vtk-m/vtkm/testing/UnitTestPair.cxx

172 lines
5.9 KiB
C++

//============================================================================
// Copyright (c) Kitware, Inc.
// All rights reserved.
// See LICENSE.txt for details.
// This software is distributed WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even
// the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
// PURPOSE. See the above copyright notice for more information.
//
// Copyright 2014 Sandia Corporation.
// Copyright 2014 UT-Battelle, LLC.
// Copyright 2014 Los Alamos National Security.
//
// Under the terms of Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 with Sandia Corporation,
// the U.S. Government retains certain rights in this software.
//
// Under the terms of Contract DE-AC52-06NA25396 with Los Alamos National
// Laboratory (LANL), the U.S. Government retains certain rights in
// this software.
//============================================================================
#include <vtkm/Pair.h>
#include <vtkm/Types.h>
#include <vtkm/VecTraits.h>
#include <vtkm/testing/Testing.h>
namespace {
//general pair test
template <typename T, typename U>
void PairTest( )
{
//test that all the constructors work properly
{
vtkm::Pair<T,U> no_params_pair;
no_params_pair.first = TestValue(12, T());
no_params_pair.second = TestValue(34, U());
vtkm::Pair<T,U> copy_constructor_pair(no_params_pair);
vtkm::Pair<T,U> assignment_pair = no_params_pair;
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (no_params_pair == copy_constructor_pair),
"copy constructor doesn't match default constructor");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(no_params_pair != copy_constructor_pair),
"operator != is working properly");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (no_params_pair == assignment_pair),
"assignment constructor doesn't match default constructor");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(no_params_pair != assignment_pair),
"operator != is working properly");
}
//now lets give each item in the pair some values and do some in depth
//comparisons
T a = TestValue(56, T());
U b = TestValue(78, U());
//test the constructors now with real values
{
vtkm::Pair<T,U> pair_ab(a,b);
vtkm::Pair<T,U> copy_constructor_pair(pair_ab);
vtkm::Pair<T,U> assignment_pair = pair_ab;
vtkm::Pair<T,U> make_p = vtkm::make_Pair(a,b);
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(pair_ab != pair_ab),
"operator != isn't working properly for vtkm::Pair" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_ab == pair_ab),
"operator == isn't working properly for vtkm::Pair" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_ab == copy_constructor_pair),
"copy constructor doesn't match pair constructor");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_ab == assignment_pair),
"assignment constructor doesn't match pair constructor");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT(copy_constructor_pair.first == a,
"first field not set right");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT(assignment_pair.second == b,
"second field not set right");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_ab == make_p),
"make_pair function doesn't match pair constructor");
}
//test the ordering operators <, >, <=, >=
{
//in all cases pair_ab2 is > pair_ab. these verify that if the second
//argument of the pair is different we respond properly
U b2(b);
vtkm::VecTraits<U>::SetComponent(b2,0,
vtkm::VecTraits<U>::GetComponent(b2,0)+1);
vtkm::Pair<T,U> pair_ab2(a,b2);
vtkm::Pair<T,U> pair_ab(a,b);
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_ab2 >= pair_ab), "operator >= failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_ab2 >= pair_ab2), "operator >= failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_ab2 > pair_ab), "operator > failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(pair_ab2 > pair_ab2), "operator > failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(pair_ab2 < pair_ab), "operator < failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(pair_ab2 < pair_ab2), "operator < failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(pair_ab2 <= pair_ab), "operator <= failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_ab2 <= pair_ab2), "operator <= failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(pair_ab2 == pair_ab), "operator == failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_ab2 != pair_ab), "operator != failed" );
T a2(a);
vtkm::VecTraits<T>::SetComponent(a2,0,
vtkm::VecTraits<T>::GetComponent(a2,0)+1);
vtkm::Pair<T,U> pair_a2b(a2,b);
//this way can verify that if the first argument of the pair is different
//we respond properly
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_a2b >= pair_ab), "operator >= failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_a2b >= pair_a2b), "operator >= failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_a2b > pair_ab), "operator > failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(pair_a2b > pair_a2b), "operator > failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(pair_a2b < pair_ab), "operator < failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(pair_a2b < pair_a2b), "operator < failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(pair_a2b <= pair_ab), "operator <= failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_a2b <= pair_a2b), "operator <= failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( !(pair_a2b == pair_ab), "operator == failed" );
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT( (pair_a2b != pair_ab), "operator != failed" );
}
}
template< typename FirstType >
struct DecideSecondType
{
template <typename SecondType> void operator()(const SecondType&) const
{
PairTest<FirstType,SecondType>();
}
};
struct DecideFirstType
{
template <typename T> void operator()(const T&) const
{
//T is our first type for vtkm::Pair, now to figure out the second type
vtkm::testing::Testing::TryTypes(DecideSecondType<T>(),
vtkm::TypeListTagField());
}
};
void TestPair()
{
//we want to test each combination of standard vtkm types in a
//vtkm::Pair, so to do that we dispatch twice on TryTypes. We could
//dispatch on all types, but that gets excessively large and takes a
//long time to compile (although it runs fast). Instead, just select
//a subset of non-trivial combinations.
vtkm::testing::Testing::TryTypes(DecideFirstType(),
vtkm::TypeListTagCommon());
}
} // anonymous namespace
int UnitTestPair(int, char *[])
{
return vtkm::testing::Testing::Run(TestPair);
}