Since https://github.com/lkl/linux/pull/394 cptofs preserves the source time,
which is 1970-01-01T00:00:01Z for /nix/store and recent for other files.
This reverts commit f5b3f2c5a7f2b51e80ac32fb47fd1d7d3e475ad1.
This fixes#28768 because during an image build, Nix sees bad store
timestamps and attempts to fix them, but can't fix them on a running
system (due to being inside a builder). Since timestamps on the store
are supposed to be 1 anyway, if we fix this, that fixes image building
inside booted images made this way.
Note that this adds quite a bit of noise to the output, because running
`cptofs` under `faketime` causes a bunch of seemingly spurious error
messages and my attempts to suppress them all failed. We'll fix it when
`cptofs` gets a native timestamp preservation feature.
The error got introduced by 4f3d971ef55b82ef349e5fb198196d2028fc0cf5,
which removed the *Text attributes from the option.
This in turn leads to an evaluation error while building the
manual/manpage, because oraclejre8 is marked unfree.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
Cc: @jbgi, @orivej, @globin
This is required by the new c5.* instance types.
Note that this changes disk names from /dev/xvd* to
/dev/nvme0n*. Amazon Linux has a udev rule that calls a Python script
named "ec2nvme-nsid" to create compatibility symlinks. We could use
that, but it would mean adding Python to the AMI closure...
Only the Oracle JRE is supported by Atlassian appsAtlassian apps
(see https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRASERVER-46152)
Plus Atlassian apps are non free so the switch logic always chose
Oracle JRE anyway.
Option is kept in case someone want to patch apps to support openjdk.
I don't know where this comes from (I accidentally did that as well
once), but some derivations seem to use `buildPhases` rather than
`phases` in their derivations.
This kills all improper usages as the lack of a `phases` argument
didn't break the build, so this can be safely removed.
This reverts commit 93c54acf97077567e8d6135a36f191e872b26692.
This reopens#30517 @nbp @Ma27
Breaking people's config for this is hardly reasonable as is. If it
absolutely cannot be avoided, at the very least, we need to provide
clear instructions on what people need to upgrade in their config. I
actually had to bisect to the commit, to even find out what property I
should change or define, as the error message was useless. It didn't
even mention a property name.
Discussion on the PR seems to be ongoing, so I'm reverting this, so we
don't break people's systems on unstable.
