It is very easy to cause ODR violations with DeviceAdapterTagCuda.
If you include that header from a C++ file and a CUDA file inside
the same program we an ODR violation. The reasons is that the C++
versions will say the tag is invalid, and the CUDA will say the
tag is valid.
The solution to this is that any compilation unit that includes
DeviceAdapterTagCuda from a version of VTK-m that has CUDA enabled
must be invoked by the cuda compiler.
This adds an ExecutionSignature tag named Device that passes the
DeviceAdapterTag as an argument to the worklet's operator(). This allows
worklets to specialize their code based on the device.
CUDA devices have problems with recursive algorithms that have no well-
defined depth because the stack on a CUDA device tends to be pretty
short. Fix the problem for BoundingIntervalHierarchyExec by changing to
a state-machine based algorithm that follows the hierarchy up and down.
Mask objects allow you to specify which output values should be
generated when a worklet is run. That is, the Mask allows you to skip
the invocation of a worklet for any number of outputs.
The ArrayPortalValueReference is supposed to behave just like the value
it encapsulates and does so by automatically converting to the base type
when necessary. However, when it is possible to convert that to
something else, it is possible to get errors about ambiguous overloads.
To avoid these, add specialized versions of the operators to specify
which ones should be used.
Also consolidated the CUDA version of an ArrayPortalValueReference to the
standard one. The two implementations were equivalent and we would like
changes to apply to both.
This is only set while compiling device code, and is useful
for code that needs different implementations on devices (e.g.
they call CUDA device intrinsics, etc).
`vtkm::cont::testing` now initializes with logging enabled and support
for device being passed on the command line, `vtkm::testing` only
enables logging.
The purpose of the TestBuild infrastructure was to confirm that
VTK-m didn't have any lexical issues when it was a pure header
only project. As we now move to have more compiled components
the need for this form of testing is mitigated. Combined
with the issue of TestBuilds causing MSVC issues, we should
just remove this infrastructure.
Adds a variable `GlobalPointIndexStart` to `CellSetStructured`.
Adding this to the cell-set, instead of the coordinate system, enables this
feature for different types of datasets like uniform grid, rectilinear, etc.,
with this one change.
The extents can be computed using `GlobalPointIndexStart` and `PointDimensions`.
Did a bit of renaming of the support classes used for
WorkletPointNeighborhood. First, the OnBoundary tag is changed to
Boundary to match other tags and reflect some changes in the resulting
methods. Also moved the BoundaryState and Neighborhood classes from
vtkm::exec::arg to vtkm::exec to be more accessible. Finally, the
Neighborhood class name was changed to FieldNeighborhood to be more
specific on what role this class plays with neighborhood.
Previously, WorkletPointNeighborhood had a template argument to select
the size of the neighborhood. This change removes that template
argument. Instead, the vtkm::exec::arg::BoundaryState methods now take
in a size parameter when determining when it overlaps the boundary.
If in the future we want to add the ability to select the neighborhood
size at compile-time (for performance reasons), I suggest adding this
template argument to the OnBoundary tag for ExecutionSignature.
Previously, vtkm::exec::arg::BoundaryState only provided methods that
said whether or not the neighborhood extened past the boundary of a
mesh. That is fine for a 3x3x3 neighborhood, which can only extend over
the boundary by one. However, that is problematic for larger
neighborhoods where you may need to know how far neighborhood extends
over the boundary.
This changes allows you to query how far the neighborhood extends within
the constrains of the boundary.
