blender/intern/cycles/kernel/geom/geom_bvh_traversal.h

358 lines
11 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Adapted from code Copyright 2009-2010 NVIDIA Corporation,
* and code copyright 2009-2012 Intel Corporation
*
* Modifications Copyright 2011-2013, Blender Foundation.
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
/* This is a template BVH traversal function, where various features can be
* enabled/disabled. This way we can compile optimized versions for each case
* without new features slowing things down.
*
* BVH_INSTANCING: object instancing
* BVH_HAIR: hair curve rendering
* BVH_HAIR_MINIMUM_WIDTH: hair curve rendering with minimum width
* BVH_MOTION: motion blur rendering
*
*/
#define FEATURE(f) (((BVH_FUNCTION_FEATURES) & (f)) != 0)
ccl_device bool BVH_FUNCTION_NAME
(KernelGlobals *kg, const Ray *ray, Intersection *isect, const uint visibility
#if FEATURE(BVH_HAIR_MINIMUM_WIDTH)
, uint *lcg_state, float difl, float extmax
#endif
)
{
/* todo:
* - test if pushing distance on the stack helps (for non shadow rays)
* - separate version for shadow rays
* - likely and unlikely for if() statements
* - test restrict attribute for pointers
*/
/* traversal stack in CUDA thread-local memory */
int traversalStack[BVH_STACK_SIZE];
traversalStack[0] = ENTRYPOINT_SENTINEL;
/* traversal variables in registers */
int stackPtr = 0;
int nodeAddr = kernel_data.bvh.root;
/* ray parameters in registers */
float3 P = ray->P;
float3 dir = bvh_clamp_direction(ray->D);
float3 idir = bvh_inverse_direction(dir);
int object = OBJECT_NONE;
#if FEATURE(BVH_MOTION)
Transform ob_tfm;
#endif
Cycles: shadow function optimization for transparent shadows (CPU only). Old algorithm: Raytrace from one transparent surface to the next step by step. To minimize overhead in cases where we don't need transparent shadows, we first trace a regular shadow ray. We check if the hit primitive was potentially transparent, and only in that case start marching. this gives extra ray cast for the cases were we do want transparency. New algorithm: We trace a single ray. If it hits any opaque surface, or more than a given number of transparent surfaces is hit, then we consider the geometry to be entirely blocked. If not, all transparent surfaces will be recorded and we will shade them one by one to determine how much light is blocked. This all happens in one scene intersection function. Recording all hits works well in some cases but may be slower in others. If we have many semi-transparent hairs, one intersection may be faster because you'd be reinteresecting the same hairs a lot with each step otherwise. If however there is mostly binary transparency then we may be recording many unnecessary intersections when one of the first surfaces blocks all light. We found that this helps quite nicely in some scenes, on koro.blend this can give a 50% reduction in render time, on the pabellon barcelona scene and a forest scene with transparent leaves it was 30%. Some other files rendered maybe 1% or 2% slower, but this seems a reasonable tradeoff. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D473
2014-04-19 15:02:30 +00:00
isect->t = ray->t;
isect->object = OBJECT_NONE;
isect->prim = PRIM_NONE;
isect->u = 0.0f;
isect->v = 0.0f;
#if defined(__KERNEL_SSE2__)
const shuffle_swap_t shuf_identity = shuffle_swap_identity();
const shuffle_swap_t shuf_swap = shuffle_swap_swap();
const ssef pn = cast(ssei(0, 0, 0x80000000, 0x80000000));
ssef Psplat[3], idirsplat[3];
shuffle_swap_t shufflexyz[3];
Psplat[0] = ssef(P.x);
Psplat[1] = ssef(P.y);
Psplat[2] = ssef(P.z);
ssef tsplat(0.0f, 0.0f, -isect->t, -isect->t);
