The idea is to make include statements more explicit and obvious where the
file is coming from, additionally reducing chance of wrong header being
picked up.
For example, it was not obvious whether bvh.h was refferring to builder
or traversal, whenter node.h is a generic graph node or a shader node
and cases like that.
Surely this might look obvious for the active developers, but after some
time of not touching the code it becomes less obvious where file is coming
from.
This was briefly mentioned in T50824 and seems @brecht is fine with such
explicitness, but need to agree with all active developers before committing
this.
Please note that this patch is lacking changes related on GPU/OpenCL
support. This will be solved if/when we all agree this is a good idea to move
forward.
Reviewers: brecht, lukasstockner97, maiself, nirved, dingto, juicyfruit, swerner
Reviewed By: lukasstockner97, maiself, nirved, dingto
Subscribers: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2586
This is also an important mathematical operation that can be folded
if it is known that one argument is a certain constant. For colors
the operation is provided as a Gamma node.
The SVM Gamma node needs a small fix to make it follow the 0 ^ 0 == 1
rule, same as the Power node, or the Gamma node itself in OSL mode.
Reviewers: #cycles
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2263
These values often either turn the node into a no-op, or even make it
evaluate to 0 no matter what the other input value is, thus allowing
deletion of a branch of the node graph that otherwise is not constant.
Reviewed By: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2085
These are complex nodes, and it's conceivable they may end up constant
in some circumstances within node groups, so folding support is useful.
Reviewed By: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2084
