Failure when using image digest #398
Closed
opened 2023-01-30 08:44:30 +00:00 by justusbunsi
·
3 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
No results found.
v10.6.0
v10.5.0
v10.4.1
v10.4.0
v10.3.0
v10.2.0
v10.1.4
v10.1.3
v10.1.2
v10.1.1
v10.1.0
v10.0.2
v10.0.1
v10.0.0
v9.6.1
v9.6.0
v9.5.1
v9.5.0
v9.4.0
v9.3.0
v9.2.1
v9.2.0
v9.1.0
v9.0.4
v9.0.3
v9.0.2
v9.0.1
v9.0.0
v8.3.0
v8.2.0
v8.1.0
v8.0.3
v8.0.2
v8.0.1
v8.0.0
v7.0.4
v7.0.3
v7.0.2
v7.0.1
v7.0.0
v6.0.5
v6.0.4
v6.0.3
v6.0.2
v6.0.1
v6.0.0
v5.0.9
v5.0.8
v5.0.7
v5.0.6
v5.0.5
v5.0.4
v5.0.3
v5.0.2
v5.0.1
v5.0.0
v4.1.1
v4.1.0
v4.0.3
v4.0.2
v4.0.1
v4.0.0
v3.1.4
v3.1.3
v3.1.2
v3.1.1
v3.1.0
v3.0.0
v2.2.5
v2.2.4
v2.2.3
v2.2.2
v2.2.1
v2.2.0
v2.1.11
v2.1.10
v2.1.9
v2.1.8
v2.1.7
v2.1.6
v2.1.5
v2.1.4
v2.1.3
v2.1.2
v2.1.1
v2.1.0
v2.0.7
v2.0.6
v2.0.5
v2.0.4
v2.0.3
v2.0.2
v2.0.0
v1.5.5
v1.5.4
v1.5.3
v1.5.2
v1.5.1
v1.5.0
v1.4.9
v1.4.8
v1.4.7
v1.4.6
v1.4.5
v1.4.4
v1.4.3
v1.4.2
Labels
Clear labels
has/backport
in progress
invalid
kind/breaking
kind/bug
kind/build
kind/dependency
kind/deployment
kind/docs
kind/enhancement
kind/feature
kind/lint
kind/proposal
kind/question
kind/refactor
kind/security
kind/testing
kind/translation
kind/ui
need/backport
priority/critical
priority/low
priority/maybe
priority/medium
reviewed/duplicate
reviewed/invalid
reviewed/wontfix
skip-changelog
status/blocked
status/needs-feedback
status/needs-reviews
status/wip
upstream/gitea
upstream/other
No Label
kind/bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: lunny/helm-chart#398
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Having a customized values.yaml like
will result in templated resources with labels for
version
andapp.kubernetes.io/version
being too long for Kubernetes (more than 63 characters). Thetag
value is directly used within a helper template function and affects all resources this Chart generates.Currently, it seems impossible to use a specific image digest with the Chart.
I propose either a new
image.digest
orimage.fullOverride
option to prevent overfloating label lengths, or trimming the value to a maximum of 63 characters.If that does it, I'd vote for that.
Out of curiosity: is that a common thing you do in your environments? I've never seen the digest being used in the tag field. The only reason that comes to my mind is when you overwrite a tag during development, push a new image and want to use an older image with the same respective tag that has no active tag anymore in the registry.
I usually pin the image to a specific digest, especially when images are mutable. To me it's a matter of reproducability of my environment. But in this particular case I wanted to check something that was published with this specific digest.
Having the setting trimmed would probably lead to a weird label value. I personally would prefer providing a dedicated digest field (empty by default). Doing so would allow to specify the digest itself as a separate label on the resources. As long as it's less than 63 chars without the tag value. xD
We also could use regex to remove the digest from that value when using it as label.
bitnami's common.images.image macro is pretty neat for this with the optional digest (example )