Caused by changes in 31e26bb83b. This makes it fall back to the old
method if we can't find a screen.
Patch is actually by @LazyDodo with minor edits by me.
This argument was unused and got nicely optimized out. But once it
starts to be using registers are getting stressed really crazy,
causing slow down of render.
It's not that bad because this typo could only caused not really
efficient BVH traversal, causing higher render times. Not as if
it was causing render artifacts.
This works by using the distance in the x axis only (usually artists want to influence nearby
keyframes based on timing, not value). Tweaking handles is the same as tweaking
the central handle. It's a bit ambiguous if proportional editing is really meaningful
for handles but will leave that for artists to decide.
The issue has been here since we changed drawing code for meshes to use
vertex arrays instead of immediate mode when VBO was off. Basically we
should now always invalidate the GPU objects regardless of the VBO
setting in the preferences.
The bug has been there since 2.73 at least, but what made it apparent
now is that new version resets preferences and as an extension the VBO
flag.
Should be included in final 2.74 release
Typical error using '->next' member of a freed linked list item. A bit trickier
even here, since we have some recursion...
Trivial fix for nasty crasher, safe for 2.74 imho?
The return type of raise_exc_wheel() is bool, but the method return -1. The compiler will change the return type type to an int. This can cause some problems on 64bit systems.
Reviewers: lordloki, sybren
Reviewed By: lordloki, sybren
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1204
It was an issue with what bounds to use for BVH node during construction.
Also corrected case when there are all 4 primitive types in the range and
also there're objects in the same range.
ATI driver does not like declaration of gl_FragColor and glFragData in
the same source file (even though only one of the two is ever
referenced), just use one of the two.
and on screen rendering.
Aaaaah, the beauty of driver implementations of OpenGL!
Turns out the problem here is that drivers calculate df/dy differently
in some cases (probably because OpenGL counts y reverse to how the
window system does, so drivers can get confused).
Fixed this for the ATI case based on info we have so far, there's also
the Intel case which will be handled separately (missing info on Intel's
renderer string etc).
Unfortunately we can't really fix this for the general case so we'll
have to haldle cases as they come in our tracker and by adding silly
string comparisons in our GPU initialization module <sigh>.
