Fix T48422: Revert "BLI_task: nano-optimizations to BLI_task_parallel_range feature."

There are some serious issues under windows, causing deadlocks somehow (not reproducible under linux so far).

Until further investigation over why this happens, better to revert to previous
spin-locked behavior.

This reverts commits a83bc4f59707ab and 98123ae9168.
This commit is contained in:
Bastien Montagne 2016-05-15 21:11:36 +02:00
parent 23bdcfe560
commit bb7da630ba

@ -776,29 +776,23 @@ typedef struct ParallelRangeState {
int iter;
int chunk_size;
SpinLock lock;
} ParallelRangeState;
BLI_INLINE bool parallel_range_next_iter_get(
ParallelRangeState * __restrict state,
int * __restrict iter, int * __restrict count)
{
uint32_t n, olditer, previter, newiter;
if (UNLIKELY(state->iter >= state->stop)) {
return false;
bool result = false;
BLI_spin_lock(&state->lock);
if (state->iter < state->stop) {
*count = min_ii(state->chunk_size, state->stop - state->iter);
*iter = state->iter;
state->iter += *count;
result = true;
}
do {
olditer = state->iter;
n = min_ii(state->chunk_size, state->stop - olditer);
newiter = olditer + n;
previter = atomic_cas_uint32((uint32_t *)&state->iter, olditer, newiter);
} while (UNLIKELY(previter != olditer));
*iter = previter;
*count = n;
return (n != 0);
BLI_spin_unlock(&state->lock);
return result;
}
static void parallel_range_func(
@ -903,6 +897,7 @@ static void task_parallel_range_ex(
*/
num_tasks = num_threads * 2;
BLI_spin_init(&state.lock);
state.start = start;
state.stop = stop;
state.userdata = userdata;
@ -921,15 +916,16 @@ static void task_parallel_range_ex(
num_tasks = min_ii(num_tasks, (stop - start) / state.chunk_size);
for (i = 0; i < num_tasks; i++) {
/* Use this pool's pre-allocated tasks. */
BLI_task_pool_push_from_thread(task_pool,
parallel_range_func,
NULL, false,
TASK_PRIORITY_HIGH, 0);
BLI_task_pool_push(task_pool,
parallel_range_func,
NULL, false,
TASK_PRIORITY_HIGH);
}
BLI_task_pool_work_and_wait(task_pool);
BLI_task_pool_free(task_pool);
BLI_spin_end(&state.lock);
}
/**