With the major revision 2.0 of VTK-m, many items previously marked as
deprecated were removed. If updating to a new version of VTK-m, it is
recommended to first update to VTK-m 1.9, which will include the deprecated
features but provide warnings (with the right compiler) that will point to
the replacement code. Once the deprecations have been fixed, updating to
2.0 should be smoother.
4ca64f0f0 Back out of DataSet::CopyPartsFromExcept method
2d30e6d45 Coordinate systems are stored as Fields
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Li-Ta Lo <ollie@lanl.gov>
Merge-request: !2920
Previously, `DataSet` managed `CoordinateSystem`s separately from `Field`s.
However, a `CoordinateSystem` is really just a `Field` with some special
attributes. Thus, coordiante systems are now just listed along with the
rest of the fields, and the coordinate systems are simply strings that
point back to the appropriate field. (This was actually the original
concept for `DataSet`, but the coordinate systems were separated from
fields for some now obsolete reasons.)
Previously, point fields compressed by ZFP were attached as point fields
on the output. However, using them as a point field would cause
problems. So, instead attache them as `WholeDataSet` fields.
Also fixed a problem where the 1D decompressor created an output of the
wrong size.
The `VTKM_LOG_SCOPE` macro was not working as intended. It was supposed
to print a log message immediately and then print a second log message
when leaving the scope along with the number of seconds that elapsed
between the two messages.
This was not what was happening. The second log message was being
printed immediately after the first. This is because the scope was taken
inside of the `LogScope` method. The macro has been rewritten to put the
tracking in the right scope.
36e47c9e6 CI: force smoke test to use dev adapter compiler
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Kenneth Moreland <morelandkd@ornl.gov>
Merge-request: !2915
The name of the methods were changed from `AddGhostCellField` to
`SetGhostCellField` since only one field can be marked as the cell
ghost. Also automatically select a field that matches
`GetGlobalCellFieldName` if nothing else is set.
The `no_virtual` setting is no longer supported (because virtual methods
are completely removed from VTK-m), so the setting did nothing. Thus, we
can remove that option from the settings in CI.
09de1c886 Unit test update for default and user-specified ghost field
7414e02b6 added flag for SetGhostCellAsField function
72f8bb9cc Check if default ghost cell field is requested for use
63e7b2336 Set and Get methods for UseGhostCellsAsField
fc44a6100 Added a flag UseGhostCellsAsField for default use
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Kenneth Moreland <morelandkd@ornl.gov>
Merge-request: !2840
f3fa4f127 Allow FieldSelection to simultaneously include and exclude fields
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Li-Ta Lo <ollie@lanl.gov>
Merge-request: !2919
The basic use of `FieldSelection` is to construct the class with a mode
(`None`, `Any`, `Select`, `Exclude`), and then specify particular fields
based off of this mode. This works fine for basic uses where the same code
that constructs a `FieldSelection` sets all the fields.
But what happens, for example, if you have code that takes an existing
`FieldSelection` and wants to exclude the field named `foo`? If the
`FieldSelection` mode happens to be anything other than `Exclude`, the code
would have to go through several hoops to construct a new `FieldSelection`
object with this modified selection.
To make this case easier, `FieldSelection` now has the ability to specify
the mode independently for each field. The `AddField` method now has an
optional mode argument the specifies whether the mode for that field should
be `Select` or `Exclude`.
In the example above, the code can simply add the `foo` field with the
`Exclude` mode. Regardless of whatever state the `FieldSelection` was in
before, it will now report the `foo` field as not selected.
54f0ef2a8 Support providing a Token to ReadPortal and WritePortal
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Li-Ta Lo <ollie@lanl.gov>
Merge-request: !2916
63702d5d1 Check to make sure that the fields in a DataSet are the proper length
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Li-Ta Lo <ollie@lanl.gov>
Merge-request: !2914
aa5687512 Correct the number of points in `SplitSharpEdges` filter
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Abhishek Yenpure <abhi.yenpure@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !2912
It is possible in a `DataSet` to add a point field (or coordinate system)
that has a different number of points than reported in the cell set.
Likewise for the number of cells in cell fields. This is very bad practice
because it is likely to lead to crashes in worklets that are expecting
arrays of an appropriate length.
Although `DataSet` will still allow this, a warning will be added to the
VTK-m logging to alert users of the inconsistency introduced into the
`DataSet`. Since warnings are by default printed to standard error, users
are likely to see it.
