Blender's operators are tools for users to access, that python can access them too is very useful nevertheless operators have limitations that can make them cumbersome to script.
When calling an operator gives an error like this:
>>> bpy.ops.action.clean(threshold=0.001)
RuntimeError: Operator bpy.ops.action.clean.poll() failed, context is incorrect
Which raises the question as to what the correct context might be?
Typically operators check for the active area type, a selection or active object they can operate on, but some operators are more picky about when they run.
Unfortunately if you're still stuck - the only way to **really** know whats going on is to read the source code for the poll function and see what its checking.
For python operators it's not so hard to find the source since it's included with Blender and the source file/line is included in the operator reference docs.
Downloading and searching the C code isn't so simple, especially if you're not familiar with the C language but by searching the operator name or description you should be able to find the poll function with no knowledge of C.
..note::
Blender does have the functionality for poll functions to describe why they fail, but its currently not used much, if you're interested to help improve our API feel free to add calls to ``CTX_wm_operator_poll_msg_set`` where its not obvious why poll fails.
>>> bpy.ops.gpencil.draw()
RuntimeError: Operator bpy.ops.gpencil.draw.poll() Failed to find Grease Pencil data to draw into
Certain operators in Blender are only intended for use in a specific context, some operators for example are only called from the properties window where they check the current material, modifier or constraint.
Examples of this are:
*:mod:`bpy.ops.texture.slot_move`
*:mod:`bpy.ops.constraint.limitdistance_reset`
*:mod:`bpy.ops.object.modifier_copy`
*:mod:`bpy.ops.buttons.file_browse`
Another possibility is that you are the first person to attempt to use this operator in a script and some modifications need to be made to the operator to run in a different context, if the operator should logically be able to run but fails when accessed from a script it should be reported to the bug tracker.
Once changing the objects :class:`bpy.types.Object.location` you may want to access its transformation right after from :class:`bpy.types.Object.matrix_world`, but this doesn't work as you might expect.
The official answer to this is no, or... *"You don't want to do that"*.
To give some background on the topic...
While a script executes Blender waits for it to finish and is effectively locked until its done, while in this state Blender won't redraw or respond to user input.
Normally this is not such a problem because scripts distributed with Blender tend not to run for an extended period of time, nevertheless scripts *can* take ages to execute and its nice to see whats going on in the view port.
Tools that lock Blender in a loop and redraw are highly discouraged since they conflict with Blenders ability to run multiple operators at once and update different parts of the interface as the tool runs.
So the solution here is to write a **modal** operator, that is - an operator which defines a modal() function, See the modal operator template in the text editor.
Modal operators execute on user input or setup their own timers to run frequently, they can handle the events or pass through to be handled by the keymap or other modal operators.
Transform, Painting, Fly-Mode and File-Select are example of a modal operators.
Writing modal operators takes more effort than a simple ``for`` loop that happens to redraw but is more flexible and integrates better with Blenders design.
If you insist - yes its possible, but scripts that use this hack wont be considered for inclusion in Blender and any issues with using it wont be considered bugs, this is also not guaranteed to work in future releases.
Every so often users complain that Blenders matrix math is wrong, the confusion comes from mathutils matrices being column-major to match OpenGL and the rest of Blenders matrix operations and stored matrix data.
This is different to **numpy** which is row-major which matches what you would expect when using conventional matrix math notation.
Blender's EditMesh is an internal data structure (not saved and not exposed to python), this gives the main annoyance that you need to exit edit-mode to edit the mesh from python.
Armature Bones in Blender have three distinct data structures that contain them. If you are accessing the bones through one of them, you may not have access to the properties you really need.
``bpy.context.object.data.edit_bones`` contains a editbones; to access them you must set the armature mode to edit mode first (editbones do not exist in object or pose mode). Use these to create new bones, set their head/tail or roll, change their parenting relationships to other bones, etc.
Example using :class:`bpy.types.EditBone` in armature editmode:
``bpy.context.object.data.bones`` contains bones. These *live* in object mode, and have various properties you can change, note that the head and tail properties are read-only.
Example using :class:`bpy.types.Bone` in object or pose mode:
``bpy.context.object.pose.bones`` contains pose bones. This is where animation data resides, i.e. animatable transformations are applied to pose bones, as are constraints and ik-settings.
Examples using :class:`bpy.types.PoseBone` in object or pose mode:
Notice the pose is accessed from the object rather than the object data, this is why blender can have 2 or more objects sharing the same armature in different poses.
Strictly speaking PoseBone's are not bones, they are just the state of the armature, stored in the :class:`bpy.types.Object` rather than the :class:`bpy.types.Armature`, the real bones are however accessible from the pose bones - :class:`bpy.types.PoseBone.bone`
While writing scripts that deal with armatures you may find you have to switch between modes, when doing so take care when switching out of editmode not to keep references to the edit-bones or their head/tail vectors. Further access to these will crash blender so its important the script clearly separates sections of the code which operate in different modes.
This is mainly an issue with editmode since pose data can be manipulated without having to be in pose mode, however for operator access you may still need to enter pose mode.
Data names may not match the assigned values if they exceed the maximum length, are already used or an empty string.
Its better practice not to reference objects by names at all, once created you can store the data in a list, dictionary, on a class etc, there is rarely a reason to have to keep searching for the same data by name.
