This allows the test to mirror the production code, since `via: :all` is
a valid option. The behavior in 4.1 did not actually test that it
matched all verbs, but instead defaulted to testing for "GET". This
implementation aims to better handle the intention of passing "all".
What will actually be asserted doesn't quite match up with the generated
route, since it appears to just not create a constraint on the method.
However, I don't think that we can easily test the lack of that
constraint. Testing each of the main 4 HTTP verbs seems to be a
reasonably close approximation, which should be sufficient for our
needs.
Fixes#18511.
Previously env was duplicated and then had it's keys mutated. This iterates through
the hash twice.
Using `transform_keys`, duplication and key mutation is a single iteration.
`convert_symbols` was renamed to `http_header_format`.
Rack is very carefully released, we should be able to upgrade minor
versions without much effort. We are a bunch of Rails core who are also
Rack core members so there won't be any issue with that. And in case
there's something wrong, we should fix on both sides.
Even though, doesn't seem like we will have a 1.7 version, this will be
useful as an example for when we go with Rack 2.0. We should ~> 2.0.
When `render` was moved from ActionPack to ActionView in acc8e259,
some fixtures required by the tests were duplicated, but they are
actually only required by ActionView tests.
To give one example, `double_render` is already defined [in the AV tests](72139d8d31/actionview/test/actionpack/controller/render_test.rb (L407))
and is never used in the ActionPack tests.
The new test/docs further explain the conflicts that can happen when
mixing `:if`/`:unless` options with `:only`/`:except` options in
`skip_before_action`.
The gist is that "positive" filters always have priority over negative
ones.
The previous commit already showed that `:only` has priority over `:if`.
This commit shows that `:if` has priority over `:except`.
For instance, the following snippets are equivalent:
```ruby
skip_before_action :some_callback, if: -> { condition }, except: action
```
```ruby
skip_before_action :some_callback, if: -> { condition }
```
Test case for using skip_before_filter with the options :only and :if
both present. In this case, the :if option will be ignored and :only
will be executed.
Closes#14549 (the commit was cherry-picked from there).
It is clearer and closer to reality to use `@article.updated_at` as
the `:last_modified` parameter of `fresh_when` and `stale?`.
Using `@article.created_at` would result in the cache never expiring,
since the creation timestamp never changes.
[ci skip]
Introduce explicit way of halting callback chains by throwing :abort. Deprecate current implicit behavior of halting callback chains by returning `false` in apps ported to Rails 5.0. Completely remove that behavior in brand new Rails 5.0 apps.
Conflicts:
railties/CHANGELOG.md
This commit changes arguments and default value of CallbackChain's :terminator
option.
After this commit, Chains of callbacks defined **without** an explicit
`:terminator` option will be halted as soon as a `before_` callback throws
`:abort`.
Chains of callbacks defined **with** a `:terminator` option will maintain their
existing behavior of halting as soon as a `before_` callback matches the
terminator's expectation. For instance, ActiveModel's callbacks will still
halt the chain when a `before_` callback returns `false`.
Commit 20fece1 introduced the `_status_code` method to fix calls to
`head :ok`. This method has been added on both ActionController::Metal
and ActionDispatch::Response.
As for the latter, this method is just equivalent to the `response_code`
one so commit aefec3c removed it from the `Reponse` object so call to
the `_status_code` method on an ActionController::Base instance would be
handled by the `Metal` class (which `Base` inherits from) but the status
code is not updated according to the response at this level.
The fix is to actually rely on `response_code` for ActionController::Base
instances but this method doesn't exist for bare Metal controllers so we
need to define it.
Previously, if you tried to use form_for with a presenter object
that implements to_model, it would crash in
action_dispatch/routing/polymorphic_routes.rb when asking the presenter
whether it is .persisted?
Now, we always ask .persisted? of the to_model object instead.
This seems to been an issue since 1606fc9d840da869a60213bc889da6fcf1fdc431
Signed-off-by: Eugenia Dellapenna <eugenia.dellapenna@gmail.com>
existing example. [ci skip]
My reasoning is that this is probably too much information for the complete
Rails testing guide, as we're trying to cover testing all aspects of the
framework.
The methods in these modules are not used anywhere. They used to be
invoked in polymorphic_routes.rb but their usage was removed in e821045.
What is your opinion about removing these methods?
They do belong to the public API, but in reality their code has already been duplicated to ActionView::ModelNaming, since they are used by methods like `dom_id` and `dom_class` to associated records with DOM elements (in
ActionView).
