7475c318b VTK-m now uses CMake's future HIP lang for Kokkos+HIP
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Sujin Philip <sujin.philip@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !2351
Many of the fancy `ArrayHandle`s are read-only and therefore connot
really create write portals. Likewise, many `ArrayHandle`s (both read-
only and read/write) have no way to resize themselves. In this case,
implementing the `CreateWritePortal` and `ResizeBuffers` methods in the
`Storage` class was troublesome. Mostly they just threw an exception,
but they also sometimes had to deal with cases where the behavior was
allowed.
To simplify code for developers, this introduces a pair of macros:
`VTKM_STORAGE_NO_RESIZE` and `VTKM_STORAGE_NO_WRITE_PORTAL`. These can
be declared in a `Storage` implementation when the storage has no viable
way to resize itself and create a write portal, respectively.
Having boilerplate code for these methods also helps work around
expected behavior for `ResizeBuffers`. `ResizeBuffers` should silently
work when resizing to the same size. Also `ResizeBuffers` should behave
well when resizing to 0 as that is what `ReleaseResources` does.
The `Variant` class has separate implementations for its move and copy
constructors/assignment operators depending on whether the classes it
holds can be trivially moved. If the objects are trivial, Variant is
trivial as well. However, in the case where the objects are not trivial,
special construction and copying needs to be done.
Previously, the non-trivial `Variant` defined a move constructor that
did a byte copy of the contained object and reset the right hand side
object so that it did not attempt to destroy the object. That usually
works because it guarantees that only one version of the `Variant` will
attempt to destroy the object and its resources should be cleaned up
correctly.
But C++ is a funny language that lets you do weird things. Turns out
there are cases where moving the location of memory for an object
without calling the proper copy method can invalidate the object. For
example, if the object holds a pointer to one of its own members, that
pointer will become invalid. Also, if it points to something that points
back, then the object will need to update those pointers when it is
moved. GCC's version of `std::string` seems to be a type like this.
Solve the problem by simply deleting the move constructors. The copy
constructors and destructor will be called instead to properly manage
the object. A test for these conditions is added to `UnitTestVariant`.
The `Variant` class is templated to hold objects of other types.
Depending on whether those objects of are meant to be used in the
control or execution side, the methods on `Variant` might need to be
declared with (or without) special modifiers. We can sometimes try to
compile the `Variant` methods for both host and device and ask the
device compiler to ignore incompatibilities, but that does not always
work.
To get around that, create two different implementations of `Variant`.
Their API and implementation is exactly the same except one declares its
methods with `VTKM_CONT` and the other its methods `VTKM_EXEC`.
Although `vtkm::internal::Variant` respected the trivially copyable
attribute of the types it contains, it was never totally trivial (i.e.
`std::is_trivial<Variant<...>>` was never true). The reason was that
`Variant` was initializing its `Index` parameter to signify that it was
not initialized. However, the fact that `Index` was initialized meant
that it was not trivially constructed.
Now, `Variant` type checks its types to see if they are all trivially
constructible. If so, it makes itself trivially constructible.
This means that `Index` may or may not be valid if `Variant` is
constructed without an argument. This in turn means that the result of
`Variant::IsValid` becomes undefined. That should be OK in practice.
`Index` will "point" to an uninitialized object, but that object is
trivially constructed anyway. However, that could cause problems if
developers used `IsValid` to determine if something is selected.
As we remove more and more virtual methods from VTK-m, I expect several
users will be interested in completely removing them from the build for
several reasons.
1. They may be compiling for hardware that does not support virtual
methods.
2. They may need to compile for CUDA but need shared libraries.
3. It should go a bit faster.
To enable this, a CMake option named `VTKm_NO_DEPRECATED_VIRTUAL` is
added. It defaults to `OFF`. But when it is `ON`, none of the code that
both uses virtuals and is deprecated will be built.
