixedTransformMethods | true | Check return type of methods whose names start with the configured prefix (see transformMethodNames property). | no
checkTransformMethods | false | Check return type of methods which contain the configured infix in their name (see transformMethodNames property). | no
booleanMethodPrefixes | is | has | can | have | will | should | The prefixes of methods that return boolean. | yes. Delimiter is ‘|’.
transformMethodNames | to | as | The prefixes and infixes that indicate a transform method. | yes. Delimiter is ‘|’.
checkFields | true | Check field names and types for inconsistent naming. | no
checkVariables | true | Check local variable names and types for inconsistent naming. | no
booleanFieldPrefixes | is | has | can | have | will | should | The prefixes of fields and variables that indicate boolean. | yes. Delimiter is ‘|’.

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LinguisticNaming" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LinguisticNaming">
        <properties>
            <property name="ignoredAnnotations" value="java.lang.Override" />
            <property name="checkBooleanMethod" value="true" />
            <property name="checkGetters" value="true" />
            <property name="checkSetters" value="true" />
            <property name="checkPrefixedTransformMethods" value="true" />
            <property name="checkTransformMethods" value="false" />
            <property name="booleanMethodPrefixes" value="is|has|can|have|will|should" />
            <property name="transformMethodNames" value="to|as" />
            <property name="checkFields" value="true" />
            <property name="checkVariables" value="true" />
            <property name="booleanFieldPrefixes" value="is|has|can|have|will|should" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## LocalHomeNamingConvention

Since: PMD 4.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

The Local Home interface of a Session EJB should be suffixed by ‘LocalHome’.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration
    [
        (
            (./ExtendsList/ClassOrInterfaceType[ends-with(@Image,'EJBLocalHome')])
        )
        and
        not
        (
            ends-with(@SimpleName,'LocalHome')
        )
    ]

Example(s):

    public interface MyBeautifulLocalHome extends javax.ejb.EJBLocalHome {} // proper name

    public interface MissingProperSuffix extends javax.ejb.EJBLocalHome {}  // non-standard name

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalHomeNamingConvention" />

## LocalInterfaceSessionNamingConvention

Since: PMD 4.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

The Local Interface of a Session EJB should be suffixed by ‘Local’.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration
    [
        (
            (./ExtendsList/ClassOrInterfaceType[ends-with(@Image,'EJBLocalObject')])
        )
        and
        not
        (
            ends-with(@SimpleName,'Local')
        )
    ]

Example(s):

    public interface MyLocal extends javax.ejb.EJBLocalObject {}                // proper name

    public interface MissingProperSuffix extends javax.ejb.EJBLocalObject {}    // non-standard name

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalInterfaceSessionNamingConvention" />

## LocalVariableCouldBeFinal

Since: PMD 2.2

Priority: Medium (3)

A local variable assigned only once can be declared final.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.LocalVariableCouldBeFinalRule

Example(s):

    public class Bar {
        public void foo () {
        String txtA = "a";          // if txtA will not be assigned again it is better to do this:
        final String txtB = "b";
        }
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
ignoreForEachDecl | false | Ignore non-final loop variables in a for-each statement. | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalVariableCouldBeFinal" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalVariableCouldBeFinal">
        <properties>
            <property name="ignoreForEachDecl" value="false" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## LocalVariableNamingConventions

Since: PMD 6.6.0

Priority: High (1)

Configurable naming conventions for local variable declarations and other locally-scoped variables. This rule reports variable declarations which do not match the regex that applies to their specific kind (e.g. final variable, or catch-clause parameter). Each regex can be configured through properties.

By default this rule uses the standard Java naming convention (Camel case).

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.LocalVariableNamingConventionsRule

Example(s):

    class Foo {
                    void bar() {
                        int localVariable = 1; // This is in camel case, so it's ok
                        int local_variable = 1; // This will be reported unless you change the regex

                        final int i_var = 1; // final local variables can be configured separately

                        try {
                            foo();
                        } catch (IllegalArgumentException e_illegal) {
                            // exception block parameters can be configured separately
                        }

                    }
                }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
localVarPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to non-final local variable names | no
finalVarPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to final local variable names | no
catchParameterPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to exception block parameter names | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalVariableNamingConventions" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalVariableNamingConventions">
        <properties>
            <property name="localVarPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="finalVarPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="catchParameterPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## LongVariable

Since: PMD 0.3

Priority: Medium (3)

