Since we don't have explicit template instantiations for CellSetExplicit
and CellSetSingleType we need to mark them as being exported from all
libraries.
18c4190d Update classes using RuntimeDeviceTracker
200928ef Add a global RuntimeDeviceTracker
a3573117 Compile RuntimeDeviceTracker.cxx with CUDA when appropriate
814b2db1 Add the implementation of RuntimeDeviceTracker to cont library
b9d3206e Move RuntimeDeviceTracker to vtkm::cont
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !707
7e34f861 Append newline to ArrayHandle summaries.
6f417a38 Add type information to array summaries and cast/call errors.
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !705
They now grab the global runtime device tracker. In some cases, I've
added the ability to set/get the tracker to change it from the global.
In others I just removed the local copy, since it was just hooked into
the global tracker.
The RuntimeDeviceTracker.cxx contains a library method that queries the
CUDA device, which only works if compiled as a CUDA source file.
This set up will allow code that is not compiled with CUDA use a
RuntimeDeviceTracker with other code that does use CUDA.
The offsets for an ArrayHandleGroupVecVariable are always inputs
and cannot be changed, even when the array handle is used as an output.
There was a mistake where the PrepareFor* methods tried to make
the offsets mutable. In the case of an output, the offsets were not
pushed to the execution environment, and the arrays could not be looked
up.
This allows code to include the RuntimeDeviceTracker without depending
on the device-specific adapters (I think).
Also changed the implementation to use a shared_ptr for the state so you
can pass it around and share the state easier.
Before it was in the vtkm::cont::internal namespace. However, we expect
to be using this feature quite a bit more as we want VTK-m to handle
multiple devices effectively (as in, just figure it out and go).
There are two versions of ArrayRangeCompute. The first version is a
general version that computes the min and max by running a reduction on
a device. The second version was a specialization for uniform grid
coordinate arrays, which is easily computed without looking at the
values.
The problem was that the generic version of ArrayRangeCompute took two
arguments and the specialization only took one argument (because it does
not need a device). This means that templated code uses the general
version will never use the specialized version. This fix adds a device
argument to the specialized version. The extra argument is not used, but
will properly overload the general version.
17ed7a36 Remove typedef that is no longer used
364f4175 Only print cell arrays that are valid
5b8389f9 Use printSummary_ArrayHandle when testing fancy arrays
873ceefc Implement ArrayHandleGroupVecVariable::GetPortalConst
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !695
dcbbb727 Merge branch 'master' into external-face-more-generic
0703139a Make Keys class do in-place sort
059c7f6d Fix issue with ExternalFaces on CellSetSingleType
876514ba Add better test for external faces
53679dfc Update ExternalFaces to support mixed face types
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Brent Lessley <blessley@cs.uoregon.edu>
Merge-request: !662
It was a typedef for a Portal. Instead of setting the portal directly,
the portal is just sent to a function, so we don't directly use this
type anymore.
Not a big deal, but it could cause compiler warnings.
ConnectivityExplicitInternals::PrintSummary blindly attempted to print
all of its arrays regardless of whether they are valid. Trying to print
uninitialized arrays can be invalid in some circumstances. Instead,
check to see of the arrays are valid before printing them out. (This can
give you useful information anyway. There is a difference between an
uninitialized array and one of zero length.)
This makes it easier to see what is going on in the fancy arrays and do
diagnostics.
This change required some changes to printSummary_ArrayHandle to support
more array types.
fc68362d Build benchmarks even when testing is not enabled.
31e20859 Fix typo.
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Robert Maynard <robert.maynard@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !696
Previously it was impossible to get an ArrayPortal from an
ArrayHandleGroupVecVariable on the control side (by calling GetPortal or
GetPortalConst). This makes it possible.
58bbeb18 Support using empty array handles as input
6d5de0c3 Change make_ArrayHandle work with empty std::vector
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Robert Maynard <robert.maynard@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !694
Previously if you constructed an array handle without allocating it, you
would get an error if you tried to use the array as input. This
conflicted with some recent changes to accept empty vectors.
Now when you try to use an unallocated ArrayHandle as input (calling
PrepareForInput or PrepareForInPlace), it internally calls Allocate(0)
(to establish internal state) and sets up a valid execution ArrayPortal
of size 0.
When make_ArrayHandle gets an std::vector, it converts it to an
ArrayHandle by getting a pointer to the vector's internal array.
However, when the vector is of size 0, there is no array and it is
invalid to get a pointer. Instead, make a special case for empty
vectors.
