447b6a4e67
Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails
made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base.
After some discussion in
5ea6b0df9a
we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough
for this particular idiom.
In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes
include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the
way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case
statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked
the most in each case.
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Ruby
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Ruby
# encoding: utf-8
|
|
require 'abstract_unit'
|
|
require 'active_support/inflector/transliterate'
|
|
|
|
class TransliterateTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
|
|
|
|
def test_transliterate_should_not_change_ascii_chars
|
|
(0..127).each do |byte|
|
|
char = [byte].pack("U")
|
|
assert_equal char, ActiveSupport::Inflector.transliterate(char)
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_transliterate_should_approximate_ascii
|
|
# create string with range of Unicode"s western characters with
|
|
# diacritics, excluding the division and multiplication signs which for
|
|
# some reason or other are floating in the middle of all the letters.
|
|
string = (0xC0..0x17E).to_a.reject {|c| [0xD7, 0xF7].include?(c)}.pack("U*")
|
|
string.each_char do |char|
|
|
assert_match %r{^[a-zA-Z']*$}, ActiveSupport::Inflector.transliterate(string)
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_transliterate_should_work_with_custom_i18n_rules_and_uncomposed_utf8
|
|
char = [117, 776].pack("U*") # "ü" as ASCII "u" plus COMBINING DIAERESIS
|
|
I18n.backend.store_translations(:de, :i18n => {:transliterate => {:rule => {"ü" => "ue"}}})
|
|
I18n.locale = :de
|
|
assert_equal "ue", ActiveSupport::Inflector.transliterate(char)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_transliterate_should_allow_a_custom_replacement_char
|
|
assert_equal "a*b", ActiveSupport::Inflector.transliterate("a索b", "*")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|