The CellSetExplicit and CellSetSingleType classes have an ivar that
marks the number of points. There were several instances of code
creating cell sets without specifying the number of points. This can be
very bad if subsequent code needs that information.
CellSetExplicit had a constructor that took a single argument that is
the number of points in the data and another constructor that had two
arguments of the number of points and the name. The problem was that the
latter constructor had a default argument for the second argument. Thus,
if you tried to construct a CellSetExplicit with just the number of
points, it would fail to compile because the compiler would not know
which constructor to use.
Fix the issue by removing the single argument constructor.
8a93ecc4 code alignment tweaks.
6fa448b5 Remove the 1D camera. 1D plots will use a 2D camera.
52aa9b9a Fix some compile errors.
23d8d585 Add explicit 1D rendering. Also added some data model suport.
db522c4c Add GetCanvas calls to the mapper classes.
87b1cdca cleanup. Remove some compiler warnings.
d38e6270 Support for 1D rendering.
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !616
Change the VTKM_CONT_EXPORT to VTKM_CONT. (Likewise for EXEC and
EXEC_CONT.) Remove the inline from these macros so that they can be
applied to everything, including implementations in a library.
Because inline is not declared in these modifies, you have to add the
keyword to functions and methods where the implementation is not inlined
in the class.
There are several tests in the cont directory that are in header files so
that they can be recompiled for different devices. Make sure that the
tests are exclusively using the device being tested by making the error
device adapter the default.
If any part of the test tries to use the default device (which could be
different than the one being tested), a compile error will occur. Several
of these compile errors are fixed in this commit.
These asserts are consolidated into the unified Assert.h. Also made some
minor edits to add asserts where appropriate and a little bit of
reconfiguring as found.
f86382f0 Fix support for CoordinateSystems using ArrayHandleCartesianProduct.
d6a2a142 Add toleranced compare for values. Add tests for vtkm::Float32,Float64,Id typed arrays.
5d438353 Add toleranced comparisions for bounds validation. Also, add vtkm::Float32 and vtkm::Float64 to the testing for rectilinear and regular datasets.
b225ae97 Rectilinear coordinates (created with DataSetBuilderRectilinear) are now converted to vtkm::FloatDefault. This reduces the number of types to consider when casting inside CoordinateSystem, and was felt by all to be a reasonable restriction.
d755e43d Use ArrayHandleCompositeVector to represent separated point arrays for DataSetBuilderExplicit.h.
c7b0ffb8 Add tests for DataSetBuilderExplicit. Added cont/testing/ExplicitTestData.h which includes several explicit datasets. These datasets come from VTK data generated in VisIt. The new unit tests build datasets in several different ways and do some basic validation.
b4d04fff Add specialization of printSummary_ArrayHandle for UInt8. It prints them as characters, which are a little hard to understand to this computer scientist.
bd929c20 Fix compiler warnings.
...
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Kenneth Moreland <kmorel@sandia.gov>
Merge-request: !262
The CellSet classes all exclusively work in the control environment.
However, CUDA likes to add __device__ to constructors, destructors, and
assignment operators it automatically adds. This in turn causes warnings
about the __device__ function using host-only classes (like
boost::shared_ptr). Solve this problem by adding explicit methods for
all of these.
When you create a CellSetPermutation you provide an array of the cell ids that
you want to iterate. This allows the user to do custom blanking of a data set,
or to do multi iteration over a set of cells.
Previously if you created a cell set explicit and didn't set the number of
points you would get a runtime error when you over-ran an array's bounds.
Now we account for this use case and properly generate the Cell To Point
Connectivity.
We have been using the term "shape" in the cell set and connectivity
classes. To be consistent, use the term "shape" for the geometric
identify of the cell everywhere.
(Re-) Add a helper structure that holds the connectivity information for
a particular topology connection (e.g. from points to cells) to make it
easier to manage connections in multiple different directions in
CellSetExplicit.
Unlike the previous version of connectivity, this structure is
considered "internal" and not exposed through the API so that
CellSetExplicit can better manage the data. Also, many of the helper
methods remain in CellSetExplicit since they were specific for point-to-
Also, CellSetExplicit has a mechanism to take an arbitrary pair of
TopologyElementTags and get the appropriate connectivity. This should
simplify adding connections in the future.
Most of VTK-m follows the convention of calling the 0D topology elements
"points" (which follows the convention of VTK). However, there were
several places where they were referred to as "nodes." Make things
consistent by calling them points everywhere.
Also merged some redundant ExecutionSignature tags.
Previously there was a Connectivity* structure for both the control
environment and the execution environment. This was necessary before
because the connectivity is explicit to the from and to topology
elements, so you would get this structure from the appropriate call to
CellSet*. However, the symantics are changed so that the type of
connectivity is selected in the worklet's dispatcher. Thus, it is now
much cleaner to manage the CellSet structure in the CellSet class itself
and just have a single set of Connectivity* classes in the execution
environment.
Previously, the items used to identify parts of topology like points,
cells, faces, etc. were in an enumeration. However, they are only really
used in template specialization, and it is easier to use tags in this
case. So, change the enumeration to a set of tag structures. Also made
the following changes:
* Renamed TopologyType to TopologyElement, which is more indicative of
what we are referring to.
* Moved the structures from the vtkm::cont namespace to the vtkm
namespace. There is no reason not to be able to use them from either the
control or execution environments.
* Added a VTKM_IS_TOPOLOGY_ELEMENT_TAG macro to do type checks on
template arguments that are supposed to be topology element tags.