Fields, formal arguments, or local variable names that are too long can make the code difficult to follow.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //VariableDeclaratorId[string-length(@Name) > $minimum]

Example(s):

    public class Something {
        int reallyLongIntName = -3;             // VIOLATION - Field
        public static void main( String argumentsList[] ) { // VIOLATION - Formal
            int otherReallyLongName = -5;       // VIOLATION - Local
            for (int interestingIntIndex = 0;   // VIOLATION - For
                 interestingIntIndex < 10;
                 interestingIntIndex ++ ) {
        }
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
minimum | 17 | The variable length reporting threshold | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LongVariable" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LongVariable">
        <properties>
            <property name="minimum" value="17" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## MDBAndSessionBeanNamingConvention

Since: PMD 4.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

The EJB Specification states that any MessageDrivenBean or SessionBean should be suffixed by ‘Bean’.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //TypeDeclaration/ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration
    [
        (
            (./ImplementsList/ClassOrInterfaceType[ends-with(@Image,'SessionBean')])
            or
            (./ImplementsList/ClassOrInterfaceType[ends-with(@Image,'MessageDrivenBean')])
        )
        and
        not
        (
            ends-with(@SimpleName,'Bean')
        )
    ]

Example(s):

    public class SomeBean implements SessionBean{}                  // proper name

    public class MissingTheProperSuffix implements SessionBean {}   // non-standard name

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/MDBAndSessionBeanNamingConvention" />

## MethodArgumentCouldBeFinal

Since: PMD 2.2

Priority: Medium (3)

A method argument that is never re-assigned within the method can be declared final.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.MethodArgumentCouldBeFinalRule

Example(s):

    public void foo1 (String param) {       // do stuff with param never assigning it

    }

    public void foo2 (final String param) { // better, do stuff with param never assigning it

    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/MethodArgumentCouldBeFinal" />

## MethodNamingConventions

Since: PMD 1.2

Priority: High (1)

Configurable naming conventions for method declarations. This rule reports method declarations which do not match the regex that applies to their specific kind (e.g. JUnit test or native method). Each regex can be configured through properties.

By default this rule uses the standard Java naming convention (Camel case).

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.MethodNamingConventionsRule

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
        public void fooStuff() {
        }
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
checkNativeMethods | true | Deprecated Check native methods | no
methodPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to instance method names | no
staticPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to static method names | no
nativePattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to native method names | no
junit3TestPattern | test[A-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to JUnit 3 test method names | no
junit4TestPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to JUnit 4 test method names | no
junit5TestPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to JUnit 5 test method names | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/MethodNamingConventions" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/MethodNamingConventions">
        <properties>
            <property name="methodPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="staticPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="nativePattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="junit3TestPattern" value="test[A-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="junit4TestPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
            <property name="junit5TestPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## MIsLeadingVariableName

Deprecated

Since: PMD 3.4

Priority: Medium (3)

Detects when a non-field has a name starting with ‘m_’. This usually denotes a field and could be confusing.

This rule is deprecated and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced by the more general rule `LocalVariableNamingConventions`.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //VariableDeclaratorId
    [starts-with(@Name, 'm_')]
    [not (../../../FieldDeclaration)]

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
        private int m_foo; // OK
        public void bar(String m_baz) { // Bad
          int m_boz = 42; // Bad
        }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/MIsLeadingVariableName" />

## NoPackage

Since: PMD 3.3

Priority: Medium (3)

Detects when a class, interface, enum or annotation does not have a package definition.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    /CompilationUnit[not(./PackageDeclaration)]/TypeDeclaration[1]

Example(s):

    // no package declaration
    public class ClassInDefaultPackage {
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/NoPackage" />

## OnlyOneReturn

Since: PMD 1.0

Priority: Medium (3)

A method should have only one exit point, and that should be the last statement in the method.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.OnlyOneReturnRule

Example(s):

    public class OneReturnOnly1 {
      public String foo(int x) {
        if (x > 0) {
          return "hey";   // first exit
        }
        return "hi";    // second exit
      }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/OnlyOneReturn" />

## PackageCase

Since: PMD 3.3

Priority: Medium (3)

Detects when a package definition contains uppercase characters.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //PackageDeclaration/Name[lower-case(@Image)!=@Image]

Example(s):

    package com.MyCompany;  // should be lowercase name

    public class SomeClass {
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/PackageCase" />

