
Indirect routes should always result in an indriect adjacency even when the route's next-hop is covered by a connceted, since the covering route may change and no tracking is in place. Some de-duplication of code for installing indirect routes via the CLI and API. Change-Id: I7a440ffba43ae3990b68cb407244c06bd0827534 Signed-off-by: Neale <nranns@cisco.com>