There are still some warnings left:
* Some text in markdown files are incorrectly picked up as
doxygen commands
* ArrayPortalTransform weirdly inherits from a specialized
version of itself. It's technically correct C++ code, but
gives doxygen fits.
Sandia National Laboratories recently changed management from the
Sandia Corporation to the National Technology & Engineering Solutions
of Sandia, LLC (NTESS). The copyright statements need to be updated
accordingly.
Previously once an ArrayHandle was stolen it was placed in an invalid state
where it could not used again by VTK-m. Now instead after being stolen it
is placed into a state where it is identical to memory allocated outside
of VTK-m and passed in.
The old templated array transfer mechanism generated a lot of code
that ended up doing a simple, type-agnostic memcpy for most devices.
This patch specialized array handles for basic storage and uses a
fast-path array transfer implementation. This reduces the size of the
vtkm_cont library by 27% on gcc (from 6.2MB to 4.5MB).
The offsets for an ArrayHandleGroupVecVariable are always inputs
and cannot be changed, even when the array handle is used as an output.
There was a mistake where the PrepareFor* methods tried to make
the offsets mutable. In the case of an output, the offsets were not
pushed to the execution environment, and the arrays could not be looked
up.
Class that need to be passed across dynamic library boundaries such as
DynamicArrayHandle need to be properly export. One of 'tricks' of this
is that templated classes such as PolymorphicArrayHandleContainer need
the Type and Storage types to have public visibility.
This makes sure that all vtkm storage tags have public visibility so
in the future we can transfer dynamic array handles across libraries.
Change the VTKM_CONT_EXPORT to VTKM_CONT. (Likewise for EXEC and
EXEC_CONT.) Remove the inline from these macros so that they can be
applied to everything, including implementations in a library.
Because inline is not declared in these modifies, you have to add the
keyword to functions and methods where the implementation is not inlined
in the class.
There were a few places in the source code where
std::numeric_limits::min and max were used. There is an issue with these
methods on windows because the standard libraries there define macros
with the same name. Get around this problem by either places parentheses
so that they do not look like macros or use the vtkm::Infinity methods
instead.
These asserts are consolidated into the unified Assert.h. Also made some
minor edits to add asserts where appropriate and a little bit of
reconfiguring as found.
The storage used will now be aligned to `VTKM_CACHE_LINE_SIZE bytes,
resulting in slightly better cache usage and load/store performance.
This define is set in `StorageBasic.h We also now detect if Posix is
available in Configure.h and will define VTKM_POSIX with _POSIX_VERSION
if it's available.
The AlignedAllocator used by StorageBasic is also STL compatible
and can be used in STL containers so user's can use it in their
std::vector and pass aligned user memory to the storage.
The driving desire for this change was to make vtk-m ArrayHandle behave more
like the standard vector. The canonical example of what we want to support is:
```
std::vector<vtkm::Id> values;
values.resize(100);
vtkm::cont::ArrayHandle<vtkm::Id> array = vtkm::cont::make_ArrayHandle(values);
vtkm::cont::DeviceAdapterAlgorithm<DeviceAdapter>::Sort(array);
```
And with-out the ability to modify user provided memory, this was impossible.
The UserPortal in ArrayHandle was used to copy a pointer the user
created into an ArrayHandle to use in VTK-m algorithms. However, this is
only really valid for a basic storage, so the functionality has been
moved there, and you have to construct an ArrayHandle with a storage
instead of an array portal.
The unit test for StorageBasic tested the StealArray feature and then
used the delete[] operator on the stolen array to deallocate it. For
many standard libraries the default implementation for delete[] is
the same as (or at least compatible with) std::allocator, but for
the PGI compiler they were not compatible and this resulted in a
run-time error. This change fixes the problem with the test by using
the same allocator as the StorageBasic test.
After a talk with Robert Maynard, we decided to change the name
ArrayContainerControl to Storage. There are several reasons for this
change.
1. The name ArrayContainerControl is unwieldy. It is long, hard for
humans to parse, and makes for long lines and wraparound. It is also
hard to distinguish from other names like ArrayHandleFoo and
ArrayExecutionManager.
2. The word container is getting overloaded. For example, there is a
SimplePolymorphicContainer. Container is being used for an object that
literally acts like a container for data. This class really manages
data.
3. The data does not necessarily have to be on the control side.
Implicit containers store the data nowhere. Derivative containers might
have all the real data on the execution side. It is possible in the
future to have storage on the execution environment instead of the
control (think interfacing with a simulator on the GPU).
Storage is not a perfect word (what does implicit storage really mean?),
but its the best English word we came up with.