## PrematureDeclaration

Since: PMD 5.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Checks for variables that are defined before they might be used. A reference is deemed to be premature if it is created right before a block of code that doesn’t use it that also has the ability to return or throw an exception.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.PrematureDeclarationRule

Example(s):

    public int getLength(String[] strings) {

        int length = 0; // declared prematurely

        if (strings == null || strings.length == 0) return 0;

        for (String str : strings) {
            length += str.length();
        }

        return length;
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/PrematureDeclaration" />

## RemoteInterfaceNamingConvention

Since: PMD 4.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

Remote Interface of a Session EJB should not have a suffix.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration
    [
        (
            (./ExtendsList/ClassOrInterfaceType[ends-with(@Image,'EJBObject')])
        )
        and
        (
            ends-with(@SimpleName,'Session')
            or
            ends-with(@SimpleName,'EJB')
            or
            ends-with(@SimpleName,'Bean')
        )
    ]

Example(s):

    /* Poor Session suffix */
    public interface BadSuffixSession extends javax.ejb.EJBObject {}

    /* Poor EJB suffix */
    public interface BadSuffixEJB extends javax.ejb.EJBObject {}

    /* Poor Bean suffix */
    public interface BadSuffixBean extends javax.ejb.EJBObject {}

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/RemoteInterfaceNamingConvention" />

## RemoteSessionInterfaceNamingConvention

Since: PMD 4.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

A Remote Home interface type of a Session EJB should be suffixed by ‘Home’.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration
    [
        (
            (./ExtendsList/ClassOrInterfaceType[ends-with(@Image,'EJBHome')])
        )
        and
        not
        (
            ends-with(@SimpleName,'Home')
        )
    ]

Example(s):

    public interface MyBeautifulHome extends javax.ejb.EJBHome {}       // proper name

    public interface MissingProperSuffix extends javax.ejb.EJBHome {}   // non-standard name

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/RemoteSessionInterfaceNamingConvention" />

## ShortClassName

Since: PMD 5.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

Short Classnames with fewer than e.g. five characters are not recommended.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration[string-length(@SimpleName) < $minimum]

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
minimum | 5 | Number of characters that are required as a minimum for a class name. | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortClassName" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortClassName">
        <properties>
            <property name="minimum" value="5" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## ShortMethodName

Since: PMD 0.3

Priority: Medium (3)

Method names that are very short are not helpful to the reader.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //MethodDeclaration[string-length(@Name) < $minimum]

Example(s):

    public class ShortMethod {
        public void a( int i ) { // Violation
        }
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
minimum | 3 | Number of characters that are required as a minimum for a method name. | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortMethodName" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortMethodName">
        <properties>
            <property name="minimum" value="3" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## ShortVariable

Since: PMD 0.3

Priority: Medium (3)

Fields, local variables, or parameter names that are very short are not helpful to the reader.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //VariableDeclaratorId[string-length(@Name) < $minimum]
     (: ForStatement :)
     [not(../../..[self::ForInit])]
     (: Foreach statement :)
     [not(../../..[self::ForStatement])]
     (: Catch statement parameter :)
     [not(../..[self::CatchStatement])]
     (: Lambda expression parameter :)
     [not(parent::LambdaExpression or ../../..[self::LambdaExpression])]

Example(s):

    public class Something {
        private int q = 15;                         // field - too short
        public static void main( String as[] ) {    // formal arg - too short
            int r = 20 + q;                         // local var - too short
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {          // not a violation (inside 'for' loop)
                r += q;
            }
            for (Integer i : numbers) {             // not a violation (inside 'for-each' loop)
                r += q;
            }
        }
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
minimum | 3 | Number of characters that are required as a minimum for a variable name. | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortVariable" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortVariable">
        <properties>
            <property name="minimum" value="3" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## SuspiciousConstantFieldName

Deprecated

Since: PMD 2.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Field names using all uppercase characters - Sun’s Java naming conventions indicating constants - should be declared as final.

This rule is deprecated and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced by the more general rule `FieldNamingConventions`.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration[@Interface= false()]
     /ClassOrInterfaceBody/ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration/FieldDeclaration
      [@Final= false()]
      [VariableDeclarator/VariableDeclaratorId[upper-case(@Name)=@Name]]

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
     // this is bad, since someone could accidentally
     // do PI = 2.71828; which is actually e
     // final double PI = 3.16; is ok
      double PI = 3.16;
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/SuspiciousConstantFieldName" />

## TooManyStaticImports

Since: PMD 4.1

Priority: Medium (3)

If you overuse the static import feature, it can make your program unreadable and unmaintainable, polluting its namespace with all the static members you import. Readers of your code (including you, a few months after you wrote it) will not know which class a static member comes from (Sun 1.5 Language Guide).

