Previously when ApplyPolicyFieldOfType was used in cases where not all
of the types matched not all of the storages, those invalid arrays were
replaced with an ArrayHandleDiscard. This unnecessarily increased the
length of the type names used for the resulting ArrayHandleMultiplexer.
Now, ListTagRemoveIf is used to remove any invalid arrays so that the
resulting ArrayHandleMultiplexer only includes the valid arrays.
Although GCC 4.8 and 4.9 claim to be C++11 compliant, there are a few
C++11 features they do not support. One of these features is
std::is_trivially_copyable. So on these platforms, do not attempt to use
it. Instead, treat nothing as trivially copyable.
The code from the previous commit was causing one of the dashboards,
which is using gcc-7, to produce the following warning:
In file included from ../testing/UnitTestVariant.cxx:11:0:
../Variant.h: In function 'void {anonymous}::TestCopyDestroy()':
../Variant.h:269:5: warning: '<anonymous>' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
this->Storage = std::move(rhs.Storage);
^~~~
At best, this warning is not helpful as it does not seem to point to
anything that could be used uninitialized. At worst, it might be a
compiler bug. A Google search finds a few similar bugs although none I
can assert with any confidence of this issue. However, many reported
bugs and issues point to the use of anonymous namespaces. So, I'm going
to attempt to fix the problem by removing anonymous namespaces.
Hopefully it will fix the warning or at least point me to something
concrete that I can fix.
The Variant template can hold any type. If it is holding a type that is
non-copyable, then it has to make sure that appropriate constructors,
copiers, movers, and destructors are called.
Previously, these were called even the Variant was holding a trivially
copyable class because no harm no foul. If you were holding a trivially
copyable class and did a memcpy, that work work, which should make it
possible to copy between host and device, right?
In theory yes, but in practice no. The problem is that Cuda is
outsmarting the code. It is checking that Variant is not trivially-
copyable by C++ semantics and refusing to push it.
So, change Variant to check to see if all its supported classes are
trivially copyable. If they are, then it use the default constructors,
destructors, movers, and copiers so that C++ recognizes it as trivially
copyable.
79f7f8275 Fix UnitTestError failure
901711bff Fix test failure due to floating point issues
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Robert Maynard <robert.maynard@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !1896
This file was using the Matrix class but not including Matrix.h. When I
tried to use the MeshQuality filter in an example that did not include
Matrix.h on its own, I got a compile error.
If a worklet doesn't explicitly state an ExecutionSignature, VTK-m
assumes the worklet has no return value, and each ControlSignature
argument is passed to the worklet in the same order.
For example if we had this worklet:
```cxx
struct DotProduct : public vtkm::worklet::WorkletMapField
{
using ControlSignature = void(FieldIn, FieldIn, FieldOut);
using ExecutionSignature = void(_1, _2, _3);
template <typename T, vtkm::IdComponent Size>
VTKM_EXEC void operator()(const vtkm::Vec<T, Size>& v1,
const vtkm::Vec<T, Size>& v2,
T& outValue) const
{
outValue = vtkm::Dot(v1, v2);
}
};
```
It can be simplified to be:
```cxx
struct DotProduct : public vtkm::worklet::WorkletMapField
{
using ControlSignature = void(FieldIn, FieldIn, FieldOut);
template <typename T, vtkm::IdComponent Size>
VTKM_EXEC void operator()(const vtkm::Vec<T, Size>& v1,
const vtkm::Vec<T, Size>& v2,
T& outValue) const
{
outValue = vtkm::Dot(v1, v2);
}
};
The older Xcode 9 compiler has troubles with ArrayHandleDecorator that
are similar to those of earlier Microsoft and Cuda compilers.
Note that the logic behind the changed compiler check has a lot of
guesswork involved. I noticed this problem on a laptop with Xcode 9
installed. However, even though Xcode uses the clang compiler, it
notoriously does not return the actual clang version. Instead, it
returns some toolchain version that has nothing to do with it. I'm
pretty sure Xcode 9 is using clang version 4 under the covers, but
__clang_major__ reports 9. Oddly, Xcode 10 reports __clang_major__ as 8,
so that's not too much help. So instead, we check for
__apple_build_version__, which returns the Xcode version (sort of) and
that seems a reasonable comparison.
Although I have not tried it, I'm willing to bet that the older clang
outside of Xcode will also have issues. Here is where the real guesswork
takes place since I don't have handy compilers to try. Like I said, I
think the internet claims that Xcode 9 is using clang 4, so also add to
the check any compiler that reports itself clang 4 or below.
973878b8b Improve the performance of the Image and Graph Connectivity algorithms
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Li-Ta Lo <ollie@lanl.gov>
Merge-request: !1873
The collection of connectivity algorithms had a couple of inefficiencies.
By moving to using WorkId we can remove a couple of arrays of the same size
as the input domain. In addition by moving to using atomics we can remove
an bool output array with a size equivalent to the input domain and
a call to reduce.
The previous implementation of `RuntimeDeviceTracker` occasionally
outputted a log at level `Info` about devices being enabled or disabled.
The problem was that the information given was inconsistent (so it would
sometimes announce one change but not announce a different corrective
change). This could cause weird confusions. For example, when you used a
`ColorTable`, it would use a `ScopedRuntimeDeviceTracker` to temporarily
force the device to `Serial`. The log will just tell you that the device
was forced to `Serial` but never tell you that the devices where
restored to include actual parallel devices.
This change helps correct these with the following changes:
* Added a new log level, `DevicesEnabled`, that is a higher level than
`Info`. All logging from `RuntimeDeviceTracker` goes to this log
level.
* Change the logging output of `RuntimeDeviceTracker` to output a list
of currently enabled devices whenever a change happens. That way you
don't have to guess what happend for each change.
* Change `ScopedRuntimeDeviceTracker` to log whenever the scope is
entered or left.
