The `FilterField` class provides convenience functions for subclasses to
determine the `ArrayHandle` type for scalar and vector fields. However, you
needed to know the specific size of vectors. For filters that support an
input field of any type, a new form, `CastAndCallVariableVecField` has been
added. This calls the underlying functor with an `ArrayHandleRecombineVec`
of the appropriate component type.
The `CastAndaCallVariableVecField` method also reduces the number of
instances created by having a float fallback for any component type that
does not satisfy the field types.
The legacy VTK file reader previously only supported a specific set of Vec
lengths (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9). This is because a basic array
handle has to have the vec length compiled in. However, the new
`ArrayHandleRuntimeVec` feature is capable of reading in any vec-length
and can be leveraged to read in arbitrarily sized vectors in field
arrays.
5bdd3c7bc Move ArrayHandleRuntimeVec metadata to a separate class
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Li-Ta Lo <ollie@lanl.gov>
Merge-request: !3062
ee9c78ca9 Merge branch 'master' into rendering_cpp_cleanup
d05025ce8 simplify comment
066e6a696 I think this is the proper way doing PIMPL
6e75be33e unique_ptr know if itself is valid
50a9efc2f use rvalue ref for parameter
61c002072 cleanup C++ usage, use unique_ptr for PIMPL
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Kenneth Moreland <morelandkd@ornl.gov>
Merge-request: !3057
Originally, the metadata structure used by the `ArrayHandleRuntimeVec`
storage was a nested class of its `Storage`. But the `Storage` is
templated on the component type, and the metadata object is the same
regardless. In addition to the typical minor issue of having the
compiler create several identical classes, this caused problems when
pulling arrays from equivalent but technically different C types (for
example, `long` is the same as either `int` or `long long`).
There was an error in `operator-=` for `IteratorFromArrayPortal` that went
by unnoticed. The operator is fixed and regression tests for the operators
has been added.
3c1afe53d Fix new instances of ArrayHandleRuntimeVec in UnknownArrayHandle
Acked-by: Kitware Robot <kwrobot@kitware.com>
Acked-by: Li-Ta Lo <ollie@lanl.gov>
Merge-request: !3058
`UnknownArrayHandle` is supposed to treat `ArrayHandleRuntimeVec` the
same as `ArrayHandleBasic`. However, the `NewInstance` methods were
failing because they need custom handling of the vec size.
In addition to using uniform coordinates, the ContourFlyingEdges filter can now process any type of coordinate system, making the filter use Flying Edges in more cases
In order to compile the contour filter more efficiently, we split the contour filter into two separate translation units, corresponding to the new filters ContourFlyingEdges and ContourMarchingCells. The API for Contour filter is left totally unchanged, and tries to use flying edges if the dataset is structured and uniform.
All three contour filters inherit from the `AbstractContour` class, providing utility methods used in the implementations.
Fix compiler warnings......
Kick the dashboards..........
Kick the dashboards.....
use lambda instead of functor, remove unused code
ArrayHandle::StorageType should be public
StorageType is public in vtkm::cont::ArrayHandle, but some subclasses
re-declare it as private. Having it public provides a convenient way to
get the storage type of an ArrayHandle, otherwise it is quite verbose.
Addresses: #314
Tetrahedralize and Triangulate filters check if input is already triangulated
Previously, tetrahedralize/triangulate would blindly convert all the cells to tetrahedra/triangles, even when they were already. Now, the dataset is directly returned if the CellSet is a CellSetSingleType of tetras/triangles, and no further processing is done in the worklets for CellSetExplicit when all shapes are tetras or triangles.
ci,crusher: changed fs to orion
ci,osx,macos: fix value of GIT_CLONE_PATH
Add a regression test for passing a variant as an argument to a worklet.
Variants are tricky objects, and the compiler might make some strange
assumptions during optimization.
One case that popped up in particular was when a variant contained two
objects with the same `sizeof` but the first object had padding. When the
variant contained the second object, the value under the padded part of
the first object was not set.
I've been seeing errors in a nightly build that compiles for CUDA Pascal
using GCC5. The issue is that one of the `ArrayHandleMultiplexer` tests
is failing to copy an implicit array correctly. I think the problem is
that in this test the first and second type of the `Variant` are the same
size, but the first type has some padding in the middle whereas the
second type does not. When using this second type, the values in the
same position of the padding of the first type don't seem to be
initialized properly in the kernel invocation.
My nonexhaustive experiment shows that things work OK as long as the
first type is large enough and has no fillers. Enforce this by adding an
internal entry to the union that is completely full.
