Porting the dax device adapter over to vtkm. Unlike the dax version, doesn't
use the thrust::device_vector, but instead uses thrust::system calls so that
we can support multiple thrust based backends.
Also this has Texture Memory support for input array handles. Some more work
will need to be done to ArrayHandle so that everything works when using an
ArrayHandle inplace with texture memory bindings.
The unit test for StorageBasic tested the StealArray feature and then
used the delete[] operator on the stolen array to deallocate it. For
many standard libraries the default implementation for delete[] is
the same as (or at least compatible with) std::allocator, but for
the PGI compiler they were not compatible and this resulted in a
run-time error. This change fixes the problem with the test by using
the same allocator as the StorageBasic test.
Lots of tests have to move values in and out of arrays and check them
against expected values. It is also often the case that these tests are
run on lots of different types. There is some repeated code for
generating known values for particular indices. This change unifies some
of that. This can probably also encourage making more generic tests.
Providing these types tends to "lock in" the precision of the algorithms
used in VTK-m. Since we are using templating anyway, our templates
should be generic enough to handle difference precision in the data.
Usually the appropriate type can be determined by the data provided. In
the case where there is no hint on the precision of data to use (for
example, in the code that provides coordinates for uniform data), there
is a vtkm::FloatDefault.
Before we assumed that we would only use the basic types specified by
the widths of vtkm::Scalar and vtkm::Id. We want to expand this to make
sure the code works on whatever data precision we need.
Since we want our code to generally handle data of different precision
(for example either float or double) expand the types in our list types
to include multiple precision.
Previously we just hand coded base lists up to 4 entries, which was fine
for what we were using it for. However, now that we want to support base
types of different sizes, we are going to need much longer lists.
There are multiple reasons for this name change:
* The name Tuple conflicts with the boost::Tuple class, which as a
different interface and feature set. This gets confusing, especially
since VTK-m uses boost quite a bit.
* The use of this class is usually (although not always) as a
mathematical vector.
* The vtkm::Scalar and vtkm::Vector* classes are going to go away soon
to better support multiple base data type widths. Having this
abbriviated name will hopefully make the code a bit nicer when these
types have to be explicitly specified.
Also modified the implementation a bit to consolidate some of the code.
In preparation for supporting base types with more widths, add typedefs
for the base types with explicit widths (number of bits).
Also added a IdComponent type that should be used for indices for
components into tuples and vectors. There now should be no reason to use
"int" inside of VTK-m code (especially for indexing). This change cleans
up many of the int types that were used throughout.
This moves the ability to get an iterator from an array portal out of
the portal itself. The next step is to move the GetIteratorBegin/End out
of ArrayPortal. This should make the implemenation a bit cleaner.
MSVC likes to warn about using raw pointers as iterators in generic
algorithms because they have been known to lead to problems. When
compiling with that compiler, wrap raw pointers in
stdext::checked_array_pointer to suppress the error and also add a bit
more checking.
I wanted to test ArrayHandleCounting with some non-standard data type.
I was using a class that looked like a number that counts by two, but
the operator behavior was not a proper group and that was causing issues.
Replaced that with a class that inefficiently represents an unsigned
integer as a string with that many characters. The inefficiency does not
matter because it is just a test.
It appears that when the Intel compiler is optimizing, constant floating
point values can be slightly different than the same value stored in memory
and never changed. This change uses the test_equal method to compare
these floating point values that might have a slight numeric error.
After a talk with Robert Maynard, we decided to change the name
ArrayContainerControl to Storage. There are several reasons for this
change.
1. The name ArrayContainerControl is unwieldy. It is long, hard for
humans to parse, and makes for long lines and wraparound. It is also
hard to distinguish from other names like ArrayHandleFoo and
ArrayExecutionManager.
2. The word container is getting overloaded. For example, there is a
SimplePolymorphicContainer. Container is being used for an object that
literally acts like a container for data. This class really manages
data.
3. The data does not necessarily have to be on the control side.
Implicit containers store the data nowhere. Derivative containers might
have all the real data on the execution side. It is possible in the
future to have storage on the execution environment instead of the
control (think interfacing with a simulator on the GPU).
Storage is not a perfect word (what does implicit storage really mean?),
but its the best English word we came up with.
It was originally put there to support CopyInto in ArrayHandle, but that
has already been removed. It really only makes sense for trivial
examples and testing code, and it sometimes causes complications with
coding.
There is a special version of the testing methods for use in the control
environment that handles execeptions that can be thrown there. There are
tests to make sure you are using the correct version of the testing
framework, but it was broken until the last commit. Now that it's fixed,
here are two places where the wrong testing method was used.
We made this change a while ago to help with completion in IDEs.
(Completion was matching a bunch of wrapper macros that were almost
never used anywhere.) Most of the changes are in comments, but there are
a few bad macro definitions.
Getting the type right for ArrayHandleCompositeVector can be a bit
tricky. It is expressed in a somewhat strange function signature format
and you have to extract the right component type for the return. This
adds an ArrayHandleCompositeVectorType that makes it easier (although no
less verbose).
Each type of point coordinates has its own class with the name
PointCoordinates*. Currently there is a PointCoordiantesArray that contains
an ArrayHandle holding the point coordinates and a PointCoordinatesUniform
that takes the standard extent, origin, and spacing for a uniform rectilinear
grid and defines point coordiantes for that. Creating new PointCoordinates
arrays is pretty easy, and we will almost definitely add more. For example,
we should have an elevation version that takes uniform coordinates for
a 2D grid and then an elevation in the third dimension. We can probably
also use a basic composite point coordinates that can build them from
other coordinates.
There is also a DynamicPointCoordinates class that polymorphically stores
an instance of a PointCoordinates class. It has a CastAndCall method that
behaves like DynamicArrayHandle; it can call a functor with an array handle
(possible implicit) that holds the point coordinates.
This derived array handle creates an array of vectors whose components come
from other arrays of vectors. In either case ArrayHandleCompositeVector
handles scalars as vectors of size 1.
The dynamic array handle holds a reference to an array handle of an
unknown type. It contains the ability to try to cast it to an instance
of array handle or to try lists of types and containers.
There is currently an issue that is causing the test code not to
compile. It is the case that some combinations of types and containers
are not compatible. For example, an implict container is bound to a
certain type, and the container is undefined if they do not agree. There
needs to be a mechanism to detect these invalid combinations and skip
over them in the MTP for each.
Provies a list of types in a template like boost::mpl::vector and a
method to call a functor on each type. However, rather than explicitly
list each type, uses tags to identify the list. This provides the
following main advantages:
1. Can use these type lists without creating horrendously long class
names based on them, making compiler errors easier to read. For example,
you would have a typename like MyClass<TypeListTagVectors> instead of
MyClass<TypeList<Id3,Vector2,Vector3,Vector4> > (or worse if variadic
templates are not supported). This is the main motivation for this
implementation.
2. Do not require variadic templates and usually few constructions. That
should speed compile times.
There is one main disadvantage to this approach: It is difficult to get
a printed list of items in a list during an error. If necessary, it
probably would not be too hard to make a template to convert a tag to a
boost mpl vector.
