Issue was caused by the precision issues which made sdivm by 1 under
it's actual value. We can try to do some eps magic, but from the tests
on laptop and desktop doing integer division is not slower than using
floats here.
This to avoids build conflicts with libc++ on FreeBSD, these __ prefixed values
are reserved for compilers. I apologize to anyone who has patches or branches
and has to go through the pain of merging this change, it may be easiest to do
these same replacements in your code and then apply/merge the patch.
Ref T37477.
* Add CUDA compiler version detection to cmake/scons/runtime
* Remove noinline in kernel_shader.h and reenable --use_fast_math if CUDA 5.x
is used, these were workarounds for CUDA 4.2 bugs
* Change max number of registers to 32 for sm 2.x (based on performance tests
from Martijn Berger and confirmed here), and also for NVidia OpenCL.
Overall it seems that with these changes and the latest CUDA 5.0 download, that
performance is as good as or better than the 2.67b release with the scenes and
graphics cards I tested.
and sm_30 cards, so hopefully it should all work now.
Also includes some warnings fixes related to nvcc compiler arguments, should make
no difference otherwise.
instead of sobol. So far one doesn't seem to be consistently better or worse than
the other for the same number of samples but more testing is needed.
The random number generator itself is slower than sobol for most number of samples,
except 16, 64, 256, .. because they can be computed faster. This can probably be
optimized, but we can do that when/if this actually turns out to be useful.
Paper this implementation is based on:
http://graphics.pixar.com/library/MultiJitteredSampling/
Also includes some refactoring of RNG code, fixing a Sobol correlation issue with
the first BSDF and < 16 samples, skipping some unneeded RNG calls and using a
simpler unit square to unit disk function.