4fc6a6a4 Updating formatting and fixing compiler warnings
00b73b63 Updating formatting and fixing compiler warnings
eee9edde Updating formatting and fixing compiler warnings
6cac1843 Updating formatting and fixing compiler warnings
48d22460 Updating formatting and fixing compiler warnings
19b61a53 Merge branch 'master' into DataSetAddUniform-test-enhance
cefc333a Adding fields to data set builder unit tests to test fields.
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !681
ArrayHandleDiscard is intended to be used for worklets that produce
multiple output arrays when one or more outputs is not needed. It
does not allocate space for its data and the Set method is a no-op,
allowing the compiler to prune unnecessary instructions.
Reading from the array handle is not allowed.
3d2e15b4 Move ComputeRange for ArrayHandle to its own header
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Kenneth Moreland <kmorel@sandia.gov>
Merge-request: !677
5020a848 Add convenience getters for accessing field data by association.
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Robert Maynard <robert.maynard@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !678
The current design for ArrayPortalVirtual makes it a requirement for all
array portals (that it wraps) to have Set defined. Thus, make sure Set is
defined for all ArrayPortal. Where Set is invalid, an assert is thrown if
something calls it at runtime.
The implementation was calling PrepareForOutput on the delegate arrays
rather than PrepareForInPlace, do when used with CUDA you did not get
the data on the device.
Also added a regression test to check this.
This reduces the number of weak vtables vtkm generates, resulting in
a reduction of binary sizes for projects that include vtkm classes in
multiple translation units.
Class that need to be passed across dynamic library boundaries such as
DynamicArrayHandle need to be properly export. One of 'tricks' of this
is that templated classes such as PolymorphicArrayHandleContainer need
the Type and Storage types to have public visibility.
This makes sure that all vtkm storage tags have public visibility so
in the future we can transfer dynamic array handles across libraries.
The CellSetExplicit and CellSetSingleType classes have an ivar that
marks the number of points. There were several instances of code
creating cell sets without specifying the number of points. This can be
very bad if subsequent code needs that information.
f23ff9fa Fix warnings about assignment operators not being generated
7ec8c034 Remove warning about constant conditional in VTKM_ASSUME
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !657
For some reason when VTK-m was being compiled as an accelerator in VTK,
Visual Studio 2013 gave a bunch of warnings about not being able to generate
assignment operators for many classes. This happened for classes with a
const ivar that could not be automatically set. (Automatic copy constructors
are fine on this count.) I'm not sure why these warnings did not happen
when just compiling VTK-m, nor am I sure why they were generated at all as
no code actually used the copy constructors.
This commit fixes the problems by adding a private declaration for assignment
operators that cannot be automatically created. No implementation is
provided, nor should any be needed.
It is common practice to swallow a semicolon in a macro using a do/
while(false) loop that only executes once. However, the Visual Studio
2013 compiler was stupidly warning about having a constant expression
for the loop. Get around the problem by creating our own swallow
semicolon macros that disable this warning as necessary.
This will expose bugs inside the tbb backend. We had to use heap allocations
for test arrays, instead of stack as the new array increases started to
cause stack overflow on windows.
a339f3ac Had to rewrite tbb reduce to correct all the problems.
0120157e Correct tbb reduction algorithm to be correct when using multiple threads.
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !654
Previously, the operator for a Transport class took the object being
transported to the execution environment and the size of the output
domain. This change also passes in the control-side argument for the
input domain. This will help check input array sizes as well as make
other potential transformations based on the input domain.
CellSetExplicit had a constructor that took a single argument that is
the number of points in the data and another constructor that had two
arguments of the number of points and the name. The problem was that the
latter constructor had a default argument for the second argument. Thus,
if you tried to construct a CellSetExplicit with just the number of
points, it would fail to compile because the compiler would not know
which constructor to use.
Fix the issue by removing the single argument constructor.
98c8cb86 Do not attempt to execute CUDA kernels with no blocks
fda3ec71 Don't call std functions in math nonfinte functions for CUDA
55c159d6 Check error codes from CUDA functions
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !632
While writing a test I noticed that some of the MakeTestDataSet
hexahedrons had improper point ordering. It was close but backwards so
that all the faces pointed in instead of out.
I noticed that when I attempted to execute a CUDA kernel with 0 blocks,
it generated a CUDA error. The error did not really matter since nothing
was really supposed to run anyway. However, once we are careful about
checking CUDA errors, it will cause test failures and likely other
misdiagnoses.