gen_idirsplat_swap(pn, shuf_identity, shuf_swap, idir, idirsplat, shufflexyz);
#endif
/* traversal loop */
do {
2014-05-05 02:29:28 +00:00
do {
/* traverse internal nodes */
2014-05-05 02:29:28 +00:00
while(nodeAddr >= 0 && nodeAddr != ENTRYPOINT_SENTINEL) {
bool traverseChild0, traverseChild1;
int nodeAddrChild1;
#if !defined(__KERNEL_SSE2__)
/* Intersect two child bounding boxes, non-SSE version */
float t = isect->t;
/* fetch node data */
float4 node0 = kernel_tex_fetch(__bvh_nodes, nodeAddr*BVH_NODE_SIZE+0);
float4 node1 = kernel_tex_fetch(__bvh_nodes, nodeAddr*BVH_NODE_SIZE+1);
float4 node2 = kernel_tex_fetch(__bvh_nodes, nodeAddr*BVH_NODE_SIZE+2);
float4 cnodes = kernel_tex_fetch(__bvh_nodes, nodeAddr*BVH_NODE_SIZE+3);
/* intersect ray against child nodes */
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c0lox = (node0.x - P.x) * idir.x;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c0hix = (node0.z - P.x) * idir.x;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c0loy = (node1.x - P.y) * idir.y;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c0hiy = (node1.z - P.y) * idir.y;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c0loz = (node2.x - P.z) * idir.z;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c0hiz = (node2.z - P.z) * idir.z;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c0min = max4(min(c0lox, c0hix), min(c0loy, c0hiy), min(c0loz, c0hiz), 0.0f);
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c0max = min4(max(c0lox, c0hix), max(c0loy, c0hiy), max(c0loz, c0hiz), t);
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c1lox = (node0.y - P.x) * idir.x;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c1hix = (node0.w - P.x) * idir.x;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c1loy = (node1.y - P.y) * idir.y;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c1hiy = (node1.w - P.y) * idir.y;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c1loz = (node2.y - P.z) * idir.z;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c1hiz = (node2.w - P.z) * idir.z;
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c1min = max4(min(c1lox, c1hix), min(c1loy, c1hiy), min(c1loz, c1hiz), 0.0f);
NO_EXTENDED_PRECISION float c1max = min4(max(c1lox, c1hix), max(c1loy, c1hiy), max(c1loz, c1hiz), t);
#if FEATURE(BVH_HAIR_MINIMUM_WIDTH)
if(difl != 0.0f) {
float hdiff = 1.0f + difl;
float ldiff = 1.0f - difl;
if(__float_as_int(cnodes.z) & PATH_RAY_CURVE) {
c0min = max(ldiff * c0min, c0min - extmax);
c0max = min(hdiff * c0max, c0max + extmax);
}
if(__float_as_int(cnodes.w) & PATH_RAY_CURVE) {
c1min = max(ldiff * c1min, c1min - extmax);
c1max = min(hdiff * c1max, c1max + extmax);
}
}
#endif
/* decide which nodes to traverse next */
#ifdef __VISIBILITY_FLAG__
/* this visibility test gives a 5% performance hit, how to solve? */
traverseChild0 = (c0max >= c0min) && (__float_as_uint(cnodes.z) & visibility);
traverseChild1 = (c1max >= c1min) && (__float_as_uint(cnodes.w) & visibility);
#else
traverseChild0 = (c0max >= c0min);
traverseChild1 = (c1max >= c1min);
#endif
#else // __KERNEL_SSE2__
/* Intersect two child bounding boxes, SSE3 version adapted from Embree */
/* fetch node data */
const ssef *bvh_nodes = (ssef*)kg->__bvh_nodes.data + nodeAddr*BVH_NODE_SIZE;
const float4 cnodes = ((float4*)bvh_nodes)[3];
/* intersect ray against child nodes */
const ssef tminmaxx = (shuffle_swap(bvh_nodes[0], shufflexyz[0]) - Psplat[0]) * idirsplat[0];
const ssef tminmaxy = (shuffle_swap(bvh_nodes[1], shufflexyz[1]) - Psplat[1]) * idirsplat[1];
const ssef tminmaxz = (shuffle_swap(bvh_nodes[2], shufflexyz[2]) - Psplat[2]) * idirsplat[2];
