blender/source/gameengine/Rasterizer/RAS_IPolygonMaterial.cpp

261 lines
5.6 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/*
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
* $Id$
* ***** BEGIN GPL LICENSE BLOCK *****
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
* of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
2010-02-12 13:34:04 +00:00
* Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
*
* The Original Code is Copyright (C) 2001-2002 by NaN Holding BV.
* All rights reserved.
*
* The Original Code is: all of this file.
*
* Contributor(s): none yet.
*
* ***** END GPL LICENSE BLOCK *****
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
*/
2011-02-25 13:38:24 +00:00
/** \file gameengine/Rasterizer/RAS_IPolygonMaterial.cpp
* \ingroup bgerast
*/
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
#include "RAS_IPolygonMaterial.h"
#include "RAS_IRasterizer.h"
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
BGE: Support mesh modifiers in the game engine. Realtime modifiers applied on mesh objects will be supported in the game engine with the following limitations: - Only real time modifiers are supported (basically all of them!) - Virtual modifiers resulting from parenting are not supported: armature, curve, lattice. You can still use these modifiers (armature is really not recommended) but in non parent mode. The BGE has it's own parenting capability for armature. - Modifiers are computed on the host (using blender modifier stack). - Modifiers are statically evaluated: any possible time dependency in the modifiers is not supported (don't know enough about modifiers to be more specific). - Modifiers are reevaluated if the underlying mesh is deformed due to shape action or armature action. Beware that this is very CPU intensive; modifiers should really be used for static objects only. - Physics is still based on the original mesh: if you have a mirror modifier, the physic shape will be limited to one half of the resulting object. Therefore, the modifiers should preferably be used on graphic objects. - Scripts have no access to the modified mesh. - Modifiers that are based on objects interaction (boolean,..) will not be dependent on the objects position in the GE. What you see in the 3D view is what you get in the GE regardless on the object position, velocity, etc. Besides that, the feature is compatible with all the BGE features that affect meshes: armature action, shape action, relace mesh, VideoTexture, add object, dupligroup. Known problems: - This feature is a bit hacky: the BGE uses the derived mesh draw functions to display the object. This drawing method is a bit slow and is not 100% compatible with the BGE. There may be some problems in multi-texture mode: the multi-texture coordinates are not sent to the GPU. Texface and GLSL on the other hand should be fully supported. - Culling is still based on the extend of the original mesh. If you have a modifer that extends the size of the mesh, the object may disappear while still in the view frustrum. - Derived mesh is not shared between replicas. The derived mesh is allocated and computed for each object with modifiers, regardless if they are static replicas. - Display list are not created on objects with modifiers. I should be able to fix the above problems before release. However, the feature is already useful for game development. Once you are ready to release the game, you can apply the modifiers to get back display list support and mesh sharing capability. MSVC, scons, Cmake, makefile updated. Enjoy /benoit
2009-04-21 11:01:09 +00:00
#include "DNA_image_types.h"
#include "DNA_meshdata_types.h"
void RAS_IPolyMaterial::Initialize(
const STR_String& texname,
const STR_String& matname,
int materialindex,
int tile,
int tilexrep,
int tileyrep,
int mode,
int transp,
bool alpha,
bool zsort)
{
m_texturename = texname;
m_materialname = matname;
m_materialindex = materialindex;
m_tile = tile;
m_tilexrep = tilexrep;
m_tileyrep = tileyrep;
m_drawingmode = mode;
m_transp = transp;
m_alpha = alpha;
m_zsort = zsort;
m_polymatid = m_newpolymatid++;
m_flag = 0;
m_multimode = 0;
m_shininess = 35.0;
m_specular.setValue(0.5,0.5,0.5);
m_specularity = 1.0;
m_diffuse.setValue(0.5,0.5,0.5);
}
RAS_IPolyMaterial::RAS_IPolyMaterial()
: m_texturename("__Dummy_Texture_Name__"),
m_materialname("__Dummy_Material_Name__"),
m_tile(0),
m_tilexrep(0),
m_tileyrep(0),
m_drawingmode (0),
m_transp(0),
m_alpha(false),
m_zsort(false),
m_materialindex(0),
m_polymatid(0),
m_flag(0),
m_multimode(0)
{
m_shininess = 35.0;
m_specular = MT_Vector3(0.5,0.5,0.5);
m_specularity = 1.0;
m_diffuse = MT_Vector3(0.5,0.5,0.5);
}
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
RAS_IPolyMaterial::RAS_IPolyMaterial(const STR_String& texname,
const STR_String& matname,
