5d0481342 Fix compile issues when using cuda 12
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !2960
(cherry picked from commit f8af0b17f4cc771ceb2cc2e2b40947be450099cc)
f545feba8 Add changelog for documenting data license
a24358a1a Document source of WarpX files
60559ce9b Document the source of venn250.vtk
796ec9638 Document data that comes from VisIt tutorial
06391c4e6 Clarify license for ECL data
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Vicente Bolea <vicente.bolea@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !3016
Some of the data sets that are included from VTK-m are derived from the
VisIt Tutorial Data (https://www.visitusers.org/index.php?title=Tutorial_Data).
These are covered by the VisIt license, as communicated by Eric Brugger.
Although the license for these data is compatible with VTK-m's license,
we should still attribute the source of the data and make clear the
copyrights. The data are moved into the third_party directory, and
readmes are added to document everything.
The noise.vtk and noise.bov files have been renamed example.vtk and
example_temp.bov to match the name of the file in the VisIt tutorial
data archive. The ucd3d.vtk file, which is similar to the curv3d.silo
data but altered, has been removed. It was not used for any tests. It
was referenced in a couple of example programs, but the reference is
easily changed.
The readme for the ECL data gave the source of the data but required a
lookup for the license. Explictly give the direct link to the license
and copy the license to the readme to ensure we are following the
conditions of attribution.
Some of the test data sets are derived from data sets that are commonly
distributed to test visualization algorithms and are featured in
numerous papers. However, I am unable to track down the original source
let alone identify what license, if any, they were released under. To
avoid any complications with data ownership, remove these data sets and
replace them with in house data sets that we explicitly own.
While updating the user's guide, I noticed a couple of minor problems
with how filters map fields. First, if a filter was using
`CreateResultCoordinateSystem`, it did not respect the
`PassCoordinateSystems` flag. Second, if both an `initializer_list` and
a mode was given to `SetFieldsToPass`, the mode was captured
incorrectly. Both problems are corrected.
CUDA 12 adds a `cub::Swap` function that creates ambiguity with `vtkm::Swap`.
This happens when a function from the `cub` namespace is called with an object
of a class defined in the `vtkm` namespace as an argument. If that function
has an unqualified call to `Swap`, it results in ADL being used, causing the
templated functions `cub::Swap` and `vtkm::Swap` to conflict.
The fields in a `DataSet` are indexed from `0` to `GetNumberOfFields() - 1`.
It is natural to assume that the fields will be indexed in the order that
they are added, but they are not. Rather, the indexing is arbitrary and can
change any time a field is added to the dataset.
To make this more clear, Doxygen documentation is added to the `DataSet`
methods to inform users to not make any assumptions about the order of
field indexing.