/* calculate { c0min, c1min, -c0max, -c1max} */
ssef minmax = max(max(tminmaxx, tminmaxy), max(tminmaxz, tsplat));
const ssef tminmax = minmax ^ pn;
#if FEATURE(BVH_HAIR_MINIMUM_WIDTH)
if(difl != 0.0f) {
float4 *tminmaxview = (float4*)&tminmax;
float &c0min = tminmaxview->x, &c1min = tminmaxview->y;
float &c0max = tminmaxview->z, &c1max = tminmaxview->w;
float hdiff = 1.0f + difl;
float ldiff = 1.0f - difl;
if(__float_as_int(cnodes.z) & PATH_RAY_CURVE) {
c0min = max(ldiff * c0min, c0min - extmax);
c0max = min(hdiff * c0max, c0max + extmax);
}
if(__float_as_int(cnodes.w) & PATH_RAY_CURVE) {
c1min = max(ldiff * c1min, c1min - extmax);
c1max = min(hdiff * c1max, c1max + extmax);
}
}
#endif
const sseb lrhit = tminmax <= shuffle<2, 3, 0, 1>(tminmax);
/* decide which nodes to traverse next */
#ifdef __VISIBILITY_FLAG__
/* this visibility test gives a 5% performance hit, how to solve? */
traverseChild0 = (movemask(lrhit) & 1) && (__float_as_uint(cnodes.z) & visibility);
traverseChild1 = (movemask(lrhit) & 2) && (__float_as_uint(cnodes.w) & visibility);
#else
traverseChild0 = (movemask(lrhit) & 1);
traverseChild1 = (movemask(lrhit) & 2);
#endif
#endif // __KERNEL_SSE2__
nodeAddr = __float_as_int(cnodes.x);
nodeAddrChild1 = __float_as_int(cnodes.y);
if(traverseChild0 && traverseChild1) {
/* both children were intersected, push the farther one */
#if !defined(__KERNEL_SSE2__)
bool closestChild1 = (c1min < c0min);
#else
bool closestChild1 = tminmax[1] < tminmax[0];
#endif
if(closestChild1) {
int tmp = nodeAddr;
nodeAddr = nodeAddrChild1;
nodeAddrChild1 = tmp;
}
++stackPtr;
traversalStack[stackPtr] = nodeAddrChild1;
}
else {
/* one child was intersected */
if(traverseChild1) {
nodeAddr = nodeAddrChild1;
}
else if(!traverseChild0) {
/* neither child was intersected */
nodeAddr = traversalStack[stackPtr];
--stackPtr;
}
}
}
/* if node is leaf, fetch triangle list */
if(nodeAddr < 0) {
float4 leaf = kernel_tex_fetch(__bvh_nodes, (-nodeAddr-1)*BVH_NODE_SIZE+(BVH_NODE_SIZE-1));
int primAddr = __float_as_int(leaf.x);
#if FEATURE(BVH_INSTANCING)
if(primAddr >= 0) {
#endif
int primAddr2 = __float_as_int(leaf.y);
/* pop */
nodeAddr = traversalStack[stackPtr];
--stackPtr;
/* primitive intersection */
while(primAddr < primAddr2) {
bool hit;
uint type = kernel_tex_fetch(__prim_type, primAddr);
switch(type & PRIMITIVE_ALL) {
case PRIMITIVE_TRIANGLE: {
hit = triangle_intersect(kg, isect, P, dir, visibility, object, primAddr);
break;
}
#if FEATURE(BVH_MOTION)
case PRIMITIVE_MOTION_TRIANGLE: {
hit = motion_triangle_intersect(kg, isect, P, dir, ray->time, visibility, object, primAddr);
break;
}
#endif
#if FEATURE(BVH_HAIR)
case PRIMITIVE_CURVE:
case PRIMITIVE_MOTION_CURVE: {
if(kernel_data.curve.curveflags & CURVE_KN_INTERPOLATE)
hit = bvh_cardinal_curve_intersect(kg, isect, P, dir, visibility, object, primAddr, ray->time, type, lcg_state, difl, extmax);
else
hit = bvh_curve_intersect(kg, isect, P, dir, visibility, object, primAddr, ray->time, type, lcg_state, difl, extmax);
break;
}
#endif
default: {
hit = false;
break;
}
}
/* shadow ray early termination */
#if defined(__KERNEL_SSE2__)
if(hit) {
if(visibility == PATH_RAY_SHADOW_OPAQUE)
return true;
tsplat = ssef(0.0f, 0.0f, -isect->t, -isect->t);
}
#else
if(hit && visibility == PATH_RAY_SHADOW_OPAQUE)
return true;
#endif
primAddr++;
}
}
#if FEATURE(BVH_INSTANCING)
else {
/* instance push */
object = kernel_tex_fetch(__prim_object, -primAddr-1);
#if FEATURE(BVH_MOTION)
