Fix own mistake in D1120: wrong indexing of UV maps during tangent calculation
This commit is contained in:
parent
42b26206c6
commit
5494ea1d08
@ -3269,17 +3269,18 @@ void DM_calc_loop_tangents_step_0(
|
||||
bool *rcalc_act, bool *rcalc_ren, int *ract_uv_n, int *rren_uv_n,
|
||||
char *ract_uv_name, char *rren_uv_name, char *rtangent_mask) {
|
||||
/* Active uv in viewport */
|
||||
int layer_index = CustomData_get_layer_index(loopData, CD_MLOOPUV);
|
||||
*ract_uv_n = CustomData_get_active_layer(loopData, CD_MLOOPUV);
|
||||
ract_uv_name[0] = 0;
|
||||
if (*ract_uv_n != -1) {
|
||||
strcpy(ract_uv_name, loopData->layers[*ract_uv_n].name);
|
||||
strcpy(ract_uv_name, loopData->layers[*ract_uv_n + layer_index].name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Active tangent in render */
|
||||
*rren_uv_n = CustomData_get_render_layer(loopData, CD_MLOOPUV);
|
||||
rren_uv_name[0] = 0;
|
||||
if (*rren_uv_n != -1) {
|
||||
strcpy(rren_uv_name, loopData->layers[*rren_uv_n].name);
|
||||
strcpy(rren_uv_name, loopData->layers[*rren_uv_n + layer_index].name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If active tangent not in tangent_names we take it into account */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user