Previously default translation keys that didn't end in `_html`, but came
after a missing key that ended in `_html` were being returned as
html_safe. Now they are not. Fixes#18257
Given the following templates:
mailer/demo.html.erb
mailer/demo.en.html.erb
mailer/demo.pt.html.erb
Before this change for a locale that doesn't have its related file
the `mailer/demo.html.erb` will
be rendered even if `en` is the default locale.
Now `mailer/demo.en.html.erb` has precedence over the file without
locale.
Also, it is possible to give a fallback.
mailer/demo.pt.html.erb
mailer/demo.pt-BR.html.erb
So if the locale is `pt-PT`, `mailer/demo.pt.html.erb` will be
rendered given the right I18n fallback configuration.
Fixes#11884.
Previously, if you tried to use form_for with a presenter object
that implements to_model, it would crash in
action_dispatch/routing/polymorphic_routes.rb when asking the presenter
whether it is .persisted?
Now, we always ask .persisted? of the to_model object instead.
This seems to been an issue since 1606fc9d840da869a60213bc889da6fcf1fdc431
Signed-off-by: Eugenia Dellapenna <eugenia.dellapenna@gmail.com>
before this PR IDENTIFIER_ERROR_MESSAGE could lead to misunderstand the convention of partial name.
Added OPTION_AS_ERROR_MESSAGE for unvalid charter in as option.
This commit intends to clarify the scope of ActionView::RecordIdentifier
methods `dom_id` and `dom_class`.
Most of the current documentation comes from da257eb8 (7 years ago) when
the decoupling of ActionView, ActiveRecord and ActiveModel was not a concern.
Since then, steps have been taken to reach such decoupling, especially
8ca17926 which duplicated ActionController::ModelNaming into
ActionView::ModelNaming explaining that:
> These are just a simple helpers for decoupling Active Model, so it does not
> make sense to extract it to Active Support, but the point is to decouple also
> Action View and Action Pack
As of today, ActionView::RecordIdentifier only includes `dom_id` and `dom_class`
so it makes sense to explicitly document those two methods, and leaving the
details of helpers like `div_for` in the corresponding files.
Moreover, I think it's important to mention in the documentation that
ActionView::RecordIdentifier **does not strictly depend on the ActiveRecord API**: any class `Post` implementing `post.to_key` and `post.model_name.param_key` will work.
[ci skip]
This commit intends to clarify the scope of ActionView::RecordIdentifier
methods `dom_id` and `dom_class`.
Most of the current documentation comes from da257eb8 (7 years ago) when
the decoupling of ActionView, ActiveRecord and ActiveModel was not a concern.
Since then, steps have been taken to reach such decoupling.
Therefore I think it's important to show that ActionView::RecordIdentifier
**does not strictly depend on the ActiveRecord API**:
any class `Post` implementing `post.to_key` and `post.model_name.param_key`
will work.
This commit adds a test to prove that ActionView::RecordIdentifier methods
can also be used on objects that do not subclass ActiveRecord::Base.
The `Sheep` fixture was added in eb23754e when moving template tests
from actionpack to actionview, but it's not actually used in ActionView tests.
The `Sheep` fixture is only used to test `uncountable` in ActiveModel tests,
and is already defined in activemodel/test/models/sheep.rb
After c2fe093, which was reverted yesterday, there will likely be
future PRs to address #17661.
The test `actionview/test/template/capture_helper_test.rb
#test_capture_returns_nil_if_the_returned_value_is_not_a_string` should
have errored with c2fe093, but it was rewritten in the PR to not raise.
My guess is that it may have seemed irrelevant to the content_tag tests
or already covered by them.
This test provides additional protection by being in the content_tag
test suite to explicitly raise a red flag in future cases. It foregoes
some redundancy for safety — at least until #17661 is closed.
This has been discussed in #17661 and partially reverts the changes made
in 9de83050d3a4b260d4aeb5d09ec4eb64f913ba64 and 986cac73e3c56b3dfa22fd1464f6913e38d32cc3
The test case added to content_for acts as a regression / acceptance test.
The `test/fixtures/happy_path/render_action/hello_world.erb` file was
introduced in 8ab37c7 for the `TestRenderAction` test.
That test was subsequently removed in 34f058e, so the fixture is not
used anymore.
If Travis CI is happy, then you can be sure the fixture can be removed.