Cycles: shadow function optimization for transparent shadows (CPU only). Old algorithm: Raytrace from one transparent surface to the next step by step. To minimize overhead in cases where we don't need transparent shadows, we first trace a regular shadow ray. We check if the hit primitive was potentially transparent, and only in that case start marching. this gives extra ray cast for the cases were we do want transparency. New algorithm: We trace a single ray. If it hits any opaque surface, or more than a given number of transparent surfaces is hit, then we consider the geometry to be entirely blocked. If not, all transparent surfaces will be recorded and we will shade them one by one to determine how much light is blocked. This all happens in one scene intersection function. Recording all hits works well in some cases but may be slower in others. If we have many semi-transparent hairs, one intersection may be faster because you'd be reinteresecting the same hairs a lot with each step otherwise. If however there is mostly binary transparency then we may be recording many unnecessary intersections when one of the first surfaces blocks all light. We found that this helps quite nicely in some scenes, on koro.blend this can give a 50% reduction in render time, on the pabellon barcelona scene and a forest scene with transparent leaves it was 30%. Some other files rendered maybe 1% or 2% slower, but this seems a reasonable tradeoff. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D473
2014-04-19 15:02:30 +00:00
bvh_instance_motion_push(kg, object, ray, &P, &dir, &idir, &isect->t, &ob_tfm);
#else
Cycles: shadow function optimization for transparent shadows (CPU only). Old algorithm: Raytrace from one transparent surface to the next step by step. To minimize overhead in cases where we don't need transparent shadows, we first trace a regular shadow ray. We check if the hit primitive was potentially transparent, and only in that case start marching. this gives extra ray cast for the cases were we do want transparency. New algorithm: We trace a single ray. If it hits any opaque surface, or more than a given number of transparent surfaces is hit, then we consider the geometry to be entirely blocked. If not, all transparent surfaces will be recorded and we will shade them one by one to determine how much light is blocked. This all happens in one scene intersection function. Recording all hits works well in some cases but may be slower in others. If we have many semi-transparent hairs, one intersection may be faster because you'd be reinteresecting the same hairs a lot with each step otherwise. If however there is mostly binary transparency then we may be recording many unnecessary intersections when one of the first surfaces blocks all light. We found that this helps quite nicely in some scenes, on koro.blend this can give a 50% reduction in render time, on the pabellon barcelona scene and a forest scene with transparent leaves it was 30%. Some other files rendered maybe 1% or 2% slower, but this seems a reasonable tradeoff. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D473
2014-04-19 15:02:30 +00:00
bvh_instance_push(kg, object, ray, &P, &dir, &idir, &isect->t);
#endif
#if defined(__KERNEL_SSE2__)
Psplat[0] = ssef(P.x);
Psplat[1] = ssef(P.y);
Psplat[2] = ssef(P.z);
tsplat = ssef(0.0f, 0.0f, -isect->t, -isect->t);
gen_idirsplat_swap(pn, shuf_identity, shuf_swap, idir, idirsplat, shufflexyz);
#endif
++stackPtr;
traversalStack[stackPtr] = ENTRYPOINT_SENTINEL;
nodeAddr = kernel_tex_fetch(__object_node, object);
}
}
#endif
} while(nodeAddr != ENTRYPOINT_SENTINEL);
#if FEATURE(BVH_INSTANCING)
if(stackPtr >= 0) {
kernel_assert(object != OBJECT_NONE);
/* instance pop */
#if FEATURE(BVH_MOTION)
