vtk-m2/vtkm/cont/testing/TestingComputeRange.h
Kenneth Moreland 7d681fb585 Deprecate templated versions of Field::GetRange
Instead, always use precompiled versions of range computing. This means
you won't be able to specify the type. Currently, types are limited to
scalars vecs up to size 4.

The main motivation for this change is to allow you to include Field.h
with a non-device compiler. This is an important feature for our
customers.

I plan in the future to implement a mechanism to pull out a component of
most ArrayHandle's as a single array. This would enable us to support a
precompiled version that can compute the range of arbitrarily sized
Vecs.
2020-11-09 12:28:29 -07:00

165 lines
5.9 KiB
C++

//============================================================================
// Copyright (c) Kitware, Inc.
// All rights reserved.
// See LICENSE.txt for details.
//
// This software is distributed WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even
// the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
// PURPOSE. See the above copyright notice for more information.
//============================================================================
#ifndef vtk_m_cont_testing_TestingComputeRange_h
#define vtk_m_cont_testing_TestingComputeRange_h
#include <vtkm/Types.h>
#include <vtkm/cont/CoordinateSystem.h>
#include <vtkm/cont/Field.h>
#include <vtkm/cont/RuntimeDeviceTracker.h>
#include <vtkm/cont/testing/Testing.h>
// Required for implementation of ArrayRangeCompute for virtual arrays
#include <vtkm/cont/ArrayRangeComputeTemplate.h>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <random>
namespace vtkm
{
namespace cont
{
namespace testing
{
using CustomTypeList = vtkm::List<vtkm::Vec<Int32, 3>,
vtkm::Vec<Int64, 3>,
vtkm::Vec<Float32, 3>,
vtkm::Vec<Float64, 3>,
vtkm::Vec<Int32, 9>,
vtkm::Vec<Int64, 9>,
vtkm::Vec<Float32, 9>,
vtkm::Vec<Float64, 9>>;
template <typename DeviceAdapterTag>
class TestingComputeRange
{
private:
template <typename T>
static void TestScalarField()
{
const vtkm::Id nvals = 11;
T data[nvals] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0 };
std::random_device rng;
std::mt19937 urng(rng());
std::shuffle(data, data + nvals, urng);
auto field = vtkm::cont::make_Field(
"TestField", vtkm::cont::Field::Association::POINTS, data, nvals, vtkm::CopyFlag::Off);
vtkm::Range result;
field.GetRange(&result);
std::cout << result << std::endl;
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT((test_equal(result.Min, -5.0) && test_equal(result.Max, 5.0)),
"Unexpected scalar field range.");
}
template <typename T, vtkm::IdComponent NumberOfComponents>
static void TestVecField()
{
const vtkm::Id nvals = 11;
T data[nvals] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0 };
vtkm::Vec<T, NumberOfComponents> fieldData[nvals];
std::random_device rng;
std::mt19937 urng(rng());
for (vtkm::IdComponent i = 0; i < NumberOfComponents; ++i)
{
std::shuffle(data, data + nvals, urng);
for (vtkm::Id j = 0; j < nvals; ++j)
{
fieldData[j][i] = data[j];
}
}
auto field = vtkm::cont::make_Field(
"TestField", vtkm::cont::Field::Association::POINTS, fieldData, nvals, vtkm::CopyFlag::Off);
vtkm::Range result[NumberOfComponents];
field.GetRange(result);
for (vtkm::IdComponent i = 0; i < NumberOfComponents; ++i)
{
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT((test_equal(result[i].Min, -5.0) && test_equal(result[i].Max, 5.0)),
"Unexpected vector field range.");
}
}
static void TestUniformCoordinateField()
{
vtkm::cont::CoordinateSystem field("TestField",
vtkm::Id3(10, 20, 5),
vtkm::Vec3f(0.0f, -5.0f, 4.0f),
vtkm::Vec3f(1.0f, 0.5f, 2.0f));
vtkm::Bounds result = field.GetBounds();
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT(test_equal(result.X.Min, 0.0), "Min x wrong.");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT(test_equal(result.X.Max, 9.0), "Max x wrong.");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT(test_equal(result.Y.Min, -5.0), "Min y wrong.");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT(test_equal(result.Y.Max, 4.5), "Max y wrong.");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT(test_equal(result.Z.Min, 4.0), "Min z wrong.");
VTKM_TEST_ASSERT(test_equal(result.Z.Max, 12.0), "Max z wrong.");
}
struct TestAll
{
VTKM_CONT void operator()() const
{
std::cout << "Testing (Int32, 1)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestScalarField<vtkm::Int32>();
std::cout << "Testing (Int64, 1)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestScalarField<vtkm::Int64>();
std::cout << "Testing (Float32, 1)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestScalarField<vtkm::Float32>();
std::cout << "Testing (Float64, 1)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestScalarField<vtkm::Float64>();
std::cout << "Testing (Int32, 3)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestVecField<vtkm::Int32, 3>();
std::cout << "Testing (Int64, 3)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestVecField<vtkm::Int64, 3>();
std::cout << "Testing (Float32, 3)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestVecField<vtkm::Float32, 3>();
std::cout << "Testing (Float64, 3)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestVecField<vtkm::Float64, 3>();
// TODO: These tests are temporarily disabled because the existing version of
// Field::GetRange does not compute the ranges for vectors of size 9. However,
// issue #575 would fix this issue. This test should be renabled when that is
// implemented.
#if 0
std::cout << "Testing (Int32, 9)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestVecField<vtkm::Int32, 9>();
std::cout << "Testing (Int64, 9)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestVecField<vtkm::Int64, 9>();
std::cout << "Testing (Float32, 9)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestVecField<vtkm::Float32, 9>();
std::cout << "Testing (Float64, 9)..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestVecField<vtkm::Float64, 9>();
#endif
std::cout << "Testing UniformPointCoords..." << std::endl;
TestingComputeRange::TestUniformCoordinateField();
}
};
public:
static VTKM_CONT int Run(int argc, char* argv[])
{
vtkm::cont::GetRuntimeDeviceTracker().ForceDevice(DeviceAdapterTag());
return vtkm::cont::testing::Testing::Run(TestAll(), argc, argv);
}
};
}
}
} // namespace vtkm::cont::testing
#endif //vtk_m_cont_testing_TestingComputeRange_h