`ActiveModel::TestCase` is used only for the test of Active Model.
Also, it is a private API and can not be used in applications.
Therefore, it is not necessary to include it in lib.
- Improve CHANGELOG entry for #18439.
- The documentation is updated as per changes in PR #18439 to the
`accept` option.
- The explanation about the virtual attribute is moved at the end so
that the arity of `accept` option is explained first.
- Added a note that `message` can also be passed to `validates_acceptance_of`.
- Pass object to I18n helper so that when calling message proc, it will
pass that object as argument to the proc and we can generate custom
error messages based on current record being validated.
- Based on https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/856.
[Łukasz Bandzarewicz, Prathamesh Sonpatki]
While the type definition is in Active Model the change of behavior will
be only user facing in Active Record so better to put the entry in its
changelog.
[ci skip]
During the `5.0.0.beta1` release, the CHANGELOGs got an entry like the
following:
```
* No changes.
```
It is kinda confusing as there are indeed changes after it. Not a
biggie, just a small pass over the CHANGELOGs.
[ci skip]
Move from `AS::Callbacks::CallbackChain.halt_and_display_warning_on_return_false`
to `AS::Callbacks.halt_and_display_warning_on_return_false` base on
[this
discussion](https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/21218#discussion_r39354580)
Fix the documentation broken by 0a120a818d413c64ff9867125f0b03788fc306f8
Example:
```ruby
class Person
include ActiveModel::Validations
attr_reader :name, :title
validates_presence_of :name, on: :create
validates_presence_of :title, on: :update
end
person = Person.new
person.valid?([:create, :update]) # => true
person.errors.messages # => {:name=>["can't be blank"], :title=>["can't be blank"]}
```
This reverts commit 51dd2588433457960cca592d5b5dac6e0537feac, reversing
changes made to ecb4e4b21b3222b823fa24d4a0598b1f2f63ecfb.
This broke Active Record tests
Case :- 1. In case of email confirmation one needs case insensitive comparison
2. In case of password confirmation one needs case sensitive comparison
[ci skip] Update Guides for case_sensitive option in confirmation validation
Example:
```ruby
class Person
include ActiveModel::Validations
attr_reader :name, :title
validates_presence_of :name, on: :create
validates_presence_of :title, on: :update
end
person = Person.new
person.valid?([:create, :update]) # => true
person.errors.messages # => {:name=>["can't be blank"], :title=>["can't be blank"]}
```
`ActiveModel::Dirty#[attr_name]_previous_change` to improve access
to recorded changes after the model has been saved.
It makes the dirty-attributes query methods consistent before and after
saving.
As demonstrated by #19570, this option is severely limited, and
satisfies an extremely specific use case. Realistically, there's not
much reason for this option to exist. Its functionality can be trivially
replicated with a normal Ruby method. Let's deprecate this option, in
favor of the simpler solution.
