This commit moves a test from `test/template` to `test/activerecord` since the
test depends on ActiveRecord.
This matches the documentation from [RUNNING_UNIT_TESTS](f28d1ddd50/actionview/RUNNING_UNIT_TESTS.rdoc):
> Test cases in the test/activerecord/ directory depend on having activerecord and sqlite3 installed.
> If Active Record is not in actionview/../activerecord directory, or the sqlite3 rubygem is not installed, these tests are skipped.
> Other tests are runnable from a fresh copy of actionview without any configuration.
---
More details about this commit.
All the tests starting with `require 'active_record_unit'` are already
inside `test/activerecord`, except for the one test this commit moves.
If you don't have `active_record` on your machine, the following command
currently fails on master:
```bash
```
I grepped the source code for code snippets wrapped in backticks in the comments
and replaced the backticks with plus signs so they are correctly displayed in
the Rails documentation.
[ci skip]
Since 06388b0 `form_tag` accepts the option `enforce_utf8` which, when set to
false, prevents the hidden "UTF8 enforcer" field from appearing in the output.
This commit implements the same behavior for `form_for`.
Stems from https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/17685#issuecomment-63871395
The [current documentation of form_for](http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/FormHelper.html#method-i-form_for) is incomplete:
> The rightmost argument to form_for is an optional hash of options -
> :url - The URL the form is to be submitted to. This may be represented in the same way as values passed to url_for or link_to. So for example you may use a named route directly. When the model is represented by a string or symbol, as in the example above, if the :url option is not specified, by default the form will be sent back to the current url (We will describe below an alternative resource-oriented usage of form_for in which the URL does not need to be specified explicitly).
> :namespace - A namespace for your form to ensure uniqueness of id attributes on form elements. The namespace attribute will be prefixed with underscore on the generated HTML id.
> :html - Optional HTML attributes for the form tag.
This commit completes the documentation by specifying that:
* `:authenticity_token` is also a valid option (as [documented here](b0f44c9ff0/actionview/lib/action_view/helpers/form_helper.rb (L396)))
* `:method` is also a valid option (as [tested here](b0f44c9ff0/actionview/test/template/form_helper_test.rb (L1819)))
* `:remote` is also a valid option (as [tested here](b0f44c9ff0/actionview/test/template/form_helper_test.rb (L1850)))
[ci skip]
This reverts commit f93df52845766216f0fe36a4586f8abad505cac4, reversing
changes made to a455e3f4e9dbfb9630d47878e1239bc424fb7d13.
Conflicts:
actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_case.rb
actionview/lib/action_view/test_case.rb
This patch uniformizes warning messages. I used the most common style
already present in the code base:
* Capitalize the first word.
* End the message with a full stop.
* "Rails 5" instead of "Rails 5.0".
* Backticks for method names and inline code.
Also, converted a few long strings into the new heredoc convention.
The current style for warning messages without newlines uses
concatenation of string literals with manual trailing spaces
where needed.
Heredocs have better readability, and with `squish` we can still
produce a single line.
This is a similar use case to the one that motivated defining
`strip_heredoc`, heredocs are super clean.
Update select_tag to reflect documentation and behave the same as form builder select. If the value of include_blank is not boolean true, use that value as the option label.
This commit fixes the behavior of `file_field_tag` and `password_field_tag`
when invoked with a hash of options.
These two helpers are different from all the other ones in that they modify the
options hash passed as a parameter, whereas all the other helpers duplicate it
before updating it.
The result is that *bad things* can happen if the user re-uses the same hash.
For instance, users who write the following code to display a file field
followed by a text field (both with the same class):
```rhtml
<% options = {class: 'important'} %>
<%= file_field_tag 'Upload', options %>
<%= text_field_tag 'Name', options %>
```
would instead see **two file fields!**
```html
<input class="important" id="Upload" name="Upload" type="file">
<input class="important" id="Name" name="Name" type="file" value="value">
```
This PR replaces `update` with `merge` in the code of the two helpers,
fixing the issue above.
The included test verifies the change, since it passes after this PR, but
fails before with the following error:
```
Expected: <input type="text" name="title" id="title" value="Hello!" class="important" />
Actual: <input type="password" name="title" id="title" value="Hello!" class="important" />
```
All the methods that invoke `text_field_tag` (such as `hidden_field_tag`)
and all the methods that invoke `number_field_tag` (that is `range_field_tag`)
do not need to call `stringify_keys` on their `options` parameter since the
`text_field_tag` method [is already doing it internally](4159134524/actionview/lib/action_view/helpers/form_tag_helper.rb (L182)):
```ruby
def text_field_tag(name, value = nil, options = {})
tag :input, { "type" => "text", "name" => name, "id" => sanitize_to_id(name), "value" => value }.update(options.stringify_keys)
end
```
and `number_field_tag` is [already doing it internally](e3207bdbba/actionview/lib/action_view/helpers/form_tag_helper.rb (L780)) as well:
```ruby
def number_field_tag(name, value = nil, options = {})
options = options.stringify_keys
...
end
[Note #1: My code uses `merge` to respect the existing behavior of
duplicating the `options` hash before updating its keys, see https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/17096#issuecomment-57223827]
[Note #2: My code uses symbols instead of strings (e.g.: `:hidden`) to look
forward to future version of Ruby/Raiks (GC symbols); the result of the method,
however, is the same, because the symbols are stringified inside `text_field_tag`]
[Note #3: I had previously created a similar PR #17096 but decided to
split it into multiple PRs given the feedback received in the comments]
HTML doesn't care what order the elements are rendered in, so why should we?
Updates tests to use proper `assert_dom_equal` instead of `assert_equal` /cc @jeremy
Since we want this flag to be enabled anytime we are running the tests
under JRuby, let's enable this at the Rakefile level so people get the
performance boost on their local checkout.
Moreover, we avoid having to update this particular line anytime the
option changes on the JRuby side.
The only drawback is that we have to define it in every Rakefile but
there's no big deal, this is already the case for other options.
abstract_unit.rb requires `action_controller` which [already includes the following lines of code](64fcdce1d3/actionpack/lib/action_controller.rb (L2L3)):
```ruby
require 'abstract_controller'
require 'action_dispatch'
```