Please tell me if you think that removing this module is a good idea and,
in that case, if the PR is okay as it is, or you'd rather start by showing
a deprecation message, and remove the module in Rails 5.1.
The current implementation of `variants=` don't allow a resetting to nil, wich is the default value.
This results in the following code smell:
```ruby
case request.user_agent
when /iPhone/
request.variants = :phone
when /iPad/
request.variants = :ipad
end
```
With the ability to reset variants to nil, it could be:
```ruby
request.variants = case request.user_agent
when /iPhone/
:phone
when /iPad/
:ipad
end
```
When an `around_action` does not `yield`, then the corresponding action is
*never* executed and the `after_` actions are *never* invoked.
The value returned by the `around_action` does not have any impact on this:
an `around_action` can "return" `true`, `false`, or `"pizza"`, but as long
as `yield` is not invoked, the corresponding action and after callbacks are
not executed.
The test suite for `ActionController::Callbacks` currently includes separate
tests to distinguish the cases in which a non-yielding `around_actions` returns
`true` or `false`.
In my opinion, having such tests is misleading, giving the impression that the
returned value might have some sort of impact, while it does not. At least
that's the impression I got when I read those tests.
For completeness, the tests were introduced 7 years ago by @NZKoz in e80fabb.
There is no need to subtract one from the path_params size when there is
no format parameter because it is not present in the path_params array.
Fixes#17819.
As suggested in #16299([1]), this method should be a new public API for
retrieving unfiltered parameters from `ActionController::Parameters`
object, given that `Parameters#to_hash` will no longer work in Rails
5.0+ as we stop inheriting `Parameters` from `Hash`.
[1]: https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/16299#issuecomment-50220919
This fixes a regression in 4.2.0 from 4.1.8.
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/17823 fixed a similar regression regarding _explicitly_ named routes for a mounted Rack app, but there was another regression for the default value.
With a route like:
Rails.application.routes.draw do
mount Mountable::Web, at: 'some_route'
end
The "Prefix" column of rake routes gives the following:
- 4.1.8: mountable_web
- 4.2.0.beta1-4: [nothing]
- 4.2.0.rc1: [nothing]
- 4.2.0.rc2: some_route <- regression
This fixes the default to go back to being based off the name of the class like the docs specify: 785d04e310/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/routing/mapper.rb (L558-L560)
Explicitly named routes still work correctly per https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/17823:
Rails.application.routes.draw do
mount Mountable::Web, at: 'some_route', as: 'named'
end
- 4.1.8: named
- 4.2.0.beta1-4: [nothing]
- 4.2.0.rc1: [nothing]
- 4.2.0.rc2: named
Some `require 'openssl'` statements were surrounded by `rescue` blocks to deal with Ruby versions that did not support `OpenSSL::Digest::SHA1` or `OpenSSL::PKCS5`.
[As @jeremy explains](a6a0904fcb (commitcomment-8826666)) in the original commit:
> If jruby didn't have jruby-openssl gem, the require wouldn't work. Not sure whether either of these are still relevant today.
According to the [release notes for JRuby 1.7.13](http://www.jruby.org/2014/06/24/jruby-1-7-13.html):
> jruby-openssl 0.9.5 bundled
which means the above `rescue` block is not needed anymore.
All the Ruby versions supported by the current version of Rails provide those OpenSSL libraries, so Travis CI should also be happy by removing the `rescue` blocks.
---
Just to confirm, with JRuby:
$ ruby --version #=> jruby 1.7.16.1 (1.9.3p392) 2014-10-28 4e93f31 on Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_20-b26 +jit [darwin-x86_64]
$ irb
irb(main):001:0> require 'openssl' #=> true
irb(main):002:0> OpenSSL::Digest::SHA1 #=> OpenSSL::Digest::SHA1
irb(main):003:0> OpenSSL::PKCS5 # => OpenSSL::PKCS5
And with Ruby 2.1:
$ ruby --version #=> ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-darwin13.0]
$ irb
irb(main):001:0> require 'openssl' #=> true
irb(main):002:0> OpenSSL::Digest::SHA1 #=> OpenSSL::Digest::SHA1
irb(main):003:0> OpenSSL::PKCS5 #=> OpenSSL::PKCS5
Closes#17615#17616
when script_name is nil in the options hash, script_name is set to nil.
options = {script_name: nil}
script_name = options.delete(:script_name) {‘’} # => nil
Signed-off-by: Santiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
This will help you debug missing template errors, especially if they
come from a programmatic template selection. Thanks to @dhh for
suggesting that.
