dpdk: Be wary of the return value from rte_eth_dev_socket_id
Prior to dpdk-22.11, VPP can count on rte_eth_dev_socket_id to return numa node 0 if the device didn't set it. Ever since below patch is committed in dpdk https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220929120512.480-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com/#152498 the aforementioned assumption is no longer true. If the device didn't set the numa node, VPP gets -1 from the aforementioned API call. This causes VPP to crash. This fix is to set the numa node to 0 if the API returns -1, or SOCKET_ID_ANY Type: fix Change-Id: I2fde2870e5a3eb98473fe8d119fef594bfba9a8d Signed-off-by: Steven Luong <sluong@cisco.com>
This commit is contained in:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd0c8/bd0c8d8940e4a837d689f42a549f622e2c6ee56c" alt="sluong@cisco.com"
committed by
steven luong
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd0c8/bd0c8d8940e4a837d689f42a549f622e2c6ee56c" alt="steven luong"
parent
4a0e08eb60
commit
e77af765e2
@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ dpdk_lib_init (dpdk_main_t * dm)
|
||||
dpdk_device_config_t *devconf = 0;
|
||||
vnet_eth_interface_registration_t eir = {};
|
||||
dpdk_driver_t *dr;
|
||||
i8 numa_node;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port (port_id))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
@ -448,7 +449,12 @@ dpdk_lib_init (dpdk_main_t * dm)
|
||||
eir.cb.set_max_frame_size = dpdk_set_max_frame_size;
|
||||
xd->hw_if_index = vnet_eth_register_interface (vnm, &eir);
|
||||
hi = vnet_get_hw_interface (vnm, xd->hw_if_index);
|
||||
hi->numa_node = xd->cpu_socket = (i8) rte_eth_dev_socket_id (port_id);
|
||||
numa_node = (i8) rte_eth_dev_socket_id (port_id);
|
||||
if (numa_node == SOCKET_ID_ANY)
|
||||
/* numa_node is not set, default to 0 */
|
||||
hi->numa_node = xd->cpu_socket = 0;
|
||||
else
|
||||
hi->numa_node = xd->cpu_socket = numa_node;
|
||||
sw = vnet_get_hw_sw_interface (vnm, xd->hw_if_index);
|
||||
xd->sw_if_index = sw->sw_if_index;
|
||||
dpdk_log_debug ("[%u] interface %s created", port_id, hi->name);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user