BGE: Support mesh modifiers in the game engine. Realtime modifiers applied on mesh objects will be supported in the game engine with the following limitations: - Only real time modifiers are supported (basically all of them!) - Virtual modifiers resulting from parenting are not supported: armature, curve, lattice. You can still use these modifiers (armature is really not recommended) but in non parent mode. The BGE has it's own parenting capability for armature. - Modifiers are computed on the host (using blender modifier stack). - Modifiers are statically evaluated: any possible time dependency in the modifiers is not supported (don't know enough about modifiers to be more specific). - Modifiers are reevaluated if the underlying mesh is deformed due to shape action or armature action. Beware that this is very CPU intensive; modifiers should really be used for static objects only. - Physics is still based on the original mesh: if you have a mirror modifier, the physic shape will be limited to one half of the resulting object. Therefore, the modifiers should preferably be used on graphic objects. - Scripts have no access to the modified mesh. - Modifiers that are based on objects interaction (boolean,..) will not be dependent on the objects position in the GE. What you see in the 3D view is what you get in the GE regardless on the object position, velocity, etc. Besides that, the feature is compatible with all the BGE features that affect meshes: armature action, shape action, relace mesh, VideoTexture, add object, dupligroup. Known problems: - This feature is a bit hacky: the BGE uses the derived mesh draw functions to display the object. This drawing method is a bit slow and is not 100% compatible with the BGE. There may be some problems in multi-texture mode: the multi-texture coordinates are not sent to the GPU. Texface and GLSL on the other hand should be fully supported. - Culling is still based on the extend of the original mesh. If you have a modifer that extends the size of the mesh, the object may disappear while still in the view frustrum. - Derived mesh is not shared between replicas. The derived mesh is allocated and computed for each object with modifiers, regardless if they are static replicas. - Display list are not created on objects with modifiers. I should be able to fix the above problems before release. However, the feature is already useful for game development. Once you are ready to release the game, you can apply the modifiers to get back display list support and mesh sharing capability. MSVC, scons, Cmake, makefile updated. Enjoy /benoit
2009-04-21 11:01:09 +00:00
int materialindex,
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
int tile,
int tilexrep,
int tileyrep,
int mode,
int transp,
bool alpha,
bool zsort)
: m_texturename(texname),
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
m_materialname(matname),
m_tile(tile),
m_tilexrep(tilexrep),
m_tileyrep(tileyrep),
m_drawingmode (mode),
m_transp(transp),
m_alpha(alpha),
m_zsort(zsort),
m_materialindex(materialindex),
m_polymatid(m_newpolymatid++),
m_flag(0),
m_multimode(0)
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
{
m_shininess = 35.0;
m_specular = MT_Vector3(0.5,0.5,0.5);
m_specularity = 1.0;
m_diffuse = MT_Vector3(0.5,0.5,0.5);
}
bool RAS_IPolyMaterial::Equals(const RAS_IPolyMaterial& lhs) const
{
if(m_flag &RAS_BLENDERMAT)
{
bool test = (
this->m_multimode == lhs.m_multimode &&
this->m_flag == lhs.m_flag &&
this->m_drawingmode == lhs.m_drawingmode &&
this->m_transp == lhs.m_transp &&
this->m_texturename.hash() == lhs.m_texturename.hash() &&
this->m_materialname.hash() == lhs.m_materialname.hash()
);
return test;
}
else
{
return (
this->m_tile == lhs.m_tile &&
this->m_tilexrep == lhs.m_tilexrep &&
this->m_tileyrep == lhs.m_tileyrep &&
this->m_transp == lhs.m_transp &&
this->m_alpha == lhs.m_alpha &&
this->m_zsort == lhs.m_zsort &&
this->m_drawingmode == lhs.m_drawingmode &&
this->m_texturename.hash() == lhs.m_texturename.hash() &&
this->m_materialname.hash() == lhs.m_materialname.hash()
);
}
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
}
BGE: Support mesh modifiers in the game engine. Realtime modifiers applied on mesh objects will be supported in the game engine with the following limitations: - Only real time modifiers are supported (basically all of them!) - Virtual modifiers resulting from parenting are not supported: armature, curve, lattice. You can still use these modifiers (armature is really not recommended) but in non parent mode. The BGE has it's own parenting capability for armature. - Modifiers are computed on the host (using blender modifier stack). - Modifiers are statically evaluated: any possible time dependency in the modifiers is not supported (don't know enough about modifiers to be more specific). - Modifiers are reevaluated if the underlying mesh is deformed due to shape action or armature action. Beware that this is very CPU intensive; modifiers should really be used for static objects only. - Physics is still based on the original mesh: if you have a mirror modifier, the physic shape will be limited to one half of the resulting object. Therefore, the modifiers should preferably be used on graphic objects. - Scripts have no access to the modified mesh. - Modifiers that are based on objects interaction (boolean,..) will not be dependent