As a bonus, also show request and response info on the routing error
page for consistency.
If the route set is empty, or if none of the routes matches with a score > 0,
there is no point showing the deprecation message because we are already be
raising the `ActionController::UrlGenerationError` mentioned in the warning.
In this case it is the expected behavior and the user wouldn't have to take any
actions.
The internal tests that (incorrectly) relied on this were already fixed in
938d130. However, we cannot simply fix this bug because the guides prior to
b7b9e92 recommended a workaround that relies on this buggy behavior.
Reference #17453
I grepped the source code for code snippets wrapped in backticks in the comments
and replaced the backticks with plus signs so they are correctly displayed in
the Rails documentation.
[ci skip]
This reverts commit f93df52845766216f0fe36a4586f8abad505cac4, reversing
changes made to a455e3f4e9dbfb9630d47878e1239bc424fb7d13.
Conflicts:
actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_case.rb
actionview/lib/action_view/test_case.rb
If a trace isn't an application one, then it comes from a framework.
That's the definition of framework trace. We can speed up the traces
generation if we don't double check that.
Since dbcbbcf2bc58e8971672b143d1c52c0244e33f26 the full trace is shown
by default on routing errors. While this is a nice feature to have, it
does take the attention off the routes table in this view and I think
this is what most of the people look for in this page.
Added an exception to the default trace switching rule to remove that
noise.
Those three can be nil when exception backtrace is nil. This happens and
that forced a couple of nil guards in the code. I'm proposing to make
those always return an array, even on nil backtrace.
We added a deprecation warning for these cases in aa1fadd, so these are now
causing deprecation warnings in the test output. AFAICT, in these two cases, the
option is not integral to the purpose of the test, so they can be safely removed
Follow up to 212057b9. Since that commit, we need to pass the `route_name`
explicitly. This is one of the left-over cases that was not handled in that
commit, which was causing `use_route` to be ignored in functional tests.
- `secrets.secret_token` is now used in all places `config.secret_token` was
- `secrets.secret_token`, when not present in `config/secrets.yml`,
now falls back to the value of `config.secret_token`
- when `secrets.secret_token` is set, it over-writes
`config.secret_token` so they are the same (for backwards-compatibility)
- Update docs to reference app.secrets in all places
- Remove references to `config.secret_token`, `config.secret_key_base`
- Warn that missing secret_key_base is deprecated
- Add tests for secret_token, key_generator, and message_verifier
- the legacy key generator is used with the message verifier when
secrets.secret_key_base is blank and secret_token is set
- app.key_generator raises when neither secrets.secret_key_base nor
secret_token are set
- app.env_config raises when neither secrets.secret_key_base nor
secret_token are set
- Add changelog
Run focused tests via
ruby -w -Itest test/application/configuration_test.rb -n '/secret_|key_/'
This patch uniformizes warning messages. I used the most common style
already present in the code base:
* Capitalize the first word.
* End the message with a full stop.
* "Rails 5" instead of "Rails 5.0".
* Backticks for method names and inline code.
Also, converted a few long strings into the new heredoc convention.
The current style for warning messages without newlines uses
concatenation of string literals with manual trailing spaces
where needed.
Heredocs have better readability, and with `squish` we can still
produce a single line.
This is a similar use case to the one that motivated defining
`strip_heredoc`, heredocs are super clean.
In cases where this option is set to `true`, the option is redundant and can
be safely removed; otherwise, the corresponding `*_url` helper should be
used instead.
Fixes#17294.
See also #17363.
[Dan Olson, Godfrey Chan]
Performance optimization: `yield` with an implicit `block` is faster than `block.call`.
See http://youtu.be/fGFM_UrSp70?t=10m35s and the following benchmark:
```ruby
require 'benchmark/ips'
def fast
yield
end
def slow(&block)
block.call
end
Benchmark.ips do |x|
x.report('fast') { fast{} }
x.report('slow') { slow{} }
end
# => fast 154095 i/100ms
# => slow 71454 i/100ms
# =>
# => fast 7511067.8 (±5.0%) i/s - 37445085 in 4.999660s
# => slow 1227576.9 (±6.8%) i/s - 6145044 in 5.028356s
```