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    .[count(ImportDeclaration[@Static = true()]) > $maximumStaticImports]

Example(s):

    import static Lennon;
    import static Ringo;
    import static George;
    import static Paul;
    import static Yoko; // Too much !

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
maximumStaticImports | 4 | All static imports can be disallowed by setting this to 0 | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/TooManyStaticImports" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/TooManyStaticImports">
        <properties>
            <property name="maximumStaticImports" value="4" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## UnnecessaryAnnotationValueElement

Since: PMD 6.2.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Avoid the use of value in annotations when it’s the only element.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryAnnotationValueElementRule

Example(s):

    @TestClassAnnotation(value = "TEST")
    public class Foo {

        @TestMemberAnnotation(value = "TEST")
        private String y;

        @TestMethodAnnotation(value = "TEST")
        public void bar() {
            int x = 42;
            return;
        }
    }

    // should be

    @TestClassAnnotation("TEST")
    public class Foo {

        @TestMemberAnnotation("TEST")
        private String y;

        @TestMethodAnnotation("TEST")
        public void bar() {
            int x = 42;
            return;
        }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryAnnotationValueElement" />

## UnnecessaryCast

Since: PMD 6.24.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Minimum Language Version: Java 1.5

This rule detects when a cast is unnecessary while accessing collection elements. This rule is mostly useful for old java code before generics where introduced with java 1.5.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryCastRule

Example(s):

    public class UnnecessaryCastSample {
        public void method() {
            List<String> stringList = Arrays.asList("a", "b");
            String element = (String) stringList.get(0); // this cast is unnecessary
            String element2 = stringList.get(0);
        }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryCast" />

## UnnecessaryConstructor

Since: PMD 1.0

Priority: Medium (3)

This rule detects when a constructor is not necessary; i.e., when there is only one constructor and the constructor is identical to the default constructor. The default constructor should has same access modifier as the declaring class. In an enum type, the default constructor is implicitly private.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryConstructorRule

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
      public Foo() {}
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
ignoredAnnotations | javax.inject.Inject | Fully qualified names of the annotation types that should be ignored by this rule | yes. Delimiter is ‘|’.

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryConstructor" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryConstructor">
        <properties>
            <property name="ignoredAnnotations" value="javax.inject.Inject" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## UnnecessaryFullyQualifiedName

Since: PMD 5.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

Import statements allow the use of non-fully qualified names. The use of a fully qualified name which is covered by an import statement is redundant. Consider using the non-fully qualified name.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryFullyQualifiedNameRule

Example(s):

    import java.util.List;

    public class Foo {
        private java.util.List list1;   // Unnecessary FQN
        private List list2;             // More appropriate given import of 'java.util.List'
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryFullyQualifiedName" />

## UnnecessaryImport

Since: PMD 6.34.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

Reports import statements that can be removed. They are either unused, duplicated, or the members they import are already implicitly in scope, because they’re in java.lang, or the current package.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryImportRule

Example(s):

    import java.io.File;            // not used, can be removed
                import java.util.Collections;   // used below
                import java.util.*;             // so this one is not used

                import java.lang.Object;        // imports from java.lang, unnecessary
                import java.lang.Object;        // duplicate, unnecessary

                public class Foo {
                    static Object emptyList() {
                        return Collections.emptyList();
                    }
                }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryImport" />

## UnnecessaryLocalBeforeReturn

Since: PMD 3.3

Priority: Medium (3)

Avoid the creation of unnecessary local variables

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryLocalBeforeReturnRule

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
       public int foo() {
         int x = doSomething();
         return x;  // instead, just 'return doSomething();'
       }
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
statementOrderMatters | true | If set to false this rule no longer requires the variable declaration and return statement to be on consecutive lines. Any variable that is used solely in a return statement will be reported. | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryLocalBeforeReturn" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryLocalBeforeReturn">
        <properties>
            <property name="statementOrderMatters" value="true" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## UnnecessaryModifier

Since: PMD 1.02

Priority: Medium (3)

