Previously the arguments to the operator of a vtkm::cont::arg::Transport
were the control object, the input domain object, and the output range.
If you wanted to, for example, check the size of an input array to make
sure it matched the input range, you would have to know the meaning of
the input domain object to query its range. This made it hard to create
generic transports, like TransportTagArrayIn, that accept data from
multiple different input domains but need to know the input range.
The CellSetExplicit and CellSetSingleType classes have an ivar that
marks the number of points. There were several instances of code
creating cell sets without specifying the number of points. This can be
very bad if subsequent code needs that information.
Previously, the operator for a Transport class took the object being
transported to the execution environment and the size of the output
domain. This change also passes in the control-side argument for the
input domain. This will help check input array sizes as well as make
other potential transformations based on the input domain.
Change the VTKM_CONT_EXPORT to VTKM_CONT. (Likewise for EXEC and
EXEC_CONT.) Remove the inline from these macros so that they can be
applied to everything, including implementations in a library.
Because inline is not declared in these modifies, you have to add the
keyword to functions and methods where the implementation is not inlined
in the class.
There were many tests that created code paths for every base and Vec
type that VTK-m supports (up to 4 components). Although this is
admirable, it is also excessive, and our compile times for the tests are
very long.
To shorten compile times, remove the TryAllTypes method. Replace it with
a version of TryTypes that uses a default list of "exemplar" set of
integers, floats, and Vecs.
The WholeArrayIn, WholeArrayInOut, and WholeArrayOut ControlSignature
tags behave similarly to using an ExecObject tag with an
ExecutionWholeArray or ExecutionWholeArrayConst object. However, the
WholeArray* tags can simplify some implementations in two ways. First,
it allows you to specify more precisely what data is passed in. You have
to pass in an ArrayHandle or else an error will occur (as opposed to be
able to pass in any type of execution object). Second, this allows you
to easily pass in arrays stored in DynamicArrayHandle objects. The
Invoke mechanism will automatically find the appropriate static class.
This cannot be done easily with ExecutionWholeArray.
This is to be used in place of BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT so that we can
control its implementation.
The implementation is designed to fix the issue where the latest XCode
clang compiler gives a warning about a unused typedefs when the boost
static assert is used within a function. (This warning also happens when
using the C++11 static_assert keyword.) You can suppress this warning
with _Pragma commands, but _Pragma commands inside a block is not
supported in GCC. The implementation of VTKM_STATIC_ASSERT handles all
current cases.
The boost assert macros seem to have an issue where they define an
unused typedef. This is causing the XCode 7 compiler to issue a warning.
Since the offending code is in a macro, the warning is identified with
the VTK-m header even though the code is in boost. To get around this,
wrap all uses of the boost assert that is causing the warning in the
third party pre/post macros to disable the warning.
Previously, all arrays passed to worklets were designated as either
input or output. No in-place operation was permitted. This change adds
the FieldInOut tag for ControlSignature in both WorkletMapField and
WorkletMapTopology that allows you to read and write from the same
array.
Previously there was a Connectivity* structure for both the control
environment and the execution environment. This was necessary before
because the connectivity is explicit to the from and to topology
elements, so you would get this structure from the appropriate call to
CellSet*. However, the symantics are changed so that the type of
connectivity is selected in the worklet's dispatcher. Thus, it is now
much cleaner to manage the CellSet structure in the CellSet class itself
and just have a single set of Connectivity* classes in the execution
environment.
Previously, the items used to identify parts of topology like points,
cells, faces, etc. were in an enumeration. However, they are only really
used in template specialization, and it is easier to use tags in this
case. So, change the enumeration to a set of tag structures. Also made
the following changes:
* Renamed TopologyType to TopologyElement, which is more indicative of
what we are referring to.
* Moved the structures from the vtkm::cont namespace to the vtkm
namespace. There is no reason not to be able to use them from either the
control or execution environments.
* Added a VTKM_IS_TOPOLOGY_ELEMENT_TAG macro to do type checks on
template arguments that are supposed to be topology element tags.
On one of my compile platforms, GCC was giving conversion warnings from
any boost include that was not wrapped in pragmas to disable conversion
warnings. To make things easier and more robust, I created a pair of
macros, VTKM_BOOST_PRE_INCLUDE and VTKM_BOOST_POST_INCLUDE, that should
be wrapped around any #include of a boost header file.
The Invoke of the topology dispatcher is also changed to expect a
concrete cell set (which the DynamicCellSet is automatically cast to)
rather than a connectivity structure. The dispatcher calls the
GetNodeToCellConnectivity method for you. (That is currently the only
one supported.)
Previously we had accidentally bound the PrepareForInput method to upload
only to the default device adapter, which breaks the use case of allowing
multiple simultaneous backends at runtime.
A couple of tests were failing with the Intel compiler due to
imprecision in comparing floating point values.
Also snuck in some minor documentation fixes in a comment for
FunctionInterface.
It's easy to put accidently put something that is not a valid tag in a
ControlSignature or ExecutionSignature. Previously, when you did that
you got a weird error at the end of a very long template instantiation
chain that made it difficult to find the offending worklet.
This adds some type checks when the dispatcher is instantated to check
the signatures. It doesn't point directly to the signature or its
parameter, but it is much closer.
Instead of just checking that a dispatcher's Invoke input is an
ArrayHandle, also check that the ValueType of the ArrayHandle is
compatible with the types of the worklet operator. This is done by
adding a template argument to the ControlSignature tags that is a type
list tag that gets passed to the type check.
The Transport class is responsible for moving data from the control
environment to the execution environment. (Actually, it might be more
accurate to say it gets the execution environment associated with a
given control object.) The Transport class is templated with a tag that
controls the mechanism used for the transport.