on the objects position in the GE. What you see in the 3D view is what you get in the GE regardless on the object position, velocity, etc. Besides that, the feature is compatible with all the BGE features that affect meshes: armature action, shape action, relace mesh, VideoTexture, add object, dupligroup. Known problems: - This feature is a bit hacky: the BGE uses the derived mesh draw functions to display the object. This drawing method is a bit slow and is not 100% compatible with the BGE. There may be some problems in multi-texture mode: the multi-texture coordinates are not sent to the GPU. Texface and GLSL on the other hand should be fully supported. - Culling is still based on the extend of the original mesh. If you have a modifer that extends the size of the mesh, the object may disappear while still in the view frustrum. - Derived mesh is not shared between replicas. The derived mesh is allocated and computed for each object with modifiers, regardless if they are static replicas. - Display list are not created on objects with modifiers. I should be able to fix the above problems before release. However, the feature is already useful for game development. Once you are ready to release the game, you can apply the modifiers to get back display list support and mesh sharing capability. MSVC, scons, Cmake, makefile updated. Enjoy /benoit
2009-04-21 11:01:09 +00:00
void RAS_IPolyMaterial::GetMaterialRGBAColor(unsigned char *rgba) const
{
*rgba++ = 0xFF;
*rgba++ = 0xFF;
*rgba++ = 0xFF;
*rgba++ = 0xFF;
}
bool RAS_IPolyMaterial::Less(const RAS_IPolyMaterial& rhs) const
{
if (Equals(rhs))
return false;
return m_polymatid < rhs.m_polymatid;
}
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
bool RAS_IPolyMaterial::IsAlpha() const
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
{
return m_alpha || m_zsort;
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
}
bool RAS_IPolyMaterial::IsZSort() const
{
return m_zsort;
}
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
unsigned int RAS_IPolyMaterial::hash() const
{
return m_texturename.hash();
}
int RAS_IPolyMaterial::GetDrawingMode() const
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
{
return m_drawingmode;
}
const STR_String& RAS_IPolyMaterial::GetMaterialName() const
{
return m_materialname;
}
dword RAS_IPolyMaterial::GetMaterialNameHash() const
{
return m_materialname.hash();
}
2002-10-12 11:37:38 +00:00
const STR_String& RAS_IPolyMaterial::GetTextureName() const
{
return m_texturename;
}
BGE: Support mesh modifiers in the game engine. Realtime modifiers applied on mesh objects will be supported in the game engine with the following limitations: - Only real time modifiers are supported (basically all of them!) - Virtual modifiers resulting from parenting are not supported: armature, curve, lattice. You can still use these modifiers (armature is really not recommended) but in non parent mode. The BGE has it's own parenting capability for armature. - Modifiers are computed on the host (using blender modifier stack). - Modifiers are statically evaluated: any possible time dependency in the modifiers is not supported (don't know enough about modifiers to be more specific). - Modifiers are reevaluated if the underlying mesh is deformed due to shape action or armature action. Beware that this is very CPU intensive; modifiers should really be used for static objects only. - Physics is still based on the original mesh: if you have a mirror modifier, the physic shape will be limited to one half of the resulting object. Therefore, the modifiers should preferably be used on graphic objects. - Scripts have no access to the modified mesh. - Modifiers that are based on objects interaction (boolean,..) will not be dependent on the objects position in the GE. What you see in the 3D view is what you get in the GE regardless on the object position, velocity, etc. Besides that, the feature is compatible with all the BGE features that affect meshes: armature action, shape action, relace mesh, VideoTexture, add object, dupligroup. Known problems: - This feature is a bit hacky: the BGE uses the derived mesh draw functions to display the object. This drawing method is a bit slow and is not 100% compatible with the BGE. There may be some problems in multi-texture mode: the multi-texture coordinates are not sent to the GPU. Texface and GLSL on the other hand should be fully supported. - Culling is still based on the extend of the original mesh. If you have a modifer that extends the size of the mesh, the object may disappear while still in the view frustrum. - Derived mesh is not shared between replicas. The derived mesh is allocated and computed for each object with modifiers, regardless if they are static replicas. - Display list are not created on objects with modifiers. I should be able to fix the above problems before release. However, the feature is already useful for game development. Once you are ready to release the game, you can apply the modifiers to get back display list support and mesh sharing capability. MSVC, scons, Cmake, makefile updated. Enjoy /benoit
