Remove the const from the ValueType of the delegate portal in
ArrayPortalGroupVec. This was creating a Vec with a const type, which
was immutable, which was problematic when trying to create the Vec in
the first place.
The testing of ArrayHandleGroupVec was just using the == operator to
check values. Even though we are not doing any math, optimizers can
sometimes make float values slightly different anyway, so test_equal
should give the correct comparison.
Miscellaneous compiler warnings
Address some compiler warnings in some optional testing code that is not turned on in a lot of dashboards.
See merge request !223
Previously if you created a cell set explicit and didn't set the number of
points you would get a runtime error when you over-ran an array's bounds.
Now we account for this use case and properly generate the Cell To Point
Connectivity.
dbed8827 Correct issues found in code review.
82b977da CellSetExplicit::CreateConnectivity now works with implicit NumIndices.
30f5d628 ConnectivityExplicit will not generate IndexOffsets when they are implicit.
f04ea6d7 CellSetExplicit has userdefined offset storage.
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Kenneth Moreland <kmorel@sandia.gov>
Tested-by: buildbot <buildbot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !212
Fix issue with test_equal of numbers equal 0
There was an error in the test_equal comparison that would return true
when the second value was 0 (or close to 0) and the first value was not.
This was a bug I introduced with commit
b270438fea8a9fe4200322bfe6344ab2075c4d9a. I clearly misinterpreted how a
conditional worked.
See merge request !218
There was an error in the test_equal comparison that would return true
when the second value was 0 (or close to 0) and the first value was not.
This was a bug I introduced with commit
b270438fea8a9fe4200322bfe6344ab2075c4d9a. I clearly misinterpreted how a
conditional worked.
Even when using implicit index's the ConnectivityExplicit would generate
the code to compute the IndexOffsets, which would than fail to compile as
the ArrayHandle would only support read operations. This fixes that issue.
19cebccf Correct issues that buildbot brought up in the code.
c6dbc0f2 GetNumberOfPointsInCell consistently returns a vtkm::IdComponent
25ff1e94 CellSetExplicit storage tags are now easier to override.
935b3fd6 CellSetExplicit uses UInt8 for shape, and IdComponent for numIndices.
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !210
Add new version of DynamicArrayHandle::CastToArrayHandle
This takes a reference to an array handle and fills it. This removes a lot of the pain of determining template arguments.
See merge request !205
These changes are basically to support some upcoming changes to
ArrayHandleZip. The major additions are an implementation of VecTraits
for Pair and an overloaded << operator to ostream for Pair.
I also had to declare the operator<< for Pair to be in Types.h. Under
some circumstances the operator has to either be declared before the
template is declared or declared in the vtkm namespace. (The reasons are
described at <http://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.html#dep_lookup> but I
still don't understand.) I tried adding it to the vtkm namespace, but
that caused several of the other operator<< to fail. Since there is no
way to guarantee that Pair.h is declared before, say, ArrayHandle.h, I
moved the implementation to Types.h.
Since I was moving operator<< to Types.h, I went ahead and moved the
TypeTraits and VecTraits to their respective headers. Since Pair is
declared (but not implemented) in Types.h, these templated classes can
be implemented without including Pair.h.
98885186 Fix CopyInto tests that use different DeviceAdapterTag
69b2ad2a Add unit tests for CopyInto function
2c55b15c Add additional control logic for CopyInto function
20c1a048 CopyInto function for ArrayHandles
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Robert Maynard <robert.maynard@kitware.com>
Merge-request: !202
Xcode 7 warnings
The XCode 7 compiler has a new warning for unused typedefs. The Boost code we use has some instances where this warning gets issued. Suppress these warnings.
See merge request !199
This is to be used in place of BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT so that we can
control its implementation.
The implementation is designed to fix the issue where the latest XCode
clang compiler gives a warning about a unused typedefs when the boost
static assert is used within a function. (This warning also happens when
using the C++11 static_assert keyword.) You can suppress this warning
with _Pragma commands, but _Pragma commands inside a block is not
supported in GCC. The implementation of VTKM_STATIC_ASSERT handles all
current cases.
