Previously, calling `User.model_name.to_json` would result in an infinite
recursion as `.model_name` inherited its `.as_json` behavior from Object. This
patch fixes that unexpected behavior by delegating `.as_json` to :name.
To be able to return type of validator, one can now call `details`
on Errors instance:
```ruby
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
validates :name, presence: true
end
```
```ruby
user = User.new; user.valid?; user.errors.details
=> {name: [{error: :blank}]}
```
`before_validation` and `after_validation` from
ActiveModel::Validation::Callbacks accept an optional `:on` parameter
that was not previously documented or tested. For instance given
before_validation :do_something, on: :create
then `object.valid?(:create)` will invoke `:do_something` while
`object.valid?` or `object.valid?(:anything_else)` will not.
Before this commit, returning `false` in an ActiveModel `before_` callback
such as `before_create` would halt the callback chain.
After this commit, the behavior is deprecated: will still work until
the next release of Rails but will also display a deprecation warning.
The preferred way to halt a callback chain is to explicitly `throw(:abort)`.
Before this commit, returning `false` in an ActiveModel validation
callback such as `before_validation` would halt the callback chain.
After this commit, the behavior is deprecated: will still work until
the next release of Rails but will also display a deprecation warning.
The preferred way to halt a callback chain is to explicitly `throw(:abort)`.
This stems from https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/17227#discussion_r21641358
It's simply a clarification of the current behavior by which if an
`after_` or `around_` ActiveModel callback returns +false+, then the callback
chain **is not halted**.
The callback chain in ActiveModel is only halted when a `before_`
callback returns `false`.
This stems from https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/17227#discussion_r21641358
It's simply a clarification of the current behavior by which if an
`after_validation` ActiveModel callback returns +false+, then further
`after_` callbacks **are not halted**.
I'm not sure what's the use case for this, but apparently it broke some apps.
Since it was not the intended result from #16210 I fixed it to not raise an
exception anymore. However, I didn't add documentation for it because I don't
know if this should be officially supported without knowing how it's meant to
be used.
In general, validations should be side-effect-free (other than adding to the
error message to `@errors`). Order-dependent validations seems like a bad idea.
Fixes#18002
Goals:
1. Default to :random for newly generated applications
2. Default to :sorted for existing applications with a warning
3. Only show the warning once
4. Only show the warning if the app actually uses AS::TestCase
Fixes#16769
We're seeing too many failures to believe otherwise.
This reverts commits bc116a55ca3dd9f63a1f1ca7ade3623885adcc57,
cbde413df3839e06dd14e3c220e9800af91e83ab,
bf0a67931dd8e58f6f878b9510ae818ae1f29a3a, and
2440933fe2c27b27bcafcd9019717800db2641aa.
Calling ActiveSupport::TestCase.i_suck_and_my_tests_are_order_dependent! in AS::TestCase makes
everyone's tests order dependent, which should never be done by the framework.
We are planning to remove mocha from our test suite because of
performance problems. To make this possible we should stop require mocha
on ActionSupport::TestCase.
This should not affect applications since users still need to add mocha
to Gemfile and this already load mocha.
Added FIXME notes to place that still need mocha removal
This change prevents a certain class of user error which results when
mistakenly using the `validate` class method instead of the `validates`
class method.
Only apply when all arguments are symbols, because some validations use
the `validate` method and pass in additional options, namely the
`LenghValidator` via the `ActiveMode::Validations::validates_with`
method.
These methods may cause confusion with the `reset_changes` that
behaves differently
of them.
Also rename undo_changes to restore_changes to match this new set of
methods.
This method name is causing confusion with the `reset_#{attribute}`
methods. While `reset_name` set the value of the name attribute for the
previous value the `reset_changes` only discard the changes and previous
changes.
