Update README with new dependency versioning approach #578
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "refs/pull/578/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
As discussed in https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/issues/572.
Also added a bit more context and updates to the overall "Dependencies" sections.
@justusbunsi Any comments from your side?
Sorry for not reviewing earlier. Last week was weird wrt my availability.
Don't repeat "dependencies".
This should be more eye-catching. Maybe by using the quote syntax? Although, this would break the text flow. 🤔
I've used a
**Note**
to make it stand out more.I wouldn't be specific about when to update. Every few years seems a bit long. 😉
We probably shouldn't refer to a OS-specific image. Otherwise, we should update the reference now and then. Maybe simply referring to
:<majorVersion>
?This is the image the Bitnami chart uses. I would prefer to link users to it to avoid them using the official PG image - for compatibility with the bitnami chart. There are reasons why Bitnami maintains their own PG images.
We could variabalize the
11
but I wouldn't want to be too generic here with the image recommendation.Absolutely. We should prevent any confusion. We could directly link to the DockerHub tag list site of the respective pgsql image. There is also the
:<majorVersion>
tag available.@ -121,7 +116,6 @@ Please double-check the image repository and available tags in the sub-chart:
- [PostgreSQL-HA](https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnami/postgresql-repmgr/tags)
- [PostgreSQL](https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnami/postgresql/tags)
Intentional to use the permalink for redis-cluster but the main branch for pgsql-ha?
If not, this is the permalink for pgsql-ha:
https://github.com/bitnami/charts/blob/b51288a469c1e42dac2ee2b3f26f1951eebf741f/bitnami/postgresql-ha/values.yaml#L106-L107
Good catch. Not intentional. I think the the dynamic link is better here. Yes, line numbers might change but linking to an old version might also confuse users.
LGTM 👍