Fields in interfaces and annotations are automatically `public static final`, and methods are `public abstract`. Classes, interfaces or annotations nested in an interface or annotation are automatically `public static` (all nested interfaces and annotations are automatically static). Nested enums are automatically `static`. For historical reasons, modifiers which are implied by the context are accepted by the compiler, but are superfluous.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryModifierRule

Example(s):

    public @interface Annotation {
        public abstract void bar();     // both abstract and public are ignored by the compiler
        public static final int X = 0;  // public, static, and final all ignored
        public static class Bar {}      // public, static ignored
        public static interface Baz {}  // ditto
    }
    public interface Foo {
        public abstract void bar();     // both abstract and public are ignored by the compiler
        public static final int X = 0;  // public, static, and final all ignored
        public static class Bar {}      // public, static ignored
        public static interface Baz {}  // ditto
    }
    public class Bar {
        public static interface Baz {}  // static ignored
        public static enum FoorBar {    // static ignored
            FOO;
        }
    }
    public class FooClass {
        static record BarRecord() {}     // static ignored
    }
    public interface FooInterface {
        static record BarRecord() {}     // static ignored
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryModifier" />

## UnnecessaryReturn

Since: PMD 1.3

Priority: Medium (3)

Avoid the use of unnecessary return statements.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryReturnRule

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
        public void bar() {
            int x = 42;
            return;
        }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryReturn" />

## UnnecessarySemicolon

Since: PMD 6.46.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Reports unnecessary semicolons (so called "empty statements" and "empty declarations"). These can be removed without changing the program. The Java grammar allows them for historical reasons, but they should be avoided.

This rule will not report empty statements that are syntactically required, for instance, because they are the body of a control statement.

This rule replaces EmptyStatementNotInLoop.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    (: empty top-level declarations :)
          //EmptyStatement[parent::CompilationUnit]
          (: empty body declarations :)
        | //ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration[count(*)=0]
          (: empty statements :)
        | //Block/BlockStatement/Statement/EmptyStatement
          (: grammar is irregular in pmd 6 :)
        | //ConstructorDeclaration/BlockStatement/Statement/EmptyStatement

Example(s):

    class Foo {
        {
            toString();; // one of these semicolons is unnecessary
            if (true); // this semicolon is not unnecessary, but it could be an empty block instead (not reported)
        }
    }; // this semicolon is unnecessary

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessarySemicolon" />

## UseDiamondOperator

Since: PMD 6.11.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Minimum Language Version: Java 1.7

Use the diamond operator to let the type be inferred automatically. With the Diamond operator it is possible to avoid duplication of the type parameters. Instead, the compiler is now able to infer the parameter types for constructor calls, which makes the code also more readable.

The diamond operator has been introduced with java 7. However, type inference has been improved further with java8, rendering more type parameters unnecessary. This is only possible with java8 and the resulting code won’t compile with java7. If you use java7, make sure to enable `java7Compatibility` for this rule to avoid false positives.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    (
    //VariableInitializer[preceding-sibling::VariableDeclaratorId[1]/@TypeInferred=false()]
    |
    //StatementExpression[AssignmentOperator and PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix[not(Expression)]]
    )
    /(Expression | Expression[$java7Compatibility = false()]/ConditionalExpression | Expression[$java7Compatibility = false()]/ConditionalExpression/Expression)
    /PrimaryExpression[not(PrimarySuffix) and not(ancestor::ArgumentList)]
    /PrimaryPrefix
    /AllocationExpression
        [@AnonymousClass=false()]
        [ClassOrInterfaceType/TypeArguments[@Diamond=false() and not($java7Compatibility = true() and .//TypeArgument[@Wildcard=true()])]]
        [not(ArrayDimsAndInits)]

Example(s):

    List<String> strings = new ArrayList<String>(); // unnecessary duplication of type parameters
    List<String> stringsWithDiamond = new ArrayList<>(); // using the diamond operator is more concise

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
java7Compatibility | false | If disabled, the rule shows also violations that are applicable for java8+ | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UseDiamondOperator" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UseDiamondOperator">
        <properties>
            <property name="java7Compatibility" value="false" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## UselessParentheses

Since: PMD 5.0

Priority: Medium Low (4)