Currently, only `ArrayHandleVirtual` is deprecated, so the rest of the
virtual classes will still be built. As we move forward, more will be
removed until all virtual method functionality is removed.
c689a68c5 Suppress bad deprecation warnings in MSVC
a3f23a03b Do not cast to ArrayHandleVirtual in VariantArrayHandle::CastAndCall
f6b13df51 Support coordinates of both float32 and float64
453e31404 Deprecate ArrayHandleVirtualCoordinates
be7f06bbe CoordinateSystem data is VariantArrayHandle
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !2177
The Microsoft compiler has this annoying and stupid behavior where if
you have a generic templated method/function and that method is
instantiated with a deprecated class, then the compiler will issue a
C4996 warning even if the calling code is suppressing that warning
(because, for example, you are implementing other deprecated code and
the use is correct). There is no way around this other than suppressing
the warnings for all uses of the templated method.
A recent change to the continuous integration setup has caused
`UnitTestArrayPortalValueReference` to fail on one platform.
The problem was that the test was doing two unsafe things with the
right-shift assignment operator. The first unsafe thing was using itself
as the operand.
```cpp
ref >>= ref;
```
This causes clang to give a "self assign overload" warning. Using a
variable as its own operand for a compute assign operation isn't great
style, but for some operations it can cause weird errors. The reason for
the warning is that for a true integer shift operation, the compiler
will recognize that the result should be 0. So, when using this on base
integer types, you will get 0. But overloads can give you something
different, so that might lead to unexpected results. Because we _are_
using an overload (for the `ArrayPortalValueReference` class), the
compiler tells us we can get potentially unexpected results.
OK. That seems like something we can safely ignore (and were ignoring
for some time). After all, the whole point of the
`ArrayPortalValueReference` operators is to behave exactly the same as
the values they wrap. That brings us to the second unsafe thing the test
was doing: using an invalid value as the right hand operation. And this
is where things get weird.
The test was specifically failing when being run on `Int32`. It was
setting the underlying value for `ref` to be `1000` to start with. So
the expression `ref >>= ref` was trying to right shift `ref` by 1000
bits. Logically, this should of course give you 0. However, shifting a
number by more bits than exist causes undefined behavior (c.f.
https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/INT34-C.+Do+not+shift+an+expression+by+a+negative+number+of+bits+or+by+greater+than+or+equal+to+the+number+of+bits+that+exist+in+the+operand).
You might not get back the expected value, and this is exactly what was
happening.
What I think happened was that the compiler determined that any valid
shift would be contained in 5 bits, so it truncated the value (1000) to
the least signifcant 5 bits (which happens to be 8). It then shifted
1000 by 8 and got the value 3 instead of 0.
The fix picks an operand number that is sure to be valid.
`assert` is supported on recent CUDA cards, but compiling it appears to be
very slow. By default, the `VTKM_ASSERT` macro has been disabled whenever
compiling for a CUDA device (i.e. when `__CUDA_ARCH__` is defined).
Asserts for CUDA devices can be turned back on by turning the
`VTKm_NO_ASSERT_CUDA` CMake variable off. Turning this CMake variable off
will enable assertions in CUDA kernels unless there is another reason
turning off all asserts (such as a release build).
Previously, the ArrayPortalCheck wrapper did not allow access to the
superclass' Get for 3D indices. This solves that problem and also fixes
it for Set (assuming there is ever an instance of that).
Currently, VTK-m is using C++11. However, it is often useful to use
features in the `std` namespace that are defined for C++14 or later. We
can provide our own versions (sometimes), but it is preferable to use
the version provided by the compiler if available.
There were already some examples of defining portable versions of C++14
and C++17 classes in a `vtkmstd` namespace, but these were sprinkled
around the source code.
There is now a top level `vtkmstd` directory and in it are header files
that provide portable versions of these future C++ classes. In each
case, preprocessor macros are used to select which version of the class
to use.
Made a new vtkm::Tuple class to replace tao tuple.
This version of Tuple should hopefully compile faster. Having our own
implementation should also make it easier to port to new devices.
The ArrayPortalWrapper is used for both execution and control portals.
When it was wrapped around a control portal that does not work on CUDA
devices, we were getting ugly warnings even though the intention was
only to use it in the control environment.
