Meshes w/o modifiers wouldn't have their derived mesh applied.
Check was to avoid crash but its in fact meaningless,
since the modifier might be disabled, or there may be virtual modifiers.
Not sure why I did not put those from start... Actually *not* having an
undo point here can be problematic, since undoing some previous action
was trying to restore from bad pointer (I think) in UI, generating
asserts.
Note however that it's not a 'pure' undo, in that you may not find your
linked data in exact same state as before deleting it, after an undo,
since it actually implies *reloading* the deleted libraries (and not
restoring from a previously stored memory dump).
Reported by @sergey, thanks.
There is no way currently to prevent the option from showing in menu, so
instead report a warning to user (and curse again current nightmarish
system of operation in outliner...).
Reported by @sergey, thanks.
Pass globals as a bare pointer, same as it sued to be prior to split kernel rework.
AMD CPU platform and Intel OpenCL were complaining about this.
Perhaps we shouldn't pass globals as pointer at all, this isn't something what is
really portable and can cause issues on 32 bit perhaps.
Internal change needed for template support.
Loading the user preferences first so it's possible
for preferences to control startup behavior.
In general it's useful to load preferences before data-files,
so we know security settings for eg.
The range is controlled using the following command line arguments:
--cycles-resumable-start-chunk
--cycles-resumable-end-chunk
Those are 1-based index of range for rendering.
The thing i'm really starting to hate is the requirement to specify both
operation code and node type. Seems to be duplicated enums without real
need for that.
This addresses an issue raised by D2453 -
that there was no way to check if operators are run
multiple times in a row.
Actions are still ignored that don't cause an UNDO event.
Was using some threaded queue on top of task pool, tssk...
Now using properly task pool directly to crunch chunks of smooth fans.
No noticable changes in speed.
Tried to completely get rid of the 'no threading with few loops' code,
but even just creating/freeing the task pool, without actually pushing
any task, is enough to make code 50% slower in worst case scenario (i.e.
few thousands of simple cube objects).
The root of the issue was in custom normal code, so far it assumed that
we could only have one cyclic smooth fan around each vertex, which is...
blatantly wrong (again, the two cones sharing same vertex tip e.g.).
This required a rather deep change in how smooth fans/clnor spaces are processed,
took me some time to find a 'good' solution.
Note that new code is slightly slower than previous one (maybe about 5%),
not much to be done here, am afraid.
Tested against all older report files I could find, seems OK.
- Add optional 'display_name' callback
so callers can construct own names.
- Add optional 'prop_filepath' argument
(for operators that don't use "filepath").
- Add doc-string.
- Use keyword only arguments.