Cycles: shadow function optimization for transparent shadows (CPU only). Old algorithm: Raytrace from one transparent surface to the next step by step. To minimize overhead in cases where we don't need transparent shadows, we first trace a regular shadow ray. We check if the hit primitive was potentially transparent, and only in that case start marching. this gives extra ray cast for the cases were we do want transparency. New algorithm: We trace a single ray. If it hits any opaque surface, or more than a given number of transparent surfaces is hit, then we consider the geometry to be entirely blocked. If not, all transparent surfaces will be recorded and we will shade them one by one to determine how much light is blocked. This all happens in one scene intersection function. Recording all hits works well in some cases but may be slower in others. If we have many semi-transparent hairs, one intersection may be faster because you'd be reinteresecting the same hairs a lot with each step otherwise. If however there is mostly binary transparency then we may be recording many unnecessary intersections when one of the first surfaces blocks all light. We found that this helps quite nicely in some scenes, on koro.blend this can give a 50% reduction in render time, on the pabellon barcelona scene and a forest scene with transparent leaves it was 30%. Some other files rendered maybe 1% or 2% slower, but this seems a reasonable tradeoff. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D473
2014-04-19 15:02:30 +00:00
bvh_instance_motion_pop(kg, object, ray, &P, &dir, &idir, &isect->t, &ob_tfm);
#else
Cycles: shadow function optimization for transparent shadows (CPU only). Old algorithm: Raytrace from one transparent surface to the next step by step. To minimize overhead in cases where we don't need transparent shadows, we first trace a regular shadow ray. We check if the hit primitive was potentially transparent, and only in that case start marching. this gives extra ray cast for the cases were we do want transparency. New algorithm: We trace a single ray. If it hits any opaque surface, or more than a given number of transparent surfaces is hit, then we consider the geometry to be entirely blocked. If not, all transparent surfaces will be recorded and we will shade them one by one to determine how much light is blocked. This all happens in one scene intersection function. Recording all hits works well in some cases but may be slower in others. If we have many semi-transparent hairs, one intersection may be faster because you'd be reinteresecting the same hairs a lot with each step otherwise. If however there is mostly binary transparency then we may be recording many unnecessary intersections when one of the first surfaces blocks all light. We found that this helps quite nicely in some scenes, on koro.blend this can give a 50% reduction in render time, on the pabellon barcelona scene and a forest scene with transparent leaves it was 30%. Some other files rendered maybe 1% or 2% slower, but this seems a reasonable tradeoff. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D473
2014-04-19 15:02:30 +00:00
bvh_instance_pop(kg, object, ray, &P, &dir, &idir, &isect->t);
#endif
#if defined(__KERNEL_SSE2__)
Psplat[0] = ssef(P.x);
Psplat[1] = ssef(P.y);
Psplat[2] = ssef(P.z);
tsplat = ssef(0.0f, 0.0f, -isect->t, -isect->t);
gen_idirsplat_swap(pn, shuf_identity, shuf_swap, idir, idirsplat, shufflexyz);
#endif
object = OBJECT_NONE;
nodeAddr = traversalStack[stackPtr];
--stackPtr;
}
#endif
} while(nodeAddr != ENTRYPOINT_SENTINEL);
return (isect->prim != PRIM_NONE);
}
#undef FEATURE
#undef BVH_FUNCTION_NAME
#undef BVH_FUNCTION_FEATURES