2009-04-21 11:01:09 +00:00
int RAS_IPolyMaterial::GetMaterialIndex() const
{
return m_materialindex;
}
Material *RAS_IPolyMaterial::GetBlenderMaterial() const
{
return NULL;
}
Image *RAS_IPolyMaterial::GetBlenderImage() const
{
return NULL;
}
BGE: Support mesh modifiers in the game engine. Realtime modifiers applied on mesh objects will be supported in the game engine with the following limitations: - Only real time modifiers are supported (basically all of them!) - Virtual modifiers resulting from parenting are not supported: armature, curve, lattice. You can still use these modifiers (armature is really not recommended) but in non parent mode. The BGE has it's own parenting capability for armature. - Modifiers are computed on the host (using blender modifier stack). - Modifiers are statically evaluated: any possible time dependency in the modifiers is not supported (don't know enough about modifiers to be more specific). - Modifiers are reevaluated if the underlying mesh is deformed due to shape action or armature action. Beware that this is very CPU intensive; modifiers should really be used for static objects only. - Physics is still based on the original mesh: if you have a mirror modifier, the physic shape will be limited to one half of the resulting object. Therefore, the modifiers should preferably be used on graphic objects. - Scripts have no access to the modified mesh. - Modifiers that are based on objects interaction (boolean,..) will not be dependent on the objects position in the GE. What you see in the 3D view is what you get in the GE regardless on the object position, velocity, etc. Besides that, the feature is compatible with all the BGE features that affect meshes: armature action, shape action, relace mesh, VideoTexture, add object, dupligroup. Known problems: - This feature is a bit hacky: the BGE uses the derived mesh draw functions to display the object. This drawing method is a bit slow and is not 100% compatible with the BGE. There may be some problems in multi-texture mode: the multi-texture coordinates are not sent to the GPU. Texface and GLSL on the other hand should be fully supported. - Culling is still based on the extend of the original mesh. If you have a modifer that extends the size of the mesh, the object may disappear while still in the view frustrum. - Derived mesh is not shared between replicas. The derived mesh is allocated and computed for each object with modifiers, regardless if they are static replicas. - Display list are not created on objects with modifiers. I should be able to fix the above problems before release. However, the feature is already useful for game development. Once you are ready to release the game, you can apply the modifiers to get back display list support and mesh sharing capability. MSVC, scons, Cmake, makefile updated. Enjoy /benoit
2009-04-21 11:01:09 +00:00
Scene* RAS_IPolyMaterial::GetBlenderScene() const
{
return NULL;
}
BGE performance, 3rd round: culling and rasterizer. This commit extend the technique of dynamic linked list to the mesh slots so as to eliminate dumb scan or map lookup. It provides massive performance improvement in the culling and in the rasterizer when the majority of objects are static. Other improvements: - Compute the opengl matrix only for objects that are visible. - Simplify hash function for GEN_HasedPtr - Scan light list instead of general object list to render shadows - Remove redundant opengl calls to set specularity, shinyness and diffuse between each mesh slots. - Cache GPU material to avoid frequent call to GPU_material_from_blender - Only set once the fixed elements of mesh slot - Use more inline function The following table shows the performance increase between 2.48, 1st round and this round of improvement. The test was done with a scene containing 40000 objects, of which 1000 are in the view frustrum approximately. The object are simple textured cube to make sure the GPU is not the bottleneck. As some of the rasterizer processing time has moved under culling, I present the sum of scenegraph(includes culling)+rasterizer time Scenegraph+rasterizer(ms) 2.48 1st round 3rd round All objects static, 323.0 86.0 7.2 all visible, 1000 in the view frustrum All objects static, 219.0 49.7 N/A(*) all invisible. All objects moving, 323.0 105.6 34.7 all visible, 1000 in the view frustrum Scene destruction 40min 40min 4s (*) : this time is not representative because the frame rate was at 60fps. In that case, the GPU holds down the GE by frame sync. By design, the overhead of the rasterizer is 0 when the the objects are invisible. This table shows a global speed up between 9x and 45x compared to 2.48a for scenegraph, culling and rasterizer overhead. The speed up goes much higher when objects are invisible. An additional 2-4x speed up is possible in the scenegraph by upgrading the Moto library to use Eigen2 BLAS library instead of C++ classes but the scenegraph is already so fast that it is not a priority right now. Next speed up in logic: many things to do there...