Useless parentheses should be removed.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //Expression[not(parent::PrimaryPrefix)]/PrimaryExpression[count(*)>1]
      /PrimaryPrefix/Expression
        [not(./CastExpression)]
        [not(./ConditionalExpression)]
        [not(./AdditiveExpression)]
        [not(./AssignmentOperator)]
    |
    //Expression[not(parent::PrimaryPrefix)]/PrimaryExpression[count(*)=1]
      /PrimaryPrefix/Expression
    |
    //Expression/ConditionalAndExpression/PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/Expression[
        count(*)=1 and
        not(./CastExpression) and
        not(./EqualityExpression/MultiplicativeExpression) and
        not(./ConditionalExpression) and
        not(./ConditionalOrExpression)]
    |
    //Expression/ConditionalOrExpression/PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/Expression[
        count(*)=1 and
        not(./CastExpression) and
        not(./ConditionalExpression) and
        not(./EqualityExpression/MultiplicativeExpression)]
    |
    //Expression/ConditionalExpression/PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/Expression[
        count(*)=1 and
        not(./CastExpression) and
        not(./EqualityExpression)]
    |
    //Expression/AdditiveExpression[not(./PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/Literal[@StringLiteral= true()])]
      /PrimaryExpression[1]/PrimaryPrefix/Expression[
        count(*)=1 and
        not(./CastExpression) and
        not(./AdditiveExpression[@Operator = '-']) and
        not(./ShiftExpression) and
        not(./RelationalExpression) and
        not(./InstanceOfExpression) and
        not(./EqualityExpression) and
        not(./AndExpression) and
        not(./ExclusiveOrExpression) and
        not(./InclusiveOrExpression) and
        not(./ConditionalAndExpression) and
        not(./ConditionalOrExpression) and
        not(./ConditionalExpression)]
    |
    //Expression/EqualityExpression/PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/Expression[
        count(*)=1 and
        not(./CastExpression) and
        not(./AndExpression) and
        not(./InclusiveOrExpression) and
        not(./ExclusiveOrExpression) and
        not(./ConditionalExpression) and
        not(./ConditionalAndExpression) and
        not(./ConditionalOrExpression) and
        not(./EqualityExpression)]

Example(s):

    public class Foo {

        private int _bar1;
        private Integer _bar2;

        public void setBar(int n) {
            _bar1 = Integer.valueOf((n)); // here
            _bar2 = (n); // and here
        }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UselessParentheses" />

## UselessQualifiedThis

Since: PMD 5.4.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Reports qualified this usages in the same class.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //PrimaryExpression
    [PrimaryPrefix/Name[@Image]]
    [PrimarySuffix[@Arguments= false() and @ArrayDereference = false()]]
    [not(PrimarySuffix/MemberSelector)]
    [ancestor::ClassOrInterfaceBodyDeclaration[1][@AnonymousInnerClass= false()]]
    /PrimaryPrefix/Name[@Image = ancestor::ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration[1]/@SimpleName]

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
        final Foo otherFoo = Foo.this;  // use "this" directly

        public void doSomething() {
             final Foo anotherFoo = Foo.this;  // use "this" directly
        }

        private ActionListener returnListener() {
            return new ActionListener() {
                @Override
                public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
                    doSomethingWithQualifiedThis(Foo.this);  // This is fine
                }
            };
        }

        private class Foo3 {
            final Foo myFoo = Foo.this;  // This is fine
        }

        private class Foo2 {
            final Foo2 myFoo2 = Foo2.this;  // Use "this" direclty
        }
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UselessQualifiedThis" />

## UseShortArrayInitializer

Since: PMD 6.15.0

Priority: Medium (3)

When declaring and initializing array fields or variables, it is not necessary to explicitly create a new array using `new`. Instead one can simply define the initial content of the array as a expression in curly braces.

E.g. `int[] x = new int[] { 1, 2, 3 };` can be written as `int[] x = { 1, 2, 3 };`.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //VariableDeclarator
        [VariableDeclaratorId[@ArrayType = true() and @TypeInferred = false()]]
        [VariableInitializer/Expression/PrimaryExpression/PrimaryPrefix/AllocationExpression/ArrayDimsAndInits/ArrayInitializer]

Example(s):

    Foo[] x = new Foo[] { ... }; // Overly verbose
    Foo[] x = { ... }; //Equivalent to above line

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UseShortArrayInitializer" />

## UseUnderscoresInNumericLiterals

Since: PMD 6.10.0

Priority: Medium (3)

Minimum Language Version: Java 1.7

Since Java 1.7, numeric literals can use underscores to separate digits. This rule enforces that numeric literals above a certain length use these underscores to increase readability.