To get a portal to access ArrayHandle values in the control
environment, you now use the ReadPortal and WritePortal methods.
The portals returned are wrapped in an ArrayPortalToken object
so that the data between the portal and the ArrayHandle are
guaranteed to be consistent.
b9516c116 Correct CellSetStructured compile failures
00235874d Suppress more warning types from thirdparty includes
a52af2d13 Correct double to float warning in CellAspectFrobeniusMetric
cf5ebfb16 Suppress warning about extension use, since all compilers support it
27739660b Add missing constructors/assignment operators
123f8b01a Mark virtual destructors as override where applicable
54118dfca Use noexcept instead of throw() as it was deprecated in c++11
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Kenneth Moreland <kmorel@sandia.gov>
Merge-request: !1943
Having a custom assignment operator means that the compiler
isn't required to generate the implicit copy constructor.
This makes sure they are constructed.
Fixes#447
This uses a more robust set of checks to determine if std::aligned_union
and std::is_trivially_copyable exist given the libstdc++ version value
4659d69c7 Remove some commented out code
aec75ab1a Suppress CUDA warning about device calling host
851864d0b Work around with Visual Studio 2015 issue
452a2e1c9 Suppress warnings about CUDA host/device mismatch
4fdefe9f1 Suppress some deprecated warnings in visual studio
5cfc14482 Implement old ListTag features with new ListTag implementations
d5fe4046c Remove instances of ListTag in favor of List
92db37623 Convert uses of ListTagBase to List
...
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Robert Maynard <robert.maynard@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !1918
This cleans up the code a bit by removing duplication. More importantly,
it makes sure that the old ListTag functions work with both the new
`List` and old `ListTagBase`.
Previously, the `VTKM_ALWAYS_EXPORT` and `VTKM_NEVER_EXPORT` macros
used the gnu-specific `__attribute__` keyword. This change instead
uses the C++11 standard method of using `[[ ]]` as attributes.
Specifically, `__attribute(visibility("---"))` is changed to
`[[gnu::visibility("--")]]`.
The main impetus for this change is that `__attribute__` does not
seem to work with `[[deprecated]]` on GCC compilers. (For sure on
GCC 6. I didn't check all compiler versions.) This change was
recommended from
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40886628/deprecated-attribute-visibility-default-in-gcc-6-2
This creates a minor backward incompatibility. We have always meant
for these macros to be used before the return type when used with
a function. However, GCC accepted placing `__attribute__` after
the return type. The C++11 `[[ ]]` cannot be placed there, so
some macros might have to be moved. Still, this was a broken
use that happened to work.
A new header named TypeList.h and the type lists have been redefined in
this new file. All the types have been renamed from `TypeListTag*` to
`TypeList*`. TypeListTag.h has been gutted to provide deprecated
versions of the old type list names.
There were also some other type lists that were changed from using the
old `ListTagBase` to the new `List`.
The newer List operations should still work on the old ListTags, so make
those changes first to ensure that everything still works as expected if
given an old ListTag.
Next step is to deprecate ListTagBase itself and move all the lists to
the new types.
`vtkm::List` is meant to replace `vtkm::ListTag`. Rather than
subclassing a base class with a variadic template, all lists expose the
list of types.
`vtkm::ListTag` was originally created before we required C++11 so
supporting variadic templates was problematic. To hide the issue we had,
we made list tags subclass other lists rather than be the list
themselves. It makes for nicer types in the compiler, but hides
important details about what is actually in the type. It also creates
lots of unnecessary new types.
The new `vtkm::List` is in some ways simpler. All lists have to be a
`vtkm::List`. Subclasses are not supported (or rather, they will not
work as expected). All manipulations (such as `vtkm::ListAppend`)
resolve directly back to a `vtkm::List`. Although the types reported by
the compiler will be longer, they will be more specific to the types
being used. Also, the new implimentation should ultimately use fewer
types.
Yet more ways that we can reduce the complexity of `FunctionInterface`.
This is another step in figuring out what set of features the replacement
for `FunctionInterface` needs to have.
