previously one of the tests would fail with
boot-after-install: starting vm
Path length (109) is longer than maximum supported length (108) and will be truncated at /nix/store/0ingn8cwwnl84i374hcl6nafsm2c5m2p-perl-5.28.0/lib/perl5/5.28.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Socket.pm line 872, <__ANONIO__> line 268.
boot-after-install# qemu-system-x86_64: -monitor unix:./monitor: Failed to connect socket ./monitor: No such file or directory
error: QEMU died prematurely
QEMU died prematurely
vde_switch: EOF on stdin, cleaning up and exiting
cleaning up
builder for '/nix/store/zbpxwwxwy7f6z5z3kg4nf5mjqsywzjvx-vm-test-run-installer-filesystemEncryptedWithKeyfile.drv' failed with exit code 4
Shortening the test name fixes the issue.
This will make the list much easier to re-use, eg. for `nixosTests`
The drawback is that this approaches makes the
```
nix-build release.nix -A tests.opensmtpd.x86_64-linux
```
command about twice as slow (3s to 6s): it now has to evaluate `nixpkgs`
once for each architecture, instead of just having the hardcoded list of
tests that allowed to say “ok just evaluate for x86_64-linux”.
On the other hand, complete evaluation of `release.nix` should be much
faster because we no longer import `nixpkgs` for each test: testing with
the following command went from 30s to 18s, and that's just for a few
tests.
```
time nix-instantiate --eval --strict nixos/release.nix -A tests.nat
```
I initially wanted to test on the whole `release.nix`, but there are too
many broken tests and it takes too long to eval them all, especially
compared to the fact that the current implementation breaks some setup.
Given developers can just `nix-build nixos/tests/my-test.nix`, it sounds
like an overall win.
The `rmilter` module has options for configuring `postfix` to use it but
since that module is deprecated because rspamd now has a builtin worker
that supports the milter protocol this commit adds similar `postfix`
integration options directly to the `rspamd` module.
The lines stored in `extraConfig` and `worker.<name?>.extraConfig`
should take precedent over values from included files but in order to do
this in rspamd UCL they need to be stored in a file that then gets
included with a high priority. This commit uses the overrides option to
store the value of the two `extraConfig` options in `extra-config.inc`
and `worker-<name?>.inc` respectively.
When the workers option for rspamd was originally implemented it was
based on a flawed understanding of how workers are configured in rspamd.
This meant that while rspamd supports configuring multiple workers of
the same type, so that different controller workers could have different
passwords, the NixOS module did not support this because it would write
an invalid configuration file if you tried.
Specifically a configuration like the one below:
```
workers.controller = {};
workers.controller2 = {
type = "controller";
};
```
Would result in a rspamd configuration of:
```
worker {
type = "controller";
count = 1;
.include "$CONFDIR/worker-controller.inc"
}
worker "controller2" {
type = "controller";
count = 1;
}
```
While to get multiple controller workers it should instead be:
```
worker "controller" {
type = "controller";
count = 1;
.include "$CONFDIR/worker-controller.inc"
}
worker "controller" {
type = "controller";
count = 1;
}
```
When implementing #49620 I included an enable option for both the
locals and overrides options but the code writing the files didn't
actually look at enable and so would write the file regardless of its
value. I also set the type to loaOf which should have been attrsOf
since the code was not written to handle the options being lists.
This fixes both of those issues.
This module permits to preload Docker image in a VM in order to reduce
OIs on file copies. This module has to be only used in testing
environments, when the test requires several Docker images such as in
Kubernetes tests. In this case,
`virtualisation.dockerPreloader.images` can replace the
`services.kubernetes.kubelet.seedDockerImages` options.
The idea is to populate the /var/lib/docker directory by mounting qcow
files (we uses qcow file to avoid permission issues) that contain images.
For each image specified in
config.virtualisation.dockerPreloader.images:
1. The image is loaded by Docker in a VM
2. The resulting /var/lib/docker is written to a QCOW file
This set of QCOW files can then be used to populate the
/var/lib/docker:
1. Each QCOW is mounted in the VM
2. Symlink are created from these mount points to /var/lib/docker
3. A /var/lib/docker/image/overlay2/repositories.json file is generated
4. The docker daemon is started.
As reported by @andir, the regular expressions that match the sandbox
output are no longer matching in the recent Chromium bump as of
bb03fbc2c8b97ef5a4f4205eee51029155164b8a.
Instead of a boolean field that determines whether namespace sandboxes
are on, the namespace sandbox is now an enum within "Layer 1 Sandbox".
I've modified the regular expressions accordingly and also ran the test
for the stable branch, which now succeeds.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
Issue: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/49442
Cc: @bendlas, @andir
By default rspamd will look for multiple files in /etc/rspamd/local.d
and /etc/rspamd/override.d to be included in subsections of the merged
final config for rspamd. Most of the config snippets in the official
rspamd documentation are made to these files and so it makes sense for
NixOS to support them and this is what this commit does.
As part of rspamd 1.8.1 support was added for having custom Lua
rules stored in $LOCAL_CONFDIR/rspamd.local.lua which means that it is
now possible for NixOS to support such rules and so this commit also
adds support for this to the rspamd module.
Rationale
---------
Currently, tests are hard to discover. For instance, someone updating
`dovecot` might not notice that the interaction of `dovecot` with
`opensmtpd` is handled in the `opensmtpd.nix` test.
And even for someone updating `opensmtpd`, it requires manual work to go
check in `nixos/tests` whether there is actually a test, especially
given not so many packages in `nixpkgs` have tests and this is thus most
of the time useless.
Finally, for the reviewer, it is much easier to check that the “Tested
via one or more NixOS test(s)” has been checked if the file modified
already includes the list of relevant tests.
Implementation
--------------
Currently, this commit only adds the metadata in the package. Each
element of the `meta.tests` attribute is a derivation that, when it
builds successfully, means the test has passed (ie. following the same
convention as NixOS tests).
Future Work
-----------
In the future, the tools could be made aware of this `meta.tests`
attribute, and for instance a `--with-tests` could be added to
`nix-build` so that it also builds all the tests. Or a `--without-tests`
to build without all the tests. @Profpatsch described in his NixCon talk
such systems.
Another thing that would help in the future would be the possibility to
reasonably easily have cross-derivation nix tests without the whole
NixOS VM stack. @7c6f434c already proposed such a system.
This RFC currently handles none of these concerns. Only the addition of
`meta.tests` as metadata to be used by maintainers to remember to run
relevant tests.