If you do need to use name references, its best to use a dictionary to maintain a mapping between the names of the imported assets and the newly created data, this way you don't run this risk of referencing existing data from the blend file, or worse modifying it.
Blender keeps data names unique - :class:`bpy.types.ID.name` so you can't name two objects, meshes, scenes etc the same thing by accident.
However when linking in library data from another blend file naming collisions can occur, so its best to avoid referencing data by name at all.
This can be tricky at times and not even blender handles this correctly in some case (when selecting the modifier object for eg you can't select between multiple objects with the same name), but its still good to try avoid problems in this area.
If you need to select between local and library data, there is a feature in ``bpy.data`` members to allow for this.
..code-block:: python
# typical name lookup, could be local or library.
obj = bpy.data.objects["my_obj"]
# library object name look up using a pair
# where the second argument is the library path matching bpy.types.Library.filepath
When using blender data from linked libraries there is an unfortunate complication since the path will be relative to the library rather then the open blend file. When the data block may be from an external blend file pass the library argument from the :class:`bpy.types.ID`.
Unicode encoding/decoding is a big topic with comprehensive python documentation, to avoid getting stuck too deep in encoding problems - here are some suggestions:
* Always use utf-8 encoiding or convert to utf-8 where the input is unknown.
* Avoid manipulating filepaths as strings directly, use ``os.path`` functions instead.
* Use ``os.fsencode()`` / ``os.fsdecode()`` rather then the built in string decoding functions when operating on paths.
* To print paths or to include them in the user interface use ``repr(path)`` first or ``"%r" % path`` with string formatting.
***Possibly** - use bytes instead of python strings, when reading some input its less trouble to read it as binary data though you will still need to decide how to treat any strings you want to use with Blender, some importers do this.
Use cases like the one above which leave the thread running once the script finishes may seem to work for a while but end up causing random crashes or errors in Blender's own drawing code.
Pythons threads only allow co-currency and won't speed up your scripts on multi-processor systems, the ``subprocess`` and ``multiprocess`` modules can be used with blender and make use of multiple CPU's too.
Ideally it would be impossible to crash Blender from python however there are some problems with the API where it can be made to crash.
Strictly speaking this is a bug in the API but fixing it would mean adding memory verification on every access since most crashes are caused by the python objects referencing Blenders memory directly, whenever the memory is freed, further python access to it can crash the script. But fixing this would make the scripts run very slow, or writing a very different kind of API which doesn't reference the memory directly.
Here are some general hints to avoid running into these problems.
* Be aware of memory limits, especially when working with large lists since Blender can crash simply by running out of memory.
* Many hard to fix crashes end up being because of referencing freed data, when removing data be sure not to hold any references to it.
* Modules or classes that remain active while Blender is used, should not hold references to data the user may remove, instead, fetch data from the context each time the script is activated.
* Crashes may not happen every time, they may happen more on some configurations/operating-systems.
Undo invalidates all :class:`bpy.types.ID` instances (Object, Scene, Mesh etc).
This example shows how you can tell undo changes the memory locations.
>>> hash(bpy.context.object)
-9223372036849950810
>>> hash(bpy.context.object)
-9223372036849950810
# ... move the active object, then undo
>>> hash(bpy.context.object)
-9223372036849951740
As suggested above, simply not holding references to data when Blender is used interactively by the user is the only way to ensure the script doesn't become unstable.
Switching edit-mode ``bpy.ops.object.mode_set(mode='EDIT')`` / ``bpy.ops.object.mode_set(mode='OBJECT')`` will re-allocate objects data, any references to a meshes vertices/faces/uvs, armatures bones, curves points etc cannot be accessed after switching edit-mode.
Only the reference to the data its self can be re-accessed, the following example will crash.
..code-block:: python
mesh = bpy.context.active_object.data
faces = mesh.faces
bpy.ops.object.mode_set(mode='EDIT')
bpy.ops.object.mode_set(mode='OBJECT')
# this will crash
print(faces)
So after switching edit-mode you need to re-access any object data variables, the following example shows how to avoid the crash above.
..code-block:: python
mesh = bpy.context.active_object.data
faces = mesh.faces
bpy.ops.object.mode_set(mode='EDIT')
bpy.ops.object.mode_set(mode='OBJECT')
# faces have been re-allocated
faces = mesh.faces
print(faces)
These kinds of problems can happen for any functions which re-allocate the object data but are most common when switching edit-mode.
This can be avoided by re-assigning the point variables after adding the new one or by storing indices's to the points rather then the points themselves.
The best way is to sidestep the problem altogether add all the points to the curve at once. This means you don't have to worry about array re-allocation and its faster too since reallocating the entire array for every point added is inefficient.
**Any** data that you remove shouldn't be modified or accessed afterwards, this includes f-curves, drivers, render layers, timeline markers, modifiers, constraints along with objects, scenes, groups, bones.. etc.
This is a problem in the API at the moment that we should eventually solve.
Some python modules will call sys.exit() themselves when an error occurs, while not common behavior this is something to watch out for because it may seem as if blender is crashing since sys.exit() will quit blender immediately.
For example, the ``optparse`` module will print an error and exit if the arguments are invalid.
An ugly way of troubleshooting this is to set ``sys.exit = None`` and see what line of python code is quitting, you could of course replace ``sys.exit``/ with your own function but manipulating python in this way is bad practice.