The rule only supports decimal (base 10) literals for now. The acceptable length under which literals are not required to have underscores is configurable via a property. Even under that length, underscores that are misplaced (not making groups of 3 digits) are reported.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //Literal[
         @IntLiteral = true()
      or @LongLiteral = true()
      or @DoubleLiteral = true()
      or @FloatLiteral = true()
    ]
     (: Filter out literals in base other than 10 :)
     [not(matches(@Image, "^0[^.]"))]
     (: Filter out ignored field name :)
     [not(ancestor::VariableDeclarator[1][@Name = 'serialVersionUID'])]
     [
       some $num in tokenize(@Image, "[dDfFlLeE+\-]")
       satisfies not(
                      ( contains($num, ".")
                        and string-length(substring-before($num, ".")) <= $acceptableDecimalLength
                        and string-length(substring-after($num, ".")) <= $acceptableDecimalLength
                        or string-length($num) <= $acceptableDecimalLength
                      )
                      and not(contains($num,"_"))
                      or matches($num, "^[0-9]{1,3}(_[0-9]{3})*(\.([0-9]{3}_)*[0-9]{1,3})?$")
                    )
     ]

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
        private int num = 1000000; // should be 1_000_000
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
acceptableDecimalLength | 4 | Length under which literals in base 10 are not required to have underscores | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UseUnderscoresInNumericLiterals" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UseUnderscoresInNumericLiterals">
        <properties>
            <property name="acceptableDecimalLength" value="4" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## VariableNamingConventions

Deprecated

Since: PMD 1.2

Priority: High (1)

A variable naming conventions rule - customize this to your liking. Currently, it checks for final variables that should be fully capitalized and non-final variables that should not include underscores.

This rule is deprecated and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced by the more general rules `FieldNamingConventions`, `FormalParameterNamingConventions`, and `LocalVariableNamingConventions`.

This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.VariableNamingConventionsRule

Example(s):

    public class Foo {
        public static final int MY_NUM = 0;
        public String myTest = "";
        DataModule dmTest = new DataModule();
    }

This rule has the following properties:

Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued
--- | --- | --- | ---
parameterSuffix |  | Method parameter variable suffixes | yes. Delimiter is ‘,’.
parameterPrefix |  | Method parameter variable prefixes | yes. Delimiter is ‘,’.
localSuffix |  | Local variable suffixes | yes. Delimiter is ‘,’.
localPrefix |  | Local variable prefixes | yes. Delimiter is ‘,’.
memberSuffix |  | Member variable suffixes | yes. Delimiter is ‘,’.
memberPrefix |  | Member variable prefixes | yes. Delimiter is ‘,’.
staticSuffix |  | Static variable suffixes | yes. Delimiter is ‘,’.
staticPrefix |  | Static variable prefixes | yes. Delimiter is ‘,’.
checkMembers | true | Check member variables | no
checkLocals | true | Check local variables | no
checkParameters | true | Check constructor and method parameter variables | no
checkNativeMethodParameters | true | Check method parameter of native methods | no

Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/VariableNamingConventions" />

Use this rule and customize it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/VariableNamingConventions">
        <properties>
            <property name="parameterSuffix" value="" />
            <property name="parameterPrefix" value="" />
            <property name="localSuffix" value="" />
            <property name="localPrefix" value="" />
            <property name="memberSuffix" value="" />
            <property name="memberPrefix" value="" />
            <property name="staticSuffix" value="" />
            <property name="staticPrefix" value="" />
            <property name="checkMembers" value="true" />
            <property name="checkLocals" value="true" />
            <property name="checkParameters" value="true" />
            <property name="checkNativeMethodParameters" value="true" />
        </properties>
    </rule>

## WhileLoopsMustUseBraces

Deprecated

Since: PMD 0.7

Priority: Medium (3)

Avoid using ‘while’ statements without using braces to surround the code block. If the code formatting or indentation is lost then it becomes difficult to separate the code being controlled from the rest.

This rule is deprecated and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced by the rule `ControlStatementBraces`.

This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:

    //WhileStatement[not(Statement/Block)]

Example(s):

    while (true)    // not recommended
          x++;

    while (true) {  // preferred approach
          x++;
    }

Use this rule by referencing it:

    <rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/WhileLoopsMustUseBraces" />