vtk-m2/vtkm/filter/MarchingCubes.hxx
Robert Maynard 73440ccb4e vtkm::filter::MarchingCubes now uses vtkm::worklet
Instead of having two separate implementations of MarchingCubes, we have
a single implementation in worklet, and filter uses that.

That does mean that the version in worklet has been updated to support
merging of duplicate point coordinates.
2016-07-28 08:52:34 -04:00

149 lines
5.1 KiB
C++

//============================================================================
// Copyright (c) Kitware, Inc.
// All rights reserved.
// See LICENSE.txt for details.
// This software is distributed WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even
// the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
// PURPOSE. See the above copyright notice for more information.
//
// Copyright 2014 Sandia Corporation.
// Copyright 2014 UT-Battelle, LLC.
// Copyright 2014 Los Alamos National Security.
//
// Under the terms of Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 with Sandia Corporation,
// the U.S. Government retains certain rights in this software.
//
// Under the terms of Contract DE-AC52-06NA25396 with Los Alamos National
// Laboratory (LANL), the U.S. Government retains certain rights in
// this software.
//============================================================================
#include <vtkm/cont/ArrayHandleIndex.h>
#include <vtkm/cont/DynamicCellSet.h>
#include <vtkm/cont/CellSetSingleType.h>
#include <vtkm/worklet/DispatcherMapTopology.h>
#include <vtkm/worklet/ScatterCounting.h>
namespace vtkm {
namespace filter {
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
MarchingCubes::MarchingCubes():
vtkm::filter::FilterDataSetWithField<MarchingCubes>(),
IsoValue(0),
GenerateNormals(false),
Worklet()
{
// todo: keep an instance of marching cubes worklet as a member variable
}
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
template<typename T,
typename StorageType,
typename DerivedPolicy,
typename DeviceAdapter>
vtkm::filter::ResultDataSet MarchingCubes::DoExecute(const vtkm::cont::DataSet& input,
const vtkm::cont::ArrayHandle<T, StorageType>& field,
const vtkm::filter::FieldMetadata& fieldMeta,
const vtkm::filter::PolicyBase<DerivedPolicy>& policy,
const DeviceAdapter& device)
{
if(fieldMeta.IsPointField() == false)
{
//todo: we need to mark this as a failure of input, not a failure
//of the algorithm
return vtkm::filter::ResultDataSet();
}
//get the cells and coordinates of the dataset
const vtkm::cont::DynamicCellSet& cells =
input.GetCellSet(this->GetActiveCellSetIndex());
const vtkm::cont::CoordinateSystem& coords =
input.GetCoordinateSystem(this->GetActiveCoordinateSystemIndex());
typedef vtkm::cont::ArrayHandle< vtkm::Vec< vtkm::FloatDefault,3> > Vec3HandleType;
Vec3HandleType vertices;
Vec3HandleType normals;
vtkm::cont::DataSet output;
vtkm::cont::CellSetSingleType< > outputCells;
//not sold on this as we have to generate more signatures for the
//worklet with the design
//But I think we should get this to compile before we tinker with
//a more efficient api
if(this->GenerateNormals)
{
outputCells =
this->Worklet.Run( static_cast<T>(this->IsoValue),
vtkm::filter::ApplyPolicy(cells, policy),
vtkm::filter::ApplyPolicy(coords, policy),
field,
vertices,
normals,
device
);
}
else
{
outputCells =
this->Worklet.Run( static_cast<T>(this->IsoValue),
vtkm::filter::ApplyPolicy(cells, policy),
vtkm::filter::ApplyPolicy(coords, policy),
field,
vertices,
device
);
}
if(this->GenerateNormals)
{
vtkm::cont::Field normalField(std::string("normals"),
vtkm::cont::Field::ASSOC_POINTS, normals);
output.AddField( normalField );
}
//assign the connectivity to the cell set
output.AddCellSet( outputCells );
//add the coordinates to the output dataset
vtkm::cont::CoordinateSystem outputCoords("coordinates", vertices);
output.AddCoordinateSystem( outputCoords );
return vtkm::filter::ResultDataSet(output);
}
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
template<typename T,
typename StorageType,
typename DerivedPolicy,
typename DeviceAdapter>
bool MarchingCubes::DoMapField(vtkm::filter::ResultDataSet& result,
const vtkm::cont::ArrayHandle<T, StorageType>& input,
const vtkm::filter::FieldMetadata& fieldMeta,
const vtkm::filter::PolicyBase<DerivedPolicy>&,
const DeviceAdapter& device)
{
if(fieldMeta.IsPointField() == false)
{
//not a point field, we can't map it
return false;
}
vtkm::cont::ArrayHandle<T> output;
this->Worklet.MapFieldOntoIsosurface( input, output, device);
//use the same meta data as the input so we get the same field name, etc.
result.GetDataSet().AddField( fieldMeta.AsField(output) );
return true;
}
}
} // namespace vtkm::filter