2009-05-07 09:13:01 +00:00
void RAS_IPolyMaterial::ReleaseMaterial()
{
}
BGE: Support mesh modifiers in the game engine. Realtime modifiers applied on mesh objects will be supported in the game engine with the following limitations: - Only real time modifiers are supported (basically all of them!) - Virtual modifiers resulting from parenting are not supported: armature, curve, lattice. You can still use these modifiers (armature is really not recommended) but in non parent mode. The BGE has it's own parenting capability for armature. - Modifiers are computed on the host (using blender modifier stack). - Modifiers are statically evaluated: any possible time dependency in the modifiers is not supported (don't know enough about modifiers to be more specific). - Modifiers are reevaluated if the underlying mesh is deformed due to shape action or armature action. Beware that this is very CPU intensive; modifiers should really be used for static objects only. - Physics is still based on the original mesh: if you have a mirror modifier, the physic shape will be limited to one half of the resulting object. Therefore, the modifiers should preferably be used on graphic objects. - Scripts have no access to the modified mesh. - Modifiers that are based on objects interaction (boolean,..) will not be dependent on the objects position in the GE. What you see in the 3D view is what you get in the GE regardless on the object position, velocity, etc. Besides that, the feature is compatible with all the BGE features that affect meshes: armature action, shape action, relace mesh, VideoTexture, add object, dupligroup. Known problems: - This feature is a bit hacky: the BGE uses the derived mesh draw functions to display the object. This drawing method is a bit slow and is not 100% compatible with the BGE. There may be some problems in multi-texture mode: the multi-texture coordinates are not sent to the GPU. Texface and GLSL on the other hand should be fully supported. - Culling is still based on the extend of the original mesh. If you have a modifer that extends the size of the mesh, the object may disappear while still in the view frustrum. - Derived mesh is not shared between replicas. The derived mesh is allocated and computed for each object with modifiers, regardless if they are static replicas. - Display list are not created on objects with modifiers. I should be able to fix the above problems before release. However, the feature is already useful for game development. Once you are ready to release the game, you can apply the modifiers to get back display list support and mesh sharing capability. MSVC, scons, Cmake, makefile updated. Enjoy /benoit
2009-04-21 11:01:09 +00:00
unsigned int RAS_IPolyMaterial::GetFlag() const
{
return m_flag;
}
bool RAS_IPolyMaterial::UsesLighting(RAS_IRasterizer *rasty) const
{
bool dolights = false;
if(m_flag & RAS_BLENDERMAT)
dolights = (m_flag &RAS_MULTILIGHT)!=0;
else if(rasty->GetDrawingMode() < RAS_IRasterizer::KX_SOLID);
else if(rasty->GetDrawingMode() == RAS_IRasterizer::KX_SHADOW);
else
dolights = (m_drawingmode & RAS_IRasterizer::KX_LIGHT)!=0;
return dolights;
}
bool RAS_IPolyMaterial::CastsShadows() const
{
return (m_flag & RAS_CASTSHADOW) != 0;
}
bool RAS_IPolyMaterial::UsesObjectColor() const
{
return !(m_flag & RAS_BLENDERGLSL);
}
unsigned int RAS_IPolyMaterial::m_newpolymatid = 0;