The idea is to make it simpler to remove noise from scenes when some prop uses
Sharp glossy closure and causes noise in certain cases. Previously Sharp Glossy
was not affected by Filter Glossy at all, which was quite confusing.
Here is a file which demonstrates the issue: {F417797}
After applying the patch all the noise from the scene is gone.
This change also solves fireflies reported in T50700.
Reviewers: brecht, lukasstockner97
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2416
New logic of split_faces was leaving mesh in a proper state
from Blender's point of view, but Cycles wanted loop normals
to be "flushed" to vertex normals.
Now we do such a flush from Cycles side again, so we don't
leave bad meshes behind.
Thanks Bastien for assistance here!
The issue seems to be caused by vertex normal being re-calculated
to something else than loop normal, which also caused wrong loop
normals after re-calculation.
For now issue is solved by preserving CD_NORMAL for loops after
split_faces() is finished, so render engine can access original
proper value.
Doesn't currently change anything, but would need for some future
work here.
It uses existing padding in kernel BVH structure, so there is
nothing changed memory-wise.
The issue here was mainly coming from minimal pixel width feature
which is quite commonly enabled in production shots.
This feature will use some probabilistic heuristic in the curve
intersection function to check whether we need to return intersection
or not. This probability is calculated for every intersection check.
Now, when we use multiple BVH nodes for curve primitives we increase
probability of that primitive to be considered a good intersection
for us. This is similar to increasing minimal width of curve.
What is worst here is that change in the intersection probability
fully depends on exact layout of BVH, meaning probability might
change differently depending on a view angle, the way how builder
binned the primitives and such. This makes it impossible to do
simple check like dividing probability by number of BVH steps.
Other solution might have been to split BVH into fully independent
trees, but that will increase memory usage of all the static
objects in the scenes, which is also not something desirable.
For now used most simple but robust approach: store BVH primitives
time and test it in curve intersection functions. This solves the
regression, but has two downsides:
- Uses more memory.
which isn't surprising, and ANY solution to this problem will
use more memory.
What we still have to do is to avoid this memory increase for
cases when we don't use BVH motion steps.
- Reduces number of maximum available textures on pre-kepler cards.
There is not much we can do here, hardware gets old but we need
to move forward on more modern hardware..
Quite simple fix for now which only deals with this case. Maybe we want to do
some "clipping" on image load time so regular textures wouldn't give NaN as
well.
This allows us to use faster math and still have reliable
isnan/isfinite tests.
Only do it for host side, kernels stays unchanged.
Thanks Lukas Stockner for the tip!
Seems CUDA failed to de-duplicate the array across multiple inlined
versions of the shadow_blocked(). Helped it a bit with that now.
Gives about 100MB memory improvement on a scenes after previous
commit and brings up memory "regression" to only 100MB comparing to
the master branch now.
