730a9a04fa
This was removed in e29b0da9c7492732e0dc5730c3da754baa57a1a2, because
it was felt it was ambiguous whether isBSD should remove Darwin.
I think it should be reintroduced. Packages sometimes have their own
concepts of "is BSD" e.g. Lua, and these almost never include Darwin,
so let's keep Darwin excluded.
Without a way to say "is this BSD", one has to list all flavours of
BSD seperately, even though fundamentally they're still extremely
similar. I don't want to have to write the following!
stdenv.isFreeBSD || stdenv.isNetBSD || stdenv.isOpenBSD || stdenv.isDragonFlyBSD
Additionally, we've had stdenv.hostPlatform.isBSD this whole time, and
it hasn't hurt anything.
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| cross | ||
| custom | ||
| cygwin | ||
| darwin | ||
| freebsd | ||
| generic | ||
| linux | ||
| native | ||
| nix | ||
| adapters.nix | ||
| booter.nix | ||
| common-path.nix | ||
| default.nix | ||