The CellSetExplicit and CellSetSingleType classes have an ivar that
marks the number of points. There were several instances of code
creating cell sets without specifying the number of points. This can be
very bad if subsequent code needs that information.
For some reason when VTK-m was being compiled as an accelerator in VTK,
Visual Studio 2013 gave a bunch of warnings about not being able to generate
assignment operators for many classes. This happened for classes with a
const ivar that could not be automatically set. (Automatic copy constructors
are fine on this count.) I'm not sure why these warnings did not happen
when just compiling VTK-m, nor am I sure why they were generated at all as
no code actually used the copy constructors.
This commit fixes the problems by adding a private declaration for assignment
operators that cannot be automatically created. No implementation is
provided, nor should any be needed.
This is a fancy array handle that can group entries in another array by
arbitrary amounts. This allows us to implement input and output arrays
with a different sized Vec for each instance. This is necessary for
generating new topologies with cells of different types.
Change the VTKM_CONT_EXPORT to VTKM_CONT. (Likewise for EXEC and
EXEC_CONT.) Remove the inline from these macros so that they can be
applied to everything, including implementations in a library.
Because inline is not declared in these modifies, you have to add the
keyword to functions and methods where the implementation is not inlined
in the class.
Instead of having two separate implementations of MarchingCubes, we have
a single implementation in worklet, and filter uses that.
That does mean that the version in worklet has been updated to support
merging of duplicate point coordinates.
By restricting the types explicitly in the ControlSignature we reduce
the code bloat, if we ever pass in a DynamicArrayHandle as one of those
parameters.
The two worklets for marching cubes use tables stored in arrays that
have random access. Previously, they arrays were passed using the
ExecObject tag in ControlSignature along with ExecutionWholeArrayConst.
This changes to using a WholeArrayIn tag and just passing the
ArrayHandle directly to the Invoke method. The end result is the same,
but the code is a